RBS Shares Offered To Abu Dhabi

Published in Company Comment on 27 March 2012

Shares in RBS climb 6% on reports the oil-rich state will buy some of our state-owned shares.

This morning, shares in Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS) leapt by more than 6%. As I write, they trade at 29.4p, valuing the bank at around £17.4 billion.

The big banking bailout

This sudden rise in the RBS share price followed a BBC news report yesterday evening that the government has held talks to sell part of the public's stake to oil-rich Gulf state Abu Dhabi and other heavyweight investors.

During the banking crisis of 2008-09, taxpayers backed massive bailouts of RBS, injecting £45.2 billion in cash into the bank in return for nearly 90.7 billion shares. In other words, we bought 83% of RBS at an average price of 49.9p per share.

Alas, with RBS shares changing hands at 29.4p, we British taxpayers are sitting on a loss of almost £18.6 billion, thanks to a 41% fall in the value of our investment.

Abu Dhabi to the rescue

Today, we Brits own roughly 82% of RBS, but this stake is something of a political football. Although our shareholding is managed at arm's length by UK Financial Investments (UKFI), ministers have been unable to resist interfering in the affairs of the bank. Recently, this political meddling forced RBS chief executive Stephen Hester to turn down a near-£1 million bonus.

Clearly, the government's RBS stake is something of a hot potato -- something to be handed back to the private sector as soon as this is politically viable. Hence, the BBC yesterday reported that the UK could sell part of its stake to overseas investors, notably Abu Dhabi, the richest of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), as well as Kuwaiti, Qatari and Saudi Arabian funds.

According to the BBC, the UK government could sell between a tenth (10%) and a third (33%) of its RBS stake to Abu Dhabi's sovereign wealth fund and/or its royal family. Also, it claims that these negotiations have been going on for months and could continue into next year.

Critics immediately pounced on this news as proof that the UK government is willing to take a loss of billions of pounds on its RBS stake by holding a 'fire sale' of RBS shares. Then again, these discussions could flush out other state and private-sector investors, thus pushing up the bank's share price yet further.

Don't bank on it

Note that this wouldn't be the first time that the UAE has come to the rescue of a British bank. During the global financial crash, the UAE invested £1.2 billion in a share placing by Barclays (LSE: BARC) and went on to make handsome returns. At £550 billion, Abu Dhabi's sovereign wealth fund is the largest in the world, so buying all of RBS today would consume a mere 3% to 4% of its capital.

According to my calculations, selling a third of our stake in RBS today (over 27% of the bank) would generate sale proceeds of around £4.7 billion. However, it would also crystallise a loss in the region of £3.3 billion, thus producing a mountain of bad publicity for politicians.

Nevertheless, the coalition government has signalled that it does not wish to be a long-term holder of RBS. Therefore, we should expect more sale rumours to emerge during 2012 and 2013 if financial markets -- and the RBS share price -- continue their recovery.

> Get the latest on investing and the markets, direct from the desk of David Kuo. You'll also receive a special free report on '10 Steps To Making A Million' if you join The Motley Fool Collective today.

More from Cliff D'Arcy:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

LastChip 27 Mar 2012 , 2:08pm

Never ever let politicians near business.

What with GB selling gold at the bottom and now this lot talking about selling our shares at a loss, is it any wonder we're in the state we're in.

innocentatlarge 27 Mar 2012 , 5:31pm

LastChip

You have hit the nail on the head. These shares will recover and will produce a profit for the government if they have the nous to hold on to them.

horatio76 27 Mar 2012 , 9:09pm

innocentatlarge, LastChip,

Agree entirely with with both of you. If Abu Dhabi can see the potential growth and value in these shares why can't the government? Simple politics (and arguments over bonuses) over fiscal acumen I suspect.

mcecaro 28 Mar 2012 , 10:54am

break it up in parts....start selling Natwest and recoup some money ....very easy

girindor 28 Mar 2012 , 12:59pm

As long as the government is a majority shareholder, they will keep meddling, thus decreasing any potential upside in these shares. In other words, unless the government sells at a loss, the shares will not gain anyway. I say, go ahead and sell up.

OR

Follow through on Nick Clegg's / The Centre Forum's idea of distributing the shares to the UK public with a price floor (only allowed to sell once the price hits £X).

john10001 28 Mar 2012 , 9:12pm

Buy low, sell high. First rule of investing. Not the other way around!

Don't the British taxpayers get a say in this seen as it is our money that bought 80+% of RBS in the first place to bail out the corrupt bankers?

I say we keep the stake indefinitely until the problem is sorted out. You don't sell something to satisfy an election pledge or for ideological reasons especially if it is the wrong time to sell.

I favour waiting this one out and also would like to see RBS as well as Lloyds each broken up into several parts, and probably on a regional basis. This will restore competition and profitability as well as creating value and forcing these morally bankrupt goliaths to change and get their houses in order.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.