The SuperGroup Disaster

Published in Company Comment on 25 April 2012

The fashion retailer's shares have nosedived, but could we have seen it coming?

For those who haven't yet heard it, SuperGroup (LSE: SGP), the owner of the Superdry fashion brand, is in deep trouble.

In February, a profit warning led to a slide in the share price, and that was followed this week by the bizarre revelation that the bean-counters had done their sums wrong, and things are actually considerably worse than feared.

The latest was accompanied by news of stock management problems causing a further shortfall in sales, and what little confidence was left in the management was severely shaken. The shares took a new 40% tumble and, as I write, the price is down under 350p, having actually recovered a little from a low of 310p.

And it had all started so well.

A new star

Supergroup floated in March 2010 at £5 per share, raising £120 million in the process and valuing the group at £375 million.

By June 2011, the share price had rocketed to nearly four times its float price, at over £18. That £375 million market cap was pushing on towards the £1.5 billion mark. But at that time, the shares were on a trailing price-to-earnings ratio of around 60. That's a phenomenon common with growth shares in their early days, but it often tends to factor in all of the growth potential and little or none of the risk.

When a set of results comes in a little behind the optimistic hopes, people sit back and re-evaluate the shares on fundamentals, and we end up with a downward re-rating of the price. What has happened is the valuation has "reverted to the mean", more in line with other companies in the same kind of business on more sustainable longer-term performance measurements.

By early last year, I think it was pretty clear that SuperGroup shares were caught in one of those early growth share bubbles. But there were management problems yet to come to light.

The bad news starts

With the share price sliding back, trouble in the supply chain hit the news in May, when the firm failed to get its summer clothing line out to its shops in time for the warm Spring weather. The news led to a further 22% fall in the share price, now down to £12.

That was followed in October by news of warehousing issues affecting the ability to get clothes onto people's backs in the volumes needed to keep the "growth share" story growing. That, we were told, would knock £9m from year-end profits. The result was a 25% fall this time, knocking the shares down to around 750p.

Then came February's news of declining sales growth, and the reversion to the mean kicked in further, sending the shares down to 575p. And the accounting errors revealed this week are really just down to incompetence.

Managing the brand

And then there is the problem of managing the desirability of a fashion brand. It really does pose quite a dilemma -- it's the celeb exclusivity that makes the fashionistas want to be part of a brand, but that's diametrically opposed to selling as much stuff as possible.

But it can be done, by getting your target markets right and keeping control over your distribution channels. Burberry (LSE: BRBY), after its rather embarrassing chav phase, has been a great example of how to do that well.

But even last year, here in Liverpool I was starting to see Superdry clothing adorning not just the attractive frames of the pretty young things, but the bellies of middle-aged men and teenagers wearing that Merseyside must-have, the black hooded tracksuit. Where Burberry once had its chavs, Superdry was attracting scouse hoodies.

Today, Superdry goods are showing up at some TK Maxx stores and eBay retailers, suggesting a desperation to offload stock. And that is really not good for the image of an up-market fashion brand.

Wobble

So in the end, could we have seen it coming? Well, I think the peak-price overvaluation was obvious at the time. But worse than that, those repeated "isolated" incidents of supply-side failure were harbingers of management that just wasn't up to the task of meeting those optimistic growth expectations.

It really was time to get off the growth wagon when the first wheel started to wobble.

For help trying to grow and preserve your wealth, start your 30-day free trial to Motley Fool Share Advisor today. You'll get immediate access to what we believe are the best shares you can buy today, complete with our in-depth analysis and ongoing coverage.  

Further investment opportunities:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

theRealGrinch 25 Apr 2012 , 4:26pm

I refer you to the fool article from feb 2010 urging us to buy at 1600p. many of us were warning back then that this share was overpriced and cack

Crawfish123 25 Apr 2012 , 5:10pm

run for the hills!!! ;-)

F958B 25 Apr 2012 , 5:30pm

C annot
R ecommend
A
P urchase

TMFBoing 25 Apr 2012 , 7:38pm

I refer you to the fool article from feb 2010 urging us to buy at 1600p. many of us were warning back then that this share was overpriced and cack

Wasn't me - I was in the "cack" camp.

