Time's Running Out For HMV

Published in Company Comment on 5 January 2011

Its share price plunges on worries over its banking covenants.

When music sharing software like Napster and later iTunes began changing how kids bought and consumed music, I don't remember anyone mentioning the British weather.

Getting music over the Internet was free or at least cheaper, it conveniently delivered it straight in digital form for MP3 players, and it also saved a bus trip into town. But avoiding a snowball in the face? The pioneers missed a pitch.

On Wednesday, however, HMV (LSE: HMV), the 80-year old purveyor of recorded music, blamed the recent icy weather on a 10% slump in Christmas sales.

Worse, it alluded to potential banking problems, stating:

"Given the difficult trading conditions over Christmas and the likely outturn for the year, the Board now expects that compliance with the April covenant test under the Group's bank facility will be tight and is taking further mitigating actions during the next four months to address this."

The slow death of the CD is one thing, but the whiff of banking woes is more immediately bad news. Not surprisingly HMV shares are down 25% as I write. Over the past year the share price has fallen 75%.

Slip-sliding sales

Superficially, management's claim that the snow hit music sales seems credible, when you compare recent trading with last year.

Like-for-like sales at HMV's UK and Ireland stores were down 13.6% in the five weeks to 1 January compared to last year, and 14% lower over the past ten weeks, which pretty much covers the cold snap.

Yet I don't see why HMV should blame the snow, as sales were already declining. In the six months to 23 October, like-for-like sales fell 11.5%, and while the summer weather was nothing to write home about, I don't remember icicles on Oxford Street in June.

What's more, like-for-like sales at its Waterstones division were roughly flat over Christmas, which is a relatively great result. Are book buyers made of more snow proof stuff? Hardly -- it's yet more evidence that music retailing is in long-term decline.

To be fair, the company does add that 'underlying entertainment markets' remain weak, notwithstanding 'strong sales' of certain key products.

I suspect the latter are video games related. Shareholders in Game (LSE:GAME) -- itself down over 4% on the HMV release -- will have to wait for their own trading update. It is due on 13 January.

Shareholders take cover

As for HMV's debts, as of that half-yearly report, underlying net debt stood at £151 million, having ballooned from £88 million on the back of the acquisition of the MAMA live music group. The acquisition is making a positive contribution, but it's negligible in the grand scheme of things.

Can HMV afford its debt? Interest payments of £7 million a year seem small in comparison with HMV's turnover, which is not far short of £2bn.

Yet while Wednesday's trading update says profits will be at the bottom range of expectations, or around £46 million, this is before exceptional charges. Given the company also announced it is to close 60 of its 700-odd stores as well as seeking £10 million in further cost savings, some sort of charge may loom. 

The only real bright spot is the modest turnaround at Waterstones. I wonder if HMV may consider selling Waterstones to satisfy its bankers. It's hardly the best circumstances in which to achieve a great price, which may mean the other unattractive alternative -- a hugely discounted rights issue -- is now inevitable.

True, according to analysts at Investec the shares have a net asset value of 28p, but investors who witnessed the decline of Woolworths will take that figure with a pinch of salt (or grit).

Needless to say, HMV's dividend yield of 13.5% is now a fantasy figure that is certain to be heavily slashed.

Going down

While HMV will be just the first company to blame the snow for bad trading over Christmas, it will also be among the most disingenuous.

Generations of teeny-boppers, punks and grunge fans got to the shops whatever the weather -- the reason the current lot aren't going to HMV is because they no longer have to.

For the past few years HMV has killed off or acquired rivals such as Fopp and Zavvi as well as the bookseller Ottakar's, even as digital distribution of music and the increasing dominance of online retailers like Amazon and Play.com -- not to mention aggressive expansion by the supermarkets -- has undermined High Street music megastores like HMV and Waterstones.

HMV has vastly expanded its retail space and taken out its competitors -- the so-called Last Man Standing argument. But the net result is it's now a giant retailer on wafer-thin margins saddled with banking worries and selling less of its core product every month.

Investors beware: In the movies, the Last Man staggering down the High Street often turns out to be a zombie.

More company comment:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

LiberalThug 05 Jan 2011 , 1:21pm

I wouldn't touch HMV with a barge pole - I just don't believe the business model is robust enough for the digital age.

theRealGrinch 05 Jan 2011 , 2:27pm

breaking it up is looking more likely. it should have happened years ago. waterstone is a millstone.

