Cable & Wireless -- Renaissance Or Dead Man Walking?

Published in Company Comment on 29 June 2011

Cable & Wireless stuns the market again. Is it time to throw in the towel?

So the rose-tinted spectacles through which the board of Cable and Wireless Worldwide (LSE: CW) was viewing the world have been cleaned up to reveal a slightly less polished view of reality.

Tuesday's profits warning was the third in a year and saw the departure of the CEO, around £180m wiped off the company's valuation in one day, and a halving off next year's planned dividend to 2.25p -- though the company will honour the 3p due to us shareholders on 11 August if agreed at the AGM on 21 July, which I would imagine will be "entertaining" to say the least.

The former Financial Director -- who fell on his sword for cautioning his fellow directors of exactly such a scenario -- has been proved right in hindsight. 

Meanwhile, the man mainly responsible for creating this unseemly state of affairs is now running things as CEO, having already creamed off a cool £10m in bonuses for overseeing a shambles before and since the demerger from sibling Cable and Wireless Communications (LSE: CWC) in March last year. In contrast, the CEO of the latter company has recently shelled out £1.2m on shares.

That's one view anyway.

Blood on the boardroom carpet

The other view is that the company was a high-yielding value candidate displaying some good value credentials, which has had to cut its forward dividend in half in a sensible move to shore up the cash-flow as it explores new business areas -- and the new man now at the executive helm is here to make big things happen as the CEO has departed.

In other words, we're at the start of a renaissance and it's the contrarian's time to buy while there are still bloodstains on the boardroom carpet.

I suppose it all depends on your degree of cynicism, but the recent history since the demerger hasn't been the most glorious chapter in the company's long history. The share price tells its own sorry tale, losing over 60% of its value.

At the foot of this article, you'll see the words we're obliged to include: "David owns shares in Cable and Wireless Worldwide," to which I'd like to add: "...but wishes he didn't!"

The Motley Fool Self Select Stocks & Shares ISA

Invest up to £10,680 per tax year in any of our ISA eligible investments,
with any profits made on your investments free from Capital Gains Tax.*

Our Self Select Stocks & Shares ISA enables you to benefit from all great features
of The Motley Fool Share Dealing Account. You can buy shares in seven
of the world's largest markets with our fully comprehensive dealing account.

Click here to find out more or to open an account

The value of your investments and the income from them can go down as well as up.
You may not get back the full amount you have invested. *Tax laws may be liable to change.

Trust no more

Perhaps more accurately that should read "wishes he hadn't..." bought recently, given the doubt over the FD's departure and the possible masking of bad news, which we now know to be true; that and the whiff of "fat-cats with snouts in the trough" vibe, which does so much to damage shareholder confidence.

But that's all water under the bridge. The only question for investors now is whether there's value at this point. The share price is 46p as I write.

The continued presence of John Pluthero, the man who presided over the demerger, now as CEO, won't do much to cheer most shareholders. Pluthero received £10m in payouts in 2009-10,while the outgoing CEO Jim Marsh got a mere £9m.

Your view on this kind of pay will depend on whether you think it's necessary to attract the world's best talent. My view is that it's simply immoral. But I digress.

Tuesday's third time unlucky warning comes as the company is seeing declines across all its business areas -- whereas the previous two were put down to public sector cuts. We're now told EBITDA will be 5-10% below expectations; with a consequent effect on cash flow, hence the halving of the future dividend.

Pluthero's plans to accelerate the company's investment in cloud computing has also impacted earnings. But this is still where he sees the necessary growth coming, as C&W Worldwide's legacy businesses, in traditional telephony services, are in decline.

Benefit of the doubt

From this point, the company has a tough job ahead in rebuilding the confidence of its owners. That will only come from bottom line performance, rather than the platitudes we're getting at the moment.

On balance as a shareholder, I'm prepared to give the company the benefit of the doubt for now, given its low forward earnings multiple, low gearing and reasonably good asset base; that and the "blood on the carpet" basis that we're surely near the bottom -- though would much prefer to see a new broom sweep clean the mess here.

Of particular relevance, of course, is that C&W Worldwide recently turned down a c.£300m bid (equivalent to over 11p per share) for its international assets from Pacnet, a telecoms company based in Hong Kong and Singapore. The hope now is that another bidder comes along and the company is reportedly "open to all considerations". 

