Powerful Profits Push Drax Closer To Biomass

Published in Company Comment on 21 February 2012

Will Drax get what it needs from the government's electricity market reforms?

Drax Group (LSE: DRX) is the second coal-fuelled company to report good profits in the last week. The first, Hargreaves Services (LSE: HSP), supplies much of the coal used by Drax in the Drax Power Station, which generates about 7% of the UK's electricity.

Generating electricity by burning coal remains profitable. Drax's revenue rose from £1,648.4m to £1,835.9m in 2011, and operating profits rose by 31%, from £279.2m to £366.2m.

However, a combination of factors led to a reduction in underlying earnings per share from 64p in 2010 to 56p in 2011. In line with Drax's admirable policy of paying out 50% of earnings to shareholders as dividends, this also means the company's total dividend has fallen, from 32p to 27.8p, a yield of 5.3% at the time of writing.

Carbon Apocalypse 2013

In 2011, Drax produced 11.9m tonnes of CO2 emissions in excess of its 9.5m tonne allowance under the UK National Allocation Plan, part of the EU carbon emissions trading scheme.

This is more profitable for Drax than burning low-carbon fuels, despite the fact that credits for these extra emissions have to be purchased. The problem is that the current scheme ends this year, and burning coal is set to become more expensive.

In April 2013, the government's Electricity Market Reform package will be launched, which, according to Drax, will make "will result in coal generation becoming progressively and relatively less economic than other major forms of generation like gas, nuclear and renewables".

More subsidies, please

In 2011, Drax burned 1.3m tonnes of sustainable biomass fuels, alongside 9.1m tonnes of coal, generating 7% of the UK's renewable power. Drax is now confident that it could convert to become a biomass-fuelled power station and will invest £50m this year to increase its biomass capacity to 20%.

This is necessary to get some of the benefits offered in the Electricity Market Reform package -- but Drax is lobbying for more support before it commits to a wholesale switch to biomass.

On the brink?

The real question is whether Drax really will go under if sufficient subsidies are not available or whether this is a kind of brinkmanship designed to maximise shareholder returns from burning biomass.

I don't have access to that information, but my instinct is that Drax's current protests are a negotiating tactic and that it will survive quite well on a gradually changing balance of coal and biomass.

I suspect that Drax and its appealing yield will be around for some years to come. Let me know if you agree in the comments below.

> Get the latest on investing and the markets from the desk of David Kuo -- join The Motley Fool Collective today.

More from Roland Head:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Olitom 21 Feb 2012 , 11:19am

I think the real value has gone here. I bought a year ago at 396p after reading this here: http://www.fool.co.uk/news/investing/company-comment/2011/02/22/drax-fires-up-the-yield.aspx
- selling at 530p and bagging some mega divis along the way. It's still OK today, but not the big bargain it was IMO.

Soicowboy 21 Feb 2012 , 5:08pm

I sold out after the results this morning.

Whatever happens re: subsidies etc, substantial capital investment will be required over the next few years. Gearing will be up, FCF will be down.
Not attractive.

eccyman 21 Feb 2012 , 6:23pm

Is "biomass" just a buzzword for what the rest of us refer to as "wood"?

andyframe 22 Feb 2012 , 12:08am

I hope that biomass is not another name for wood. Wood smoke is extremely carcinogenic and wood is hardly low carbon.

alsirat 22 Feb 2012 , 8:36am

DRAX produces 7% of UK electricity. Doesn't this suggest the company has got the Government over a barrel?

paulgmoody 22 Feb 2012 , 9:56am

@eccyman and andyframe

Biomass isn't just wood - it can cover a wide range of materials of biological origins, plant or animal based. For example, Longannet power station in Scotland has been co-firing 'human derived waste' with coal and yes, that particular biomass is as fragrant as you think it might be! Wood and wood waste is popular due to the amount produced and availablility.

tru2me 22 Feb 2012 , 4:50pm

Wood smoke is extremely carcinogenic and wood is hardly low carbon.

@andyframe as far as I am aware wet wood is far more carcinogenic & produces higher carbon emissions.

I know this from speaking to chimney sweeps on the subject. Their interest of course, the choking up of chimneys or rather how quickly this happens.

mackeson29 23 Feb 2012 , 4:33pm

'and wood is hardly low carbon'

It is surely the only true 'carbon neutral' fuel ?

It only releases the CO2 that it has spent its lifetime consuming.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.