Is ITV A Recovery Play?

Published in Company Comment on 17 August 2010

After a solid set of figures, we look at the prospects for ITV.

Over 98% of British households possess a television set and the average person watches TV for more than four and a quarter hours a day. One way to invest in the TV programme business is via ITV (LSE: ITV), Britain's largest free-to-air television station which is entirely supported by advertising revenues and programme sponsorship.

ITV has had a rough few years; particularly 2008 when it lost more than £2.5 billion. However, 2009 has produced a distinct improvement as ITV returned to profitability and its results for the first half of 2010 were surprisingly good.

ITV is a recovery story for investors who've got a strong nerve, especially now that it has signalled its intention to enter the pay-TV market.

Death of a monopoly

I wrote last year about how ITV's profits had fallen sharply in recent years because its monopoly over UK television advertising had been eroded. 

With Britain having gone from just the one commercial channel in the early 1980s to several hundred today, thanks in large part to BSkyB (LSE: BSY) and other broadcasters who use Sky's platform, ITV can no longer offer its advertisers the level of exclusivity that it once could.

If that wasn't bad enough, ITV faces extra competition for the attention of its target audience from the newer forms of home entertainment such as computer games, DVDs and the internet.

The overall effect has caused ITV's ratings to fall sharply, thus reducing its income. The days when 25 million would watch Coronation Street and Inspector Morse are long gone; today's top-rated shows attract less than 10 million.

Lower profits means cheaper TV

When looking at advertising-funded television you should always bear in mind that viewers are not customers. ITV's customers are those businesses which run advertisements on its four stations; ITV sells an audience to advertisers.

ITV has adapted to falling audiences by cutting its costs, in particular by making far fewer dramas. ITV now focuses upon shows which attract a moderately-sized audience at a much lower production cost.

It's this cost cutting which lies behind the explosion in the number of reality TV, house buying, DIY and makeover programmes in recent years. An hour of reality TV can cost less than 10% of the cost of a top-notch period drama, so it's no surprise that the accountants who are the driving force behind the vast array of celebrity pet DIY makeover cookery programmes on television.

The growing market for audiences who watch high quality drama is increasingly shifting to the BBC and pay-TV channels. This is where ITV's new pay-TV venture could be the making of the company (more on this later).

Show me the money

ITV's results for the last five years are as follows. Those of a nervous disposition might care to look away now!

Year20092008200720062005
Total Sales (£ million)1,8792,0292,0822,1812,196
Diluted earnings per share2.3p(65.8p)3.5p5.4p5.3p
Dividend per shareNil0.675p3.15p3.15p3.12p

The last decade has been rough for long-term shareholders, many of whom have probably felt like throwing in the proverbial towel on several occasions. With a steady decline in sales, profits and dividends it's no surprise to find out that ITV's current share price of about 50p is well below what it was five years ago. However, the results for 2009 have given the shares a boost, causing them to rebound from their low of 18p.

In its most recent figures ITV highlighted an adjusted earnings per share figure, one which excludes goodwill write-offs and one-off charges. With ITV writing off almost £2.7 billion worth of intangible assets in 2008, it's prudent to completely ignore the adjusted eps because you cannot reasonably assume that this was the last of the write-offs.

ITV's half-yearly results, published a few weeks ago, made pleasant reading for shareholders as the company returned to profitability, earning 1.8p per share compared to a loss of 1.8p for the first half of 2009.

Looking at ITV's balance sheet we see that it contains £3 billion of assets, of which almost £1 billion is intangible assets. When we take into account the £2.5 billion of liabilities, which includes a pension scheme deficit of almost £450 million, there's nothing there for investors who like their companies to have a tangible net asset value.

The future

The decline in TV audiences means that ITV's advertising rates may come under further pressure. ITV has reacted to the fragmenting market by launching three other channels, ITV2 through 4, which are doing well. 

The most interesting development is that ITV is moving into the pay-TV market having recently announced that it will start broadcasting several high definition subscription channels within the next twelve months.

Whilst ITV lost a fortune on its last venture into pay-TV, the ill-fated ITV Digital, hopefully it will learn from the American cable television networks HBO, Showtime and Starz. These stations have proven that broadcasting to smaller audiences on pay-TV stations can be highly profitable provided that you control your costs.

An interesting development is that BT (LSE: BT-A) is in direct competition with Sky television as it can now offer Sky's sports channels. Should this battle heat up then this could help ITV's position. After all anything which increases your major competitor's costs whilst simultaneously decreasing its income is good for your business (until they turn their attention to you!).

Braver souls than me might well consider ITV as a speculative investment, provided that they are willing to take the view that ITV will continue to reduce its costs and that its pay-TV operations will prove to be profitable. It's going to be a bumpy ride!

