Hargreaves Lansdown Set For Another Record Year

Published in Company Comment on 19 April 2012

Is the well-known ISA and SIPP provider a good investment itself?

Popular investment services provider Hargreaves Lansdown (LSE: HL) published a third-quarter trading update this morning.

The FTSE 100 firm, whose Vantage range of tax-free ISAs and low-cost SIPPs has made it a big hit with private investors, reported operating revenue up by 16% to £175m in the year to date, with Assets under Administration standing at a new high of £26bn at 31 March.

The third-quarter performance, in the traditionally busy time leading up to the end of the tax year, puts Hargreaves Lansdown (HL) firmly on track for a fifth consecutive year of record profits since its flotation on the stock market.

Ahead of the competition

HL tells us it has seen no material impact from increasing competition in the sector. The company is confident its philosophy of "best prices, best service and best information" is ensuring it continues to compete profitably.

While partial withdrawals of money from funds, especially ISAs, remain higher than last year -- "driven by client personal expenditure requirements in tough times" -- HL says outflows have been less than competitors and more than offset by substantial inward transfers of ISA and SIPP money, leading to net business inflows of £1bn during the period.

HL's operations are highly cash-generative, and its balance sheet is extremely robust. In addition to operating revenue, the firm has received £1.5m of interest on its own cash surplus in the past nine months.

Valuation

When I wrote about HL just over a year ago, the shares were trading at 575p. That put the company on an eye-watering trailing 12-month price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 35, falling to 27 on forward 12-month earnings forecasts.

I said at that time that, while the fundamentals for the business remained sound going forward, HL would have to continue growing at breakneck speed to justify the market's rating, and that the valuation was too rich for me.

That's proved to have been a decent call, the shares having fallen 16% against a market decline of 5% at yesterday's close. So, how does the valuation look now?

The market has responded favourably to this morning's news, and HL's shares are trading up 5% at 505p at the time of writing. The trailing 12-month P/E is 22, falling to 19 on forward 12-month earnings forecasts -- perhaps a little lower than 19 if forecasts are revised upwards following this morning's update.

On the face of it, then, HL's shares appear a lot more attractive today than they were this time last year. However, last year's forecast P/E of 27 was on forecast earnings growth of 40%. This year's forecast P/E of 19 is on forecast earnings growth of 18%. In other words, while HL is cheaper today on P/E, it's actually more expensive on a P/E-to-earnings-growth (PEG) basis.

As the table below shows, growth in one of the main drivers of the business -- increasing client numbers -- is on a moderating trend.

 Active "Vantage" clientsIncrease
30 Jun 2008245,000--
31 Dec 2008252,0002.9%
30 Jun 2009282,00011.9%
31 Dec 2009300,0006.4%
30 Jun 2010330,00010.0%
31 Dec 2010346,0004.8%
30 Jun 2011380,0009.8%
31 Dec 2011396,0004.2%

As you can see, from 2009 the company's first-half numbers run 6.4%, 4.8% and 4.2%; the second-half numbers run 11.9%, 10.0% and 9.8%.

For investors, then, judging an appropriate valuation for the moderating speed of client-numbers growth and more modest earnings-growth forecasts looks the key call.

A PEG ratio of 1 is said to indicate fair value, and I reckon that's about where HL is.

> We cover these types of investments – and make specific share recommendations – in Motley Fool Share Advisor, a premium investing service designed to help you preserve and grow your wealth. If you'd like to see for yourself how we can help, start your 30-day free trial today. There's no obligation to subscribe.

More from G A Chester

> The Motley Fool owns shares in Hargreaves Lansdown.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

goodlifer 19 Apr 2012 , 11:01am

Still too pricey.
My rule of thumb: a decent share's worth about 15 times earnings, and not a penny more.

If I held any HL - which I don't - I'd be inclined to think about selling before the moths got at it.

Tykethat 19 Apr 2012 , 11:50am

5 years ago HL were the best, today I would put Bestinvest, Alliance Trust and Sippdeal in front of HL, especially for customers with larger portfolios.

UncleEbenezer 19 Apr 2012 , 12:08pm

It's the Tesco of fund management.

The question is, the Tesco of when? Clearly not early-stage of growth. But is it nearer to Tescos 2001 or 2011 in terms of its trajectory?

Management is clearly on-the-ball in terms of bringing new and often attractive features to clients (I am one, and they're about to get another £30k of my funds). But in the face of increasing competition it's hard to see how long the premium can be sustained.

UncleEbenezer 19 Apr 2012 , 12:11pm

Whoops, should've said above, swings and roundabouts: they're getting £30k, but last tax year (and ongoing) they lost another chunk of my business (bigger in the long term) to a newcomer undercutting them ...

goodlifer 19 Apr 2012 , 12:13pm

HI Tykethat,

Why " especially for customers with larger portfolios?"

LastChip 19 Apr 2012 , 2:47pm

Far too rich a valuation for a business that is doomed to decline.

Remember, over the next few years, many of the "baby boom" era will be retiring and therefore, funds are bound to deplete.

Demographics suggest, there won't be sufficient people and available free cash to fill the gap.

As others have said, from a client perspective, there are other firms that offer a better deal. So how long before they slip?

rober00 19 Apr 2012 , 5:08pm

My SIPP is currently with them, but they are far to expensive for my much, much, larger main portfolio.

I suspect that if they do not reduce their annual maximum SIPP cost then they will be losing my SIPP to one of their competitors mentioned by Tykethat above.

duffmanchon 19 Apr 2012 , 5:54pm

HL is a star business. They are very customer focused. The app for Android/Iphone is great, I have personally bought shares using it and the process is so simple. They sure know how to promote themselves too, I have seen Tom McPhail on the news more times than I can remember. I have seen in marketing/business books that word of mouth is one of the best methods and I have personally recommended them to several family members and friends. That is gold dust, free advertising! I see HL as a GARP play at my purchase price of 480p.

sparkyscientist 19 Apr 2012 , 6:48pm

I'm in two minds over HL. They do provide a great service, but at a cost. I've learned over the years that they do promote those funds that give them trailing commission. They don't promote ITs, ETFs or shares.

So I've been moving money out of their Vantage service, in order to buy ITs, ETFs and shares through an alternative provider

squirel007 20 Apr 2012 , 9:29am

Sparky,

I am surprised you have not looked into it more throughly. HL offer you ability to keep all your investments with one provider. That means all the different asset classes, OEICS, IT, ETFs, GILTs, etc. You can keep it within a tax shelter such as SIPP or ISA or plain investments. They provide regular, good analysis on most shares.
Over the years they have been promoting Unit trusts and similar, just as Best Invest and other advisers because these are most profitable for the adviser. That means that if you are a shareholder, you will benefit.
I have compared their charges on managing (or facilitating your portfolio on execution only basis) your investments and found them capped and very competitive.
Within my SIPP with HL, I have about 70% in shares, ITs (shares) and ETFs. The rest is with unit trusts and the like but you do not pay to HL annual management charge on these.
So, I will be holding on to my HL shares (bought long time ago at a good price) as a long term investment and part of diversification.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.