Sainsbury's Best Yet Doesn't Budge Share Price

Published in Company Comment on 11 January 2012

Sainsbury's underlying value isn't adequately reflected in its share price.

During bull markets, investors sometimes deride the stalwarts. And one of the most derided stocks around has to be J Sainsbury (LSE: SBRY). The shares have done next to nothing for two decades.

This broadly matches the performance of the shops that have trundled along, but have been left in the wake of their faster-growing rivals, whose share prices have also reacted accordingly.

But when investing times are hard, the dogged performance and balance sheet strength of Sainsbury is like a soothing balm.

It was for this reason that the boring old supermarket chain became my second largest holding back in the depths of despair of early October last year, around 280p.

As I pointed out with the interim results, Sainsbury is tantamount to being valued as a property investor that happens to sell groceries and other stuff from the property it owns. So any money it makes in that process is almost a bonus.

And making money it most certainly has been -- better than its main rivals, it would seem. Wednesday's trading statement speaks of a "record-breaking" Christmas. Like-for-like sales, ignoring petrol and new-store sales, were up by 2.1% in the 14 weeks to 8 January from a year earlier. Non-food and local store sales have done particularly well. Sainsbury even managed to gain some Christmas market share from its rivals, and online sales are growing rapidly.

What the company didn't say was whether we can expect any change in earnings. As a result, the share price is almost unchanged at 305p, just a smidgeon north of its NTAV per share of around 300p.

The conventional market wisdom seems to be that Sainsbury has insufficient brand equity in a market where consumers can shift choice so easily. So it gets gradually squeezed out. This is why the shares are priced around their NTAV.

For me, the trading statement helps demonstrate that this is wrong. And the company remains something of a sitting duck.

I think Sainsbury will grow. I don't welcome with open arms a shopping future where megastore chains supply everything we need in life (online or in person), while metaphorical tumbleweeds roll down the high street. But that doesn't mean it can't happen. We vote with our feet.

Patience is clearly required here. I just hope it doesn't take another 20 years. But the yield in the meantime of over 5% will help keep me in groceries.

>  Our latest free report has just been released. Make sure you don't miss '10 Steps to Making a Million'

More from David Holding:

> David owns shares in Sainsbury.  

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

LARFIELD 11 Jan 2012 , 1:14pm

I am (sadly) a very long term holder of Sainsbury -around 10 years & only once (& briefly) due to a potential take-over, was it above my buy price which was not at a spike either. I use the divis. (which have never been more than OK for the sector) as the excuse for retention & because I like shopping at their stores - which is no longer a valid argument as the wife shops on-line with an alternative retailer.
Years back I recall reading one of those endless reports comparing the 4 largest food retailers & the point was made on the comparative price efficiency of delivering products to the shelves & it was here that Sainsbury fell so woefully behind the likes of Tesco. It struck the author at the time that this was not something that Sainsbury was properly addressing & anyway the gap between them & Tescos (the most efficient in this vital area) was too great to be bridged any time in the forseeable... do you have access to any data which might adjust this perception?
As a separate issue: I am unconvinced by the argument of viewing Sainsbury as a property investment. I am aware that this is not the only issue but it is a very material point that these assets can hardly be considered as very liquid (as properties go) after all these stores can only really be used, primarily, for food retailing & if Sainsbury was to sell them, what company would be allowed to buy them, I wonder?

JGH03 11 Jan 2012 , 1:29pm

Your link to the chart on Yahoo Finance compares Sainsbury with TSCO (Tractor Supply Company) rather than TSCO.L (Tesco).

Illiswilgig 11 Jan 2012 , 2:06pm

Ah, the old Tractor Supply Co dodge. I've noticed this before but never investigated the share. Looking at the share price graph I'm now a little disappointed I didn't hit the that button when I bought Tesco shares a few years ago - they've done alright mind you, having doubled, but I'd have been better off buying the tractor supply co by mistake by the looks of it :-)

A great article, and thanks for it, but methinks a similar confusion over the top and bottom lines. You state 'And making money it most certainly has been -- better than its main rivals, it would seem' - but it seems that you meant 'making sales, it most certainly has been' as we have no information regarding the profits? It remains to be seen whether the increased sales are transformed into increased money (for the shareholders) better than its rivals. Seems unlikely to me as both Tesco and Asda have global buying power to call on helping to control the costs of making more sales, ie margin, the thing that Sainsburys just can't match. Not to mention all those lovely growing markets powering the profits of the other two, so I shall be looking forward to my increased dividends again from Tesco (as for each of the last 25years) as it grows relentlessly around the globe.

I'm not trying to do down Sainsbury's achievement, it is good, but is it good enough? They are certainly good at presentation both in store and in their PR. Something that Tesco might like to ponder as they prepare to insert their boot in their pie-hole tomorrow. I wish you luck trying to squeeze some significant growth out of the UK with Sainsbury in the coming years.

Ooh and I'd just like to note that AFAIK like-for-like sales cannot split out store extensions rather than new stores, so you do need to be careful interpreting figures where two companies may have differing store expansion and new store programmes. I'm not sure that like-for-like figures are much help in comparing these huge businesses they are so open to other variables,

cheers

Mark (Shops in Sainsbury(keeps me out of Waitrose) and buys Tesco Shares).


vinchainsaw 11 Jan 2012 , 2:14pm

I hope for your sake I am not a typical Sainsburys shopper, because then youre in for a torrid time.

For as long as I can remember I shopped at Sainsburys through preference.
Towards the middle of last year, when I lost my job through redundancy, I began re-evaluating how and where I was spending my money.
Through this I started shopping around and to my surprise found Sainsburys to be very expensive indeed when compared to other supermarkets.
Nowadays I get up early on a Friday and buy my meat en bulk at Farringdon meat market.
Likewise I buy all my branded goods at Tesco or Lidl and sometimes stop at Iceland to pick up coffee, cooldrink etc as I pass it on the way home.

geddinquick 11 Jan 2012 , 3:18pm

The Tesco price comparison link is now correct - though I quite liked the tractor supply co. comparison! :-)

SevenPillars 12 Jan 2012 , 10:51am

Cheaper today due to Tesco's price effect. Mayan traders at work I think. Is it the end of the world?

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.