Another Share Slump From SuperGroup

Published in Company Comment on 8 February 2012

Weaker sales send the Superdry owner's share price southwards once again.

Shareholders in fashion brand SuperGroup (LSE: SGP) must feel like they are riding a roller-coaster. In less than two years as a London-listed company, the Superdry owner's share price has lurched up and down like a yo-yo.

SuperGroup, super shares?

SuperGroup came to the London Stock Exchange in March 2010, raising £120 million in an initial public offering priced at 500p a share, which valued the group at £375 million. In less than a year, its share price had almost quadrupled, briefly reaching nearly £19 in February 2011.

Alas, as with all 'fad' fashion brands, SuperGroup has been unable to maintain the breakneck sales growth of its early years. As its market (affluent young adults) becomes increasingly saturated, the clothing manufacturer has seen a slowdown in its sales growth.

Hence, the past 12 months have been brutal for SuperGroup's shareholders, as its share price came crashing back to earth. As I write, SuperGroup shares change hands at 576p, down 124p, which means that they have plunged 18% on Wednesday morning.

The reason for this fall is a profit warning brought on by slower sales growth. In the 13 weeks to 29 January, retail sales grew almost 28% to nearly £79 million. However, in the 39 weeks to 29 January, sales rose almost 31% to £152 million, so this trend has weakened recently.

The slowdown in wholesale sales was even more marked, with SuperGroup reporting sales up 18% to £24 million in the latest quarter. This compares badly with the 55% growth reported for the three most recent quarters, producing sales of £87 million.

Overall group sales were ahead 25% at £103 million for 13 weeks, versus 39% growth and sales of £239 million for 39 weeks.

Sensible to sell?

What's more, SuperGroup warned that its full-year profits would be "towards the lower end of the range of market expectations" of between £50 million and £54.1 million. In effect, this is a modest profit warning.

In its latest announcement, the retailer warned: "Following a solid Christmas trading period, which saw like-for-like retail sales of 9.3% in December, there has been a slowdown in the last three weeks of January."

Given that SuperGroup's go-go sales growth is stumbling, it's no surprise that investors rushed for the exits, sending its share price sinking yet again. Even so, the group's roll-out plan has continued, adding four new outlets to its portfolio of 76 standalone stores and 74 concessions.

Following today's fall, SuperGroup shares trade on a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 14.5 and offer a prospective dividend yield of a tiny 0.6%, covered 11.4 times. Given its recent setback, SuperGroup's shares seem rather expensive to me.

Superdry could become the latest in a long list of fashion brands that became overexposed and, in time, unfashionable. After all, how many Superdry-branded T-shirts, hoodies and waterproof coats can a person want?

> Here's your free Essential Investor Kit. Over the next few weeks, you'll get share ideas, a sector report and much, much more. Don't miss out!

More from Cliff D'Arcy:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

CunningCliff 08 Feb 2012 , 12:17pm

To investors in clothing brands, I would say: always remember that fashion is fiercely fickle. Today's must-wear items become tomorrow's dusters! ;0)

Cliff

TMFBoing 08 Feb 2012 , 1:58pm

"After all, how many Superdry-branded T-shirts, hoodies and waterproof coats can a person want?"

None?

Alan

theRealGrinch 08 Feb 2012 , 4:27pm

with the shares at 1800p Prabhat Sakya was recommending as a buy. read the article http://www.fool.co.uk/news/investing/company-comment/2011/02/07/super-name-super-company.aspx?source=isesitlnk0000001&mrr=0.10

and the rest of us warning at this overpriced cack.

MDW1954 09 Feb 2012 , 10:18am

Personally, I think the demographic is dreadful. Can't see it, myself.

star517 09 Feb 2012 , 7:08pm

Superdry was prolific a short time ago, probably due to the fact that it was just as fashionable but more affordable than its competitors. But their innings has been short, and now they really need to pull something out of their sleeve.

Perhaps they could learn some lessons from Jack Wills. When their brand became so prolific among irritating adolescents that they could no longer bear the illusion of exclusivity, they launched a 'grown-up' sub-brand. They've also done a pretty good job bringing the allure of a 'preppy' 'British' label into overseas markets who think we all wear flat caps and carry walking sticks. Unfortunately for us, they aren't publicly traded.

vinchainsaw 10 Feb 2012 , 2:08pm

Problem is their clothes are outer-wear, essentially raincoats.

How many of those do you need? And, if theyre decent quality, they last for years.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.