SevenPillars 05 Jan 2011 , 3:00pm

I do wonder if the Russian billionaire who has been buying into HMV can see something which the usual doom and gloomers can't? I've been interested (not a buyer I may add) for some time about HMV's stock market performance, especially as it has been on the short sellers hit list for some time. I once read that it is consistantly one of the most shorted stocks on the market.

It's fall from grace seem to begin with the board turning down a private buyout bid from Permira back in 2006 of about 205p a share. At that time, the market considered HMV to be one of the darlings of the retail sector with a P/E in the mid/upper 20's. More or less ever since then the share price has slid even with good news. HMV has increased revenue, EPS and profits most years, it's dividend got to silly levels around 13% (you can check all this on the MF site). It isn't as if it is a loss making company, although there are clearly many problems it faces, debt, servicing of debt, some questionable acquisitions which added to debt etc. A direct comparison with Woolies is not fully justified as I think Woolworths debts were much higher than HMV when it went under and it was very much an old fashioned pick and mix, mix and match type store that tried to do a bit of everything and didn't change at all.

It seems to me that the market has decided that this one will go bust because of the sector it is in and the technology it is involved with. They've constantly ignored any good news about the company, I mean there are plenty of sexy loss making mining/energy/tech type companies on the market that the experts want to ramp up the price of, so you wouldn't be interested in an old style retailer that actually makes money would you? The market has placed a going bust bet on HMV and it's difficult to know what level of improved performance will change that view, after all, when they announced profits increasing it didn't change the market perception did it?

I wouldn't buy it as the market clearly dislikes the company and expects it to go bust, but I wouldn't be surprised if that Russian billionaire makes a bid for it at some stage. I did read that there is no HMV equivalent in Russia and he may want to open a brand name entertainment store there. Who knows? In the mean time, HMV still makes profits, but perhaps not enough to please its bankers. The key for HMV may be whether the banks will continue to support it or instead believe the market traders.

TMFBoing 05 Jan 2011 , 3:11pm

Hi Owain,

Sadly, I think you're spot on.

I did buy the "last man standing" story, and I do think there will still be a decent market for high street music, video and games sales for some time to come.

But it really doesn't look as if that market is anywhere near big enough to sustain anything the size of the current HMV.

I regularly visit the HMV stores in Liverpool and Manchester, and they always seem to be busy - but they're in key central shopping locations with very high footfall, and an early mistake I made was to extrapolate that to the company as a whole - a mistake I corrected not long after the Q3 results showed falling LFL sales, and I sold out.

I can see a remnant of HMV being profitable, with a much smaller number of stores, but high value ones in key locations - but in its current shape, I think wall has writing on it.

Best,
Alan

Gibbox 05 Jan 2011 , 3:37pm

or a bid from Amazon... remove a competitor (books, CD's and games) and rebrand the profitable retail space - I seem to remember talk of Amazon looking at the options of a high street presence about a year ago... a sort of click and collect from your local store model for people who didn't want to rely on delivery... mind you, don't Argos do this?

goodvalueshares 05 Jan 2011 , 3:51pm

SevenPillars- Full marks for your article, a highly objective account of the situation. I particulary agree that it does not deserve a comparison with woolies- after all it has consistently delivered profits over the last 5 years.

The banking covenant news is pretty worrying, but even HMV reckon full year profits will be at the lower end of analyst expectations (around the £48million mark) I can certainly see why the Russian investor might be interested- a profitable company valued at a pittance. Every instinct of mine tells me to salvage what is left of my holding, but my contrarian mindset is keeping me in play- retail is unpopular and value lurks in the sector. We shall see which triumphs...

meadowview2 05 Jan 2011 , 4:05pm

bought in at 76p

am thinking just to keep holding it. lost too much to crystalise now

wish i shorted couple of weeks back

matthowes 05 Jan 2011 , 4:15pm

Yeah a Sorry state of affairs. But one I think can be salvaged if the banks give them the time. There are profits in Live Music [and this part you can't download]. I'm contrarian too and so I'm holding onto my shares and praying ! Also as the younger folks are the ones doing the downloading it would be worth HMV's while to target an older audience who still like actually owning CD's & DVD's. Games & Electronics are also worth expanding [little downloading again]. As to Waterstones, in reallity they should sell this while it's up for the best price they can get as things like the Ipad with Kindle books have already stopped me shopping for books when I can browse at the airport and download to read on the plane....