More from Tony Luckett:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

CodeGimp 17 Aug 2010 , 4:21pm

Judging by Adam Crozier's track record of achieving little but talking guff for a short time followed by a hasty exit with a multi-million pound golden parachute, the ordinary retail investor would have to be insane to punt so much as a farthing on this dying turd of a business

Mari11ion 17 Aug 2010 , 5:39pm

Multi-channel TV reaches about 90% of the population now, and the rest will get it by the end of Digital Switchover (2.5 years time), at which point free multi-channel TV will be available to everyone, so the audience will be spread out further yet.

I'm not convinced that launching ITV3 and ITV4 in HD is going to be a big draw for subscribers - it's not exactly premium content is it - and HD broadcasting is more expensive (more transmission bandwidth) and more exclusive (not everyone has an HD TV and HD receiver and HD subscription). Also, it is unlikely that such services would have regionalised advertising (more expensive bandwidth required), and TV advertisers don't like nationwide adverts due to it's poor targetting. Doesn't seem like a great strategy to me.

Also, look at Channel 5 right now - they're really beginning to take action to get their costs down and audiences up and are likely to compete much more with ITV.

Netherwood 18 Aug 2010 , 1:15pm

This is a dead duck company. How can it survive with advertising revenue going to other mediums such as google, face book et al. I looked at the company a while back because I thought it had a large back catalogue which it could sell to other platforms. Apparantly is doesn't have. When you compare the Franchise of the BBC with things like period drama and Dr who. What legacy value does ITV have? reality TV!!!

GrahamMiller0 18 Aug 2010 , 5:27pm

I wonder how Apple will play it when they launch iTV. ITV have stated that they will fight to defend their brand. Could be interesting.

HenryScottTuke 19 Aug 2010 , 12:34pm

Netherwood, what makes you say they do not have much of a back catalogue ? The only issues I can see are if the recordings have actually been saved, and who retains the rights. Whatever the quality we like to be taken back to when we were younger, and like music, tv programmes help us do that. The range is vast and goes back to the 1960's ( chat shows -Harty/Parkinson )( pop shows - Jukebox Jury )( dramas - Duchess of Duke Street )(Comedy - the comedians/dick emery/Benny Hill )( talent shows - Opportunity Knocks, New Faces ). What about "This is your life" ( which I believe has never been repeated ). ITV is a light entertainment channel. Whether you like them or not, there would be an audience for most of the programmes made. Some audiences will be small, others large. The trick I think is to offer a lot of the back catalogue on-demand. However I think their current itv-player is a joke. When the programmes actually play, the broadcast quality is poor. As for the technology, the BBC wins hands down. Perhaps they could pay to license the technology from them ? I feel on balance until they come up with a better offer, leave them alone. The only new initiative is older programmes in HD on pay-per-view. I'd rather see programmes I choose than a narrow range in HD. I'd then consider paying.

Netherwood 19 Aug 2010 , 4:02pm

For info here is some discussion from some time ago about ITV Back catalogue for info
ITV is already very active in the secondary exploitation of their programme rights, both in the UK and worldwide. They call it "Global Entertainment", and the detail is pretty well covered in their Annual Report and Accounts - as per their most recent interim statement for example, it's already brought in £55 million so far this year. Unfortunately their website www.globalent.itv.com which gives full details of all their currently available programme rights is only accessible to tv professionals.

As an add on;

By repeatable shows, I mean the ones which are sold to other broadcasters.

The big money is selling your show to the States. I believe, the price depends upon 'quality as well as quantity'. So a Jane Austen, small no hours but high quality, might sell but US broadcasters also want long running series.

In terms of Gameshows or Entertainment shows, there has been huge sums to be made from selling formats.

Unfortunately, ITV did not come up with the format for Millionaire, X factor, nor C4 for Big Brother, did the Beeb do Weakest Link?

For the past decade, it seems the prod library of the furture, is actually owned by independent producers, excluding the Soaps.

A few ideas;

Make a list of ITV's big ratings winners for the last 10, 20 years.

The ones with audiences over 6m and more perhaps more importantly, are long running series.

The next time you see an episode, check the credits for the production company. (Also which channel are you watching that episode on? Many, exc the soaps, are already repeated on the channels owned by Virgin Media).

If not in-house, after the programme has been repeated once, the cut of the repeat fees swings heavilly towards the prod. company.

ITV's biggest downfall, of the past decade, has been to let the new repeatable series, i.e. drama, not gameshows or entertainment, be made by independents (which helps fulfil reg. rules).

The big part of the library which is entirely their own, is the Soaps.

In terms of films, ITV did buy some of the old Rank library (Ealing, Carry-On) but I believe some of the top earners belong to Studio Canal (Vivendi). Don't believe they have much else.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.