What Would Graham Buy?

Published in Company Comment on 27 August 2010

We look at the performance of some Graham portfolios, and consider what he'd buy today.

Good old-fashioned value investing, as espoused by Ben Graham, has served many investors well over the years … except when it hasn't. And that's the problem: Most strategies they have their moments in the sun, but finding that elusive formula that consistently outperforms is a real challenge.

I've been experimenting with Graham's approach over the past couple of years, and thought it was a good time to give an update on progress, and see what makes the cut in today's market.

The results so far

I've run three Graham filters to date, 2 years ago, 18 months ago and 6 months ago, and the results (assuming even weightings) are as follows, excluding dividends:

Portfolio 1 (Aug '08):

 Aug '08 to
Feb '09
Aug '08 to
Feb '10
Aug '08 to
Aug '10
Portfolio 1 (Aug '08)-29.4%11.3%-14.3%
FTSE All-Share-31.6%-4.1%-6.6%

 

Portfolio 2 (Feb '09):

 Feb '09 to
Feb '10
Feb '09 to
Aug '10
Portfolio 2 (Feb '09)76.2%91.0%
FTSE All-Share40.2%38.7%

 

Portfolio 3 (Feb '10):

 Feb '10 to
Aug '10
Portfolio 3 (Feb '10)-7.0%
FTSE All-Share-2.6%

Not the most convincing set of returns, I have to admit.

Bear in mind also that I've just checked the prices at the start and end of each period, and have not been monitoring actively throughout that time. One of Graham's sell signals was if a share price had risen more than 50% since buying; on that basis, many companies would have been dropped before achieving their current levels.

And while we might be tempted to wait for the two-year-old portfolio come come good in the end, two years was the limit of Graham's holding period when applying this strategy.

The car crash that is Findel (LSE: FDL) was enough to push the February 2010 portfolio from outperformance to underperformance; the February 2009 portfolio, on the other hand, has gone from strength to strength.

What to buy today

To satisfy my curiosity, I went on to see what a Graham filter would produce today.

You can find the selection criteria in my biog article on Graham, and I've used ADVFN's Filter-X application to trawl through the data.

Here's your chance to guarantee your place on the next enrolment to Champion Shares PRO! For 2 weeks in September we will be opening our doors to new subscribers to join our remarkable, one-of-a-kind investing service. In order to keep our exclusivity, only a select number of our one million plus readership will be able to join us. This is your chance to guarantee your place! Click here to join the priority waiting list

No company met all ten criteria, and the one that came closest was a company I hadn't heard of before: Bluestar (LSE: BSST).

With a market capitalisation of just £23m, this Chinese digital surveillance company is not really what Graham had in mind -- he had a strong preference for bigger businesses. Small-cap hunters might want to take a closer look at this one, however, and it was discussed recently on our boards.

Reverting to just the major criteria, and restricting the search to companies bigger than £100m, we get the following portfolio:

CompanySectorPrice
(p)
Market
cap
£m
Land Securities (LSE: LAND)Real Estate
Investment Trusts
598.5p4,596
British Land (LSE: BLND)Real Estate
Investment Trusts
447.5p3,968
Balfour Beatty (LSE: BBY)Construction
& Materials
235p1,634
HMV (LSE: HMV)General Retailers58p250
Interserve (LSE: IRV)Support Services194p246
Severfield (LSE: SFR)Industrial
Engineering
201p180
Mountview Est. (LSE: MTVW)Real Estate
Investment Trusts
3,875151

As always when working with filters, it's a good idea to manually check the relevant data for any shortlists or portfolios, as errors are not uncommon. In particular, considering the number of property companies on this list, you might want to take a view on the accuracy of the book value of the assets.

Some of these names, such as Interserve (LSE: IRV), we've also seen on previous Graham filters, so be on the lookout for possible 'value traps'.

Let's see if these can rescue Mr Graham's reputation over the next year.

More on the markets:

> For two weeks in September we will be opening the doors of our Champion Shares PRO newsletter service. In order to keep our exclusivity, only a select number of our readership will be able to join us. This is your chance to guarantee your place! Click here to join the priority waiting list.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

jaizan 27 Aug 2010 , 9:21pm

Evaluating performance over such a short timescale is irrelevant.

How a strategy performs over 10, or preferably 20 years is more relevant.

SanMiguel101 27 Aug 2010 , 10:05pm

Pick a value portfolio of 10 stocks, what would the return have to be over 10 years to be decent? Say 6% a year on average on each stock?!
Is that possible with a Graham portfolio?

SanMiguel101 27 Aug 2010 , 10:10pm

Also, that portfolio has a large exposure to construction, engineering, and housing does it not?

SanMiguel101 28 Aug 2010 , 2:56pm

And 1 more... :)
Have you considered the net gearing of the stocks in portfolio 2? That might account for the large success in the bull run upturn of the bear market in 09 and also for the underperformance in other years. High net gearing = big profits in up turn but quick loss of profits in recessions.

TheThrilla 30 Aug 2010 , 6:26pm

What would Graham buy?

My mate Graham has just bought a four-year-old Nissan Micra, which he is very happy with.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.