F&C Sees Billions Vanish

Published in Company Comment on 15 March 2012

The fund manager loses over £7bn of assets, but maintains its chunky dividend.

F&C Asset Management (LSE: FCAM) released its 2011 results today, providing more proof that last year was a tough one for asset managers. Despite a mixed performance, its shares have their attractions and, in particular, a decent, well-covered dividend.

£7.2 billion departs

In the year to 31 December 2011, F&C saw £7.2 billion of net outflows from its funds, driven largely by outflows from strategic partners in Portugal and Ireland. However, gross sales to institutions were strong, with £4.6 billion won in 2011 and another £1.2 billion won but not added by the year-end.

As a result of fund flows into and out of F&C, its assets under management -- a key performance indicator for fund managers -- slipped by more than 5% to just over £100 billion.

Despite this top-line drop, F&C's net revenue leapt by 10% to £267 million, but underlying operating profit dipped £2 million to £65 million. Alas, F&C's operating margin -- another key indicator of financial strength -- dipped from 27.6% to 24.4%.

With underlying profit after tax dropping slightly to just over £28 million, F&C's earnings per share dropped to 5.5p from 5.7p. Nevertheless, it held its final dividend at 2p, for a full-year dividend of 3p.

Another plus is the reduction in F&C's net debt, which fell from nearly £96 million to below £78 million, a drop of almost 19%. This was helped by F&C's ongoing strategic review and cost-reduction programme, which is ahead of plan and should lower costs by £33.2 million by the end of this year.

A mixed bag of results

As I write, F&C's shares have fallen 3.5p to 69.5p, which values the FTSE 250 firm at £370 million. Clearly, investors were disappointed with these mixed results, with funds under management, operating margin and profit falling, but underlying earnings holding up reasonably well, the dividend held and net debt reduced.

Then again, F&C is undergoing a process of accelerated change, with five new directors joining the board in 2011 and chief executive Alain Grisay leaving in May after six years at the helm.

Also, given intense investor demand for the relative safe haven of bonds, F&C's focus on fixed-income funds could well pay off in future. In addition, its fund performances have been above-average, which should attract further inflows.

A decent dividend

Thanks to its cost-cutting programme, F&C expects improved earnings per share and dividend cover from 2013 onwards. Right now, its shares trade on a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 9.2 and offer a prospective dividend yield of 4.8%, covered a healthy 2.4 times.

These are undemanding fundamentals for a business geared towards recovering financial markets. Hence, I would suggest investors add F&C to their watch lists. If its share price goes any lower, then it will move closer towards becoming an outright buy.

> Get the latest on investing and the markets, direct from the desk of David Kuo. You'll also receive a special free report on '10 Steps To Making A Million' if you join The Motley Fool Collective today.

More from Cliff D'Arcy:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

tetraquark 05 Jun 2012 , 10:08am

A bit a a belated response to this article but I came across it when doing a bit of research on FCAM.

Reading the annual report it doesn't look like a healthy dividend to me. The recent divi record is:

2007 - 7p
2008 - 6p
2009 - 6p
2010 - 5p
2011 - 3p

The dividend cover over this 5 year period has never been better than 0.54. How long can this continue?

The current earnings per share is -0.1p giving negative divi cover. The 5.5p eps quoted in the article is the underlying eps before exceptional items and before non-controlling interests take their cut.

I'm trying to understand what activist investor Edward Bramson sees in the company that I don't see. The numbers just don't stack up for me at the moment. I guess he's worked out that it was badly managed and that he can make enough cost savings so that the value will come out. Only time will tell...

Might be worth a more detailed analysis of the report to try and understand things a bit better but I certainly won't be buying it for it's "decent dividend"!

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.