A Market-Beating Juggernaut

Published in Company Comment on 2 May 2012

This blue-chip success story is still booming.

During the late Noughties, Bart Becht became one of the UK's most talked-about big bosses.

Brilliant Becht

When British business Reckitt & Colman took over Dutch firm Benckiser in December 1999, Becht took the helm as chief executive of the merged group Reckitt Benckiser (LSE: RB).

Over the next decade, Becht turned Reckitt Benckiser into one of Europe's most admired companies. Through better marketing of its core brands, new product launches and well-timed acquisitions, Reckitt became one of the best-performing companies in the blue-chip FTSE 100 index of elite British businesses.

Reckitt's last major purchase was to buy SSL International -- owner of the Durex (condoms) and Scholl (footcare) brands -- for £2.5 billion, a deal that completed in November 2010.

As well as bringing him corporate admiration, Becht's success at Reckitt Benckiser brought him massive personal rewards. Thanks to a huge surge in Reckitt's share price -- it has quintupled, up 400% since 1999 -- Becht became one of the UK's highest-paid bosses.

Indeed, Becht caused a public outcry when he received a package worth £92 million in 2009, despite donating £110 million to a charitable trust that very same year.

Nevertheless, Reckitt shareholders adored Becht and didn't begrudge their super-CEO his fortune, as he had helped to make them about £20 billion better off. Indeed, when Becht announced his shock resignation in April 2011, Reckitt's market value dived by £1.8 billion, down 7.5% in one day.

Benckiser after Bart

Becht stepped down at the end of August 2011, to be replaced by Rakesh Kapoor, a Reckitt veteran with 25 years of service. So, is Reckitt still booming after Becht's departure?

Based on the figures released at noon on Tuesday, Reckitt is doing just fine. Indeed, the maker of, Cillit Bang, Dettol, Nurofen and Strepsils is doing rather well.

In the first quarter of 2012, Reckitt reported that it was "on target", thanks to a 4% increase in net revenues to nearly £2.4 billion. This was driven by strong revenue rises in its Latin America/Asia-Pacific (up 13%) and RUMEA (Russia/CIS, Africa, North Africa, Middle East and Turkey, up 9%) operations, plus 6% uplifts at its food and pharmaceutical divisions.

However, in a now-familiar tale, Reckitt's performance in its core region, Europe and North America, was weaker, with revenue dipping by 1% to below £1.2 billion. So, emerging-market growth is helping to offset a slowdown in the 'old world'.

Reckitt -- the world's biggest maker of cleaning products -- did well in certain areas, recording strong revenue growth in its core Hygiene division, up 7% to nearly £1 billion. Growth was a more modest 2% in its Home and Portfolio Brands arms, and there was no revenue growth from Health.

New chief Kapoor welcomed these results, which showed that Reckitt was growing faster than its markets once again. He remarked: "Reckitt Benckiser's first-quarter results were on track and in line with our ingoing expectations. These results give us the confidence to reiterate our [financial year] 2012 target of like-for-like net revenue growth of 200 [basis points] above our market growth rate of 1-2%. We also expect to maintain full-year operating margins."

In other words, Reckitt's sales are beating expectations, while its margins are holding up. That's good news for shareholders of the cleaning colossus.

Powerful brands at a premium price

As I write, Reckitt shares have slipped 15p to 3,605p, which values the group at over £26 billion. At this price, it trades on a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 14.8 and offers a prospective dividend yield of 3.6%, covered a healthy 1.9 times.

As a value investor, these fundamentals would not normally be attractive enough to lure me into buying shares in Reckitt Benckiser. However, I also recognise that Reckitt is no ordinary company. Hence, although Bart Becht is no longer at the helm, I'd still be happy owning a slice of this Anglo-Dutch success story. Thanks to its brand power, Reckitt remains a market-beating juggernaut!

Neil Woodford also owns shares in Reckitt Benckiser. The identities of his favourite blue chips are revealed in this free Motley Fool report -- "8 Shares Held By Britain's Super Investor".

Further investment opportunities:

> Cliff does not own any of the shares mentioned in this article.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

F958B 02 May 2012 , 11:55am

Strong growth overseas.
Sluggish growth in developed markets.
Single-digit profit growth.
Decent, well-covered dividend.

Sounds like Tesco - but at twice the price.

CunningCliff 02 May 2012 , 12:17pm

Good points, F958B, but I would be happy to own both Reckitt and Tesco.

However, I reckon that RB stands a good change of outperforming Tesco over time, thanks to its 'power brands'...

Cliff

timeandpatience 02 May 2012 , 12:18pm

A good example of paying a fair price for a wonderful business......

