BAT Lights Up With 11% Dividend Increase

Published in Company Comment on 24 February 2012

Can new regulations ever reduce the profitability of tobacco companies?

Big Tobacco has earned its moniker; four tobacco companies control 75% of the world's cigarette market. The only exception is China: the world's largest cigarette market is controlled by the state-owned China National Tobacco Company.

British American Tobacco (LSE: BATS) is the world's number two tobacco company and the UK's largest, with a market value more than twice that of Imperial Tobacco (LSE: IMT).

In 2011, BAT sold 705 billion cigarettes globally, a 0.4% reduction on 2010. Despite this, it managed to improve operating margins by more than 2 percentage points to an enviable 35.8%.

Smoking profits

BAT's operating profits rose by 9% in 2011, from £4,318m to £4,721m. Revenue rose by just 3%, highlighting the company's firm grip on costs.

Diluted earnings per share rose by 11%, a result which was reflected directly in an 11% dividend increase. This takes the total dividend for 2011 to 126.5p, a 4% yield at current prices.

BAT shares have long been a favourite with income seekers and 2011's results will do nothing to change this -- especially as BAT Chairman Richard Burrows reiterated the company's policy of paying out 65% of earnings as dividends.

Legal BATtles

As a large tobacco company, BAT naturally feels that governments around the world are conspiring against it. One common complaint from the company is about the negative effects of excise duty increases and the encouraging effect these have on smuggling activity.

While the link between high excise rates and smuggling is well proven, BAT's latest battle -- against plain packaging -- is less clear cut. Australia is planning to introduce mandatory plain packaging for cigarettes this year, in an effort to reduce smoking rates.

All four big tobacco companies have launched legal challenges against the Australian plain packaging rules, which are due to come into effect in December 2012.

BAT is due in court in April to contest the plain packaging rules. It will allege that preventing it from using its logos equates to trademark theft; if BAT is successful, other governments considering plain packaging rules might abandon the idea.

Safer than smoking

Investing in BAT is a much safer bet than consuming its products. It has near-perfect diversification across its global markets and its large size and cash generative nature means that it can cope with any short-term problems.

BAT's forward earnings should also be boosted by a massive £1.25bn share buyback programme which was confirmed by BAT in its results.

If you're looking for a stable, blue chip income share and are not ethically opposed to its business, BAT should definitely be on your short list.

More from Roland Head:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

F958B 24 Feb 2012 , 9:39am

This share buyback - at high-teens P/E - is one which I certainly would disapprove if I was a shareholder of BATS (I hold IMT).

A high-teens P/E is effectively a 6% return on invested capital (in this case, repurchased shares). I would expect BATS' cost of capital (interest charge on borrowings) going forward to be in the 5.5% range, leaving very little margin of profit for the repurchases.

At those valuations, the money would be better returned to investors as dividends, or used to pay-down debt.

There is a time and place for buybacks, but this is not one of them.

zoolook 24 Feb 2012 , 10:19am

Whilst on balance I would prefer the returned money in an increased dividend rather than buybacks I think that a point that is often missed with buybacks is that there is also a commensurate saving to the companies dividend bill. The better the yield the bigger the benefit to the companies coffers.

Mari11ion 24 Feb 2012 , 11:36am

The main problem with plain packaging is that it makes smuggling and the sale of counterfeit goods very much easier, resulting in less duty to the government.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.