SevenPillars 05 Jan 2011 , 4:31pm

The HMV decision to close some of its stores must make sense. Certainly in the city near where I live there are two Waterstone's within 3 minutes walking distance of each other. I've no idea if one is a more specialist shop, or if they both make a profit, but what I do know is that the one in the indoor city shopping centre has a footfall many times that of the one tucked away in a back street just 3 minutes away. I do wonder if it will be one of the 60 shops to close.

As for Waterstone's, perhaps they should sell it, but it is never a good time to do it when you look desperate as it looks like a fire sale. Someone will buy it, but only on the cheap. Difficult to get value if you are a forced seller.

TMFFlaneur 05 Jan 2011 , 4:37pm

Great comments, thanks.

@matthowes -- Interesting idea, the "Q" if music stores. However, even if was feasible I doubt you'd start setting up such an operation in the place that HMV is in now, which is basically prime High Street locations designed to net hordes of passing teens. (Also, wouldn't that market have been similar to the now-departed-from-London-at-least Borders?)

Re: The Russian Billionaire, I agree something is clearly up there, and have read the press speculation. But in my experience buying a company in expecation of a bid bailing you out is a highly risky strategy.

Re: Woolworths, fair points on HMVnot being quite the serial loss maker (yet?!) -- I was really just remarking that (from memory) that Woolworths was trading below book value but when push comes to shove the assets weren't worth diddly to shareholders.

drfuzz 05 Jan 2011 , 4:55pm

Sevenpillars, good analysis and as someone who bought in at 63p I want to agree with you, but...

As soon as the word "covenants" comes, huge alarm bells go off! I'd held on to HMV based on your arguements above (I'd concluded very similar to what you did) plus the fact it didn't have a debt problem so there was no immediate risk of insolvency. For the first time, there are warning signs that there is a debt problem, and the outlook is not particularly good for any retailers so this problem will only likely get worse. After the interims in Dec, I extrapolated what HMVs FY profits would look like if like for like sales for the whole year were down by the same amount as the first half. I concluded they'd be about 10m. This statement is confirming that sales continue to decline at a similar rate. Yet somehow the management are talking about profits of 46m for the year, but I don't believe it (unless they've 1. substantially increased margins - which I servely doubt or 2. are including exceptional disposals such as Oxford St store for 13m in their estimates). Incidentally, I'm not saying the management is lying, just not telling the whole truth...

It now seems like a long way back for HMV, I'm sad to say. My feeling is its entering white knight territory (i.e. where only a white knight can save it!) Like other holders I'm tempted to stick with it in case this white night materialises, but I also have a feeling it will halve again by final results if one doesn't, so as of tomorrow morning I'm out! Only bonuses are (1) I got one big divvie, and (2) It was my smallest PF holding anyhow!

matthowes 05 Jan 2011 , 5:25pm

Borders stores in London and Cambridge were great stores - I for one was sad to see the UK ones all go. The US ones are looking a little sad now too.... However HMV could change some of it's stores to a more adult format - after all it has 60 it suddenly doesn't want. Also the US has more adult orientated record stores that are successful if a bit smaller in corporate terms.

SevenPillars 05 Jan 2011 , 6:21pm

To clarify my position, as indicated I wouldn't be a buyer for the reasons given and I also wouldn't suggest that those who did buy at a much higher price simply sit and hold and hope for the best. Everyone will have to make a decision based on how comfortable they feel about holding these shares going forward.

I agree with those who say it will be a bumpy ride. I do feel that HMV has become a victim of what I call a bust bet by the market, in that at times it doesn't seem to matter what the company does, the market is always looking for the next bit of bad news to mark it down. If there isn't bad news, then the market creates some by saying that its business model is bust and no one will be buying cd's, dvd's etc, anymore. Of course, in the 70's they said that home taping would kill the music industry. It didn't, the technology simply moved on and the best in the business adapted to change.

As another example of how the market overreacted to some bad HMV news, this summer when sales were down the shares fell heavily on the back of it. HMV put some blame on the World Cup, so I decided to check what happened to the company after the 2006 World Cup. Guess what, HMV's summer results were worse in 2006. Comparing like with like, HMV did better in 2010! Market still marked the shares down and said they were doomed though.

The problem HMV now face is that if the shares fall a lot further and no White (Russian) Knight appears, the banks might get itchy feet and want out. If they pull the rug out then HMV will most likely go under. Having said that the banks did put up the cash so they could buy MAMA Live Music just a year ago, so would they bail out so soon? Unfortunately, a run on HMV's shares, unlike the banks, will not result in a taxpayer bailout and thus a profit making company which so far is still some way off a Woolies type scenario could go to the wall simply because of short selling of the bust bet.