CunningCliff 02 May 2012 , 12:31pm

Hello again, F958B,

Also, RB is gaining market share across the board, while Tesco's is at its lowest for seven years.

Cliff

F958B 02 May 2012 , 12:33pm

t&p

I wouldn't say RB's price was "fair".

The long-term average P/E multiple of the market as a whole is about 12x.
Currently FTSE is a little lower.
RB - at 15x earnings - trade noticably above those earnings multiples and are in the second earnings quintile of the FTSE100.

So at the moment, it is a decent business selling for a premium price.

Like Buffett; I'd rather wait until they stumble or fall out of fashion and then load-up.


F958B 02 May 2012 , 12:39pm

Hi, Cliff

You can have RB @ 15x forward P/E, 3.75% forward yield and with expected growth of just 1% p.a. average for the next two years.

I'll take TSCO @ 9x P/E, 5% yield and with expected growth of 5% p.a. average for the next two years.

TSCO start with a lower valuation, a higher dividend yield and better (expected) growth prospects. At "only" 9x earnings, TSCO are priced for much inferior performance compared to RB, yet analyst expectations (including mine) are that TSCO will at least match RB's growth.
Over the long term, the market is a weighing machine.

kiffberet 02 May 2012 , 12:49pm

I bought RB the day Bart left and got them on the cheap. Since then they're up 15%, which is great, but as FB says, I can't bring myself to buy any more at these prices. The problem I have is that the price doesn't look like its going to fall any time soon. Whenever it kicks off in Europe with Italian and Spanish bond sales, everything else goes down but RB holds its ground or goes up...
Damn these rock solid shares!!!

CunningCliff 02 May 2012 , 1:40pm

Hi F958B,

I'm not anti-Tesco, far from it. In fact, I'm a big fan at current prices, see:

http://www.fool.co.uk/news/investing/company-comment/2012/03/15/tough-times-for-tesco.aspx

"Frankly, buying the UK's leading retailer on a single-digit PER and a near-5% yield seems a no-brainer to me, so I'd urge you to top up on Tesco today!"

http://www.fool.co.uk/news/investing/2012/04/18/tesco-fails-to-grow-in-britain.aspx

"Having urged Fools to buy Tesco at 321.5p a month ago, I'm going to stick to my guns. While these results are a mixed bag, I suspect that they reflect short-term problems at Tesco. In the medium term, I imagine the reshuffled management team will inject new life into the UK portfolio (aided by £1 billion of spending in 2012/13), while enjoying glowing growth abroad!"

Cliff

richjfool 02 May 2012 , 4:15pm

Cliff,

Any chance of you posting a link to this article on the SA - DE portfolio boards under RB. I'm sure the abandoned ex members of DE would appreciate what follow up info they can get or glean.

From an ex member and happy holder of RB.

MrBearBull888 02 May 2012 , 4:32pm

Hi Richfool

I will post a link it's a great article

tux222 02 May 2012 , 6:19pm

"A great company at too great a price"? That's really the issue if you are considering buying the shares. If you think so, pop it on your watch list and buy only if it gets cheaper.

snoekie 02 May 2012 , 7:07pm

F958B, er RB @ twice the price of Tesco???

Try nearly 10 times, and a lesser return on capital, nearly 1%!

At it's price, hardly get a decent holding unless you have very deep pockets.

Dozey1 02 May 2012 , 10:46pm

I sometimes wish that in my early, rather speculative, investment years I had held tightly shares in good companies that always seemed to be a bit expensive. My fault (one of several) was to buy the occasional good company at a fair price, but then sell it as it became expensive, or to my mind the value had outed. Thus I sold Reckitt years ago at less than a fiver; same more recently with XP Power, and ASOS and... there are others... oh yes, Avon Rubber springs to mind which is in the news today.

richjfool 03 May 2012 , 3:12am

Thanks Mr BearBull,

I'm pleased to say I got into RB and Diageo (similar situation) a couple of years back, and do intend to sit tight (whether deemed expensive or not).

kvet 08 May 2012 , 10:14pm

Unreformed sexist scientist that I am, I have always believed that advertising's softest target is a housewife. 90% of household cleaning can be done with washing-up liquid. Those adverts showing gorgeous housewives lovingly using patent disinfectant on their loos to protect their kids may be positively dangerous in removing harmless bacteria -they may be quickly replaced by infectious ones.
As far as shampoos, conditioners etc go- all so heavily advertised on the box-they are all basically the same with the exceptiom of the dyes used and the ratios of the few chemicals allowed in their composition.
It's been decades since the last chemical breakthrough in these products, but follow the advertising- Unlever, RB, etc will do you proud for years to come.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.