It may be that radical action will be required to see the value.

More from David Holding:

> David owns shares in Cable and Wireless Worldwide and Cable and Wireless Communications.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

onceseen 29 Jun 2011 , 12:13pm

It simply reinforces the wisdom of the maxim sell on a profit warning. At this stage one could possibly hold on in the short termfor a dead cat bounce and maybe more bid interest.

MrContrarian 29 Jun 2011 , 12:32pm

Broker comment on http://ftalphaville.ft.com/marketslive today:

Morgan Stanley: 'The appointment of the CWW divisional CEO as Executive Chairman and then Chairman of the new de-merged company (with no reduction in salary, in fact a total remuneration above that of the Vodafone Chairman), and now CEO again raises serious governance concerns in our view, as does the simultaneous elevation of the Senior Independent Director to Chairman. the CEO appointment was made without a search for alternatives, which again raises governance concerns and we think may be questioned by shareholders. This is particularly the case because the combined CWW and CWC share price is 83p, versus around 100p when John Pluthero arrived from Energis in 2006. In the intervening period management has been paid a total of more than £35m, most of it in what is now CWW, and well above the actual cash generation of the division / company. Throughout this period the new CEO has been heavily involved in the business, judging from company statements and the level of remuneration'

SevenPillars 29 Jun 2011 , 1:31pm

Ah, the trials and tribulations of buy and hold.

Management seem to be doing alright though.

kiffberet 29 Jun 2011 , 1:45pm

The management of this company are just like a haunted house: when the walls start bleeding and voices keep saying 'GET OUT!!', you'd be wise to do just that.

DIYIncome 29 Jun 2011 , 4:35pm

First HOME, then CW - what next for us HYPers?

F958B 29 Jun 2011 , 6:09pm

DIY Income

HYP-ers should consider eliminating the highest-yielding 10% of companies and select the second yield decile.
The very highest yielders are often yield traps. The high-ish yielders just below them often make great investments in terms of income, income growth and capital growth.

eccyman 29 Jun 2011 , 8:45pm

Let's not forget the customers. At this end of the telecoms industry customers value stability. Telecom links provide a vital part of business infrastructure and you can't replace them at the drop of a hat

Many potential and real customers of C&W will be reading of their problems and going elsewhere.

VeryJolly 29 Jun 2011 , 9:35pm

"Pluthero received £10m in payouts in 2009-10,while the outgoing CEO Jim Marsh got a mere £9m... it's simply immoral"

Hear, hear, but I think 'immoral' is an understatement.

How anyone can justify this kind of payment when such a huge percentage of the world's population is still living in dire poverty is beyond me. Who are these people and how do they sleep at night?

According to the World Bank, in 2001, 1.1 billion people lived on below $1 a day and 2.7 billion lived on less than $2 a day - since when these data have become worse!

So how can a couple of people justify pay of £20m in two years?

I realise there are lots of people with vast wealth - but it's more usually in the form of assets / companies' shares etc which is a different thing as these are generally wealth-generating and employ people etc - but two people being paid in cash / close to cash is immoral and then some IMO - even if they'd done a great job.

The fact that they clearly haven't simply makes the payment even more ludicrous - but doesn't make it any more or less moral.

bouleversee 30 Jun 2011 , 1:07am

One can hardly argue that it's necessary to pay obscene salaries in order to attract the best talent when it clearly doesn't. I simply don't understand why the major shareholders allow them to get away with it. I hope they will now vote against the remuneration report, as I certainly shall. I also intend to vote against Pluthero's reappointment as a director; in fact, I think I shall vote against all the reappointments. They must have skins like rhinos. Wish I could go to the AGM and see the fireworks.

popsranola 30 Jun 2011 , 2:05pm

Good is to hold both cable and wireless worlwide and cable and wireless communication...........It has a good name sure source revenue, the economic condition is bad considering the entire market worldwide.....Sooner or later it will be subject of a bid from big telephone operator.....Will it happen.......The case very strong in the future.........

eccyman 02 Jul 2011 , 7:21pm

According to today's FT. The head of C&W (not sure which arm as I can't tell which is which and I work in the industry) gets paid more than the head of Vodafone. Given that Vodafone is more than 50 times the size of C&W it strikes me that C&W is now no more than a cash cow for it's own management.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.