WealthyInvestor 05 Jan 2011 , 9:54pm

For those holding HMV shares this is one of those classic moments when you have to take the emotion out of the situation, look at it calmly and with rational business logic, and realise that no matter what your loss, 26p today is better than 6p two months from now. HMV has been dead in the water for some time, and will ultimately maybe not this year, maybe not next, but will eventually go the way of Woolworths. Avoid at all costs.

mcturra2000 06 Jan 2011 , 7:59am

I've been one of those tiresome bears over on the HMV board.

In my mind, xmas was the final definitive test for HMV as to whether it could stabilise its business or is in terminal decline. Given HMV's recent announcement, it's pretty clear that it has no long-term future.

timgee100 06 Jan 2011 , 10:51am

All good thoughtful commentary.... I've just bought some at 24.5p. Adding them to my Taylor Woodrow, Dixons Group et al portfolio of last-gasp deadbeat (and so far, highly profitable) equities. At current prices HMV is a worthwhile punt, no?

SevenPillars 06 Jan 2011 , 11:55am

timgee100. It certainly is a punt! There may well be a bounce at some stage, especially if the banks are prepared to support the current changes or renegotiate the debt terms which HMV state present them with difficulties. The market may well react positively to such news, but for how long, who knows?

I disagree with a couple of the views here that HMV is in terminal decline or has no future. That just sounds to me like bust bet thinking which is too general and lacks real analysis. Again the comparison with Woolies is being given when they are not alike at all so far. You could have said the same about HMV back in the 70's when home taping was supposedly killing music. You could have said the same when vinyl and video was largely replaced by cd's and dvd's. The technology is changing again and the question is, will HMV move with the times or get left behind.

If you were to look at HMV's results in the last 3-4 years and forget the name of the company or the business they are in you might be forgiven for thinking that it is not doing that bad. Leave aside that some of its business is cyclical with results being better at certain times of the year than others and therefore prone to overreaction on the downside when things don't go so well, but what happend to HMV yesterday is really no different to similar poor returns at other times over the last 5 years or so. So far, there has been no consistancy in the downside of the company when it comes to results, they have been up and down, sometimes good, sometimes bad. Just as the sales of cd's, dvd's, etc in general have been up and down over the last 5 years or so.

If HMV were to suddenly see a big drop off in business as happened with Woolies, then yes I would share the bear analysis, but so far there has been no falling off a cliff in terms of results, or several bad results in a row that clearly indicates trouble. It will be interesting to see what HMV's bottom line figure is when it is announced. If it is well below bottom line expectations then this may give evidence of decline, but I think we need to wait and see.

One final question on HMV's debt. I believe their debt burden went up when they bought Mama live music. This is one of their attempts to diversify and do what the market seems to be telling them they need to do, get away from cd's, dvd's, books etc. It will be ironic if that attempt to diversify, because they took on more debt, now brings them down, especially when prior to the Mama purchase their debt was well under control.

Gibbox 06 Jan 2011 , 11:57am

I've been so tempted to buy in for quite some time now but each time I just can't seem to force my finger to press that buy button (thankfully)... I still seem to be in that situation.... price now 24p

SevenPillars 06 Jan 2011 , 1:13pm

If HMV's share price falls to 6p and that Russian billionaire is for real, he will buy it up and probably take it private. At 6p it's probably chump change to him, especially as it is still making decent profits. He could probably get the debt renegotiated through some of his Russian banking freinds (nudge, nudge). As a private company it wouldn't have to suck up to the over expectations of market analysts, or worry about short sellers sticking the knife in to get a run on whenever there is the slightest bad news. HMV should have taken that Permira offer, as some companies are just not suited to a stock exchange listing. Richard Branson knew that when he took Virgin back private.

WealthyInvestor 06 Jan 2011 , 9:03pm

The comparison to Woolworths is not lacking analysis or thinking. Woolworths went bust because nobody had a reason to walk in there. HMV is in trouble because the reasons to walk in there are getting less and less, with no strategy or vision to turn it around, and lets face it, what can it turn itself into? Music is heading online at a phenomenal rate. HMV will limp on for a while, but this is not a cigar butt investment Buffet style. This one is heading south and then some..... Avoid unless you like losing money.

SevenPillars 06 Jan 2011 , 11:10pm

An example of more balanced analysis as against bust bet analysis.

http://bit.ly/g5ZOvr

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.