(And I presume you mean Feb 2011 - they didn't float until March 2010)

Best,
Alan
TMFBoing

F958B 25 Apr 2012 , 7:55pm

Hi Alan

"Float" sums it up nicely.

mcturra2000 25 Apr 2012 , 9:18pm

I assume you guys are referring to the article "Super Name, Super Company" on 07-Feb-2011. http://bit.ly/IEr3HU

"SuperGroup on a forward P/E of 27, the PEG ratio is only a little over 0.6. That's great value for a growth stock." ... "if you haven't bought in yet, it is not too late to do so." ... "we have a long way to go before we reach that peak"



duffmanchon 25 Apr 2012 , 9:56pm

My experience with SGP has taught me a valuable lesson, although fortunately I didn't bet the farm on them, don't buy after a write up on the motley fool! I bought around 650p after reading the article on 7th Feb, doh! I figured there was still room to grow with the new store openings and overseas and had stupidly anchored on the 1800p price high. I thought, ok, one bad year with the warehouse and now we are back in business, how wrong I was! From now on I will avoid pure growth stocks which pay no divi.

duffmanchon 25 Apr 2012 , 10:01pm

Correction. It wasn't the 7th Feb 2011 article. I cant find it now but it was late last year and entitled something like "this stock is up 40% in 3 months" I guess it has taught me that "momentum" plays are not for me as well!

amsterdamgroove 25 Apr 2012 , 10:16pm

duffmanchon, my feelings exactly. I just hope for some recovery going forward and I will get off.

vinchainsaw 26 Apr 2012 , 9:36am

I would honestly love to see a follow-up article by Prabhat.
Not to point fingers (or laugh), just to get his honest thoughts on the matter at this point.
Everyone gets some wrong; that happens. Its the introspection that follows that is normally interesting.

Investing is as much (if not more) about the wrong decisions than the right decisions.

LastChip 26 Apr 2012 , 11:39am

I seem to remember, this was the company Jim Slater was raving about on a podcast, sighting (amongst other things) it's great management and the wonderful growth to come.

So much for investment guru's, though I suppose for a while, you could argue it did.

If it sounds too good to be true.....

Fortunately, having made a substantial loss years ago betting on the rag trade, I swore never to do it again; and I've kept to my word.

vinchainsaw 26 Apr 2012 , 12:10pm

LastChip,

My old man was in the rag trade and I saw first hand how the wheels can come off. In his case it was the lifting of import tariffs against the Chinese and they overnight went from 30% to 70% of the world market.

Not an arena I want to be playing in.

HousingBear999 26 Apr 2012 , 12:20pm

vinchainsaw - I agree re a follow up article by Prabhat would be interesting, just in a "lessons learned" kind of way. John Authers, of the FT (then Long View, now Lex), wrote in 2010 very openly and honestly about how he'd missed the mini-boom in the FTSE post the March 2009 low, i.e. been overly-pessimistic. This was great work by John - who's articles are always insightful - and a bit of post-match analysis can often be helpful. Being open myself, my own biggest failing was Southern Cross Healthcare - I believed in the longterm care home story, but just didn't research the company itself properly.

cduance 26 Apr 2012 , 2:20pm

I too would be interested in a review article as we can all learn more from the mistakes we make than from the times we get things right. Would be particularly interested in any factors outside the numbers that are being presented which could point to something not being a good play etc.

MikeGG1 26 Apr 2012 , 8:15pm

The thing about bubbles is that they always burst sooner or later.

If the share price doubles then sell one third. That drops the effective price to half the original.

If the share price doubles again then sell enough to cover your original stake. You then have 7/12 of the original quantity of shares for free!

After that it doesn't matter what happens. You will still be in profit!

Anyone can be too greedy.

Mike

ps200 27 Apr 2012 , 10:23pm

@vinchainsaw & HousingBear

Good idea guys, I'll see what I can put together....

Prabhat.

ninoson 30 Apr 2012 , 9:47am

"I seem to remember, this was the company Jim Slater was raving about on a podcast"

I think it was Jim Slater's son Mark who runs an investment fund, who was praising the shares on Money Talk.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.