Dividend Report Card: BHP Billiton

Published in Company Comment on 30 July 2010

Does BHP Billiton's dividend pass the test?

In the dividend report card series, we analyse financial metrics to begin answering the following questions about a company's dividend:

1. Over time, has this company steadily increased its payouts?

2. How sustainable is the dividend?

3. Does the company have room to further increase the dividend?

For a full explanation of each category, click here for a tutorial.

Today's pupil is BHP Billiton (LSE: BLT), which has a 3% expected yield.

Dividend history

Metric5-Year
Annualised
Growth Rate
Dividend per share21.4%
Diluted earnings per share15.9%

Source: Capital IQ, as of 29 July 2010

BHP Billiton has done a nice job raising its dividend at a rate comparable to earnings growth. This is an ideal pattern because it not only shows that the company has rewarded shareholders in the past, but that it expects strong profitability in the future, as well.

Sustainability

MetricTrailing
12 Months
Final
Grade
Weighting
Report Card
Score
(out of 5)
Interest coverage31.6 times10%5
EPS payout ratio48.6%10%5
FCFE payout ratio>100%30%1

Source: Capital IQ, as of 29 July 2010.

BHP produces more than enough profit to satisfy both its creditors and sustain its dividend, but free cash flow fell off sharply in 2009 as a result of declining profitability (versus 2008) and increased investments. 

The good news is this might have simply been due to the cyclicality of BHP's business. In fact, in 2007 and 2008, BHP generated more than enough free cash flow to cover its dividend and would have scored "5" and "4" in that category, respectively. 

Investors should keep an eye on the company's free cash flow coverage in coming years, but the fact that it scored a "1" during an awkward time in the markets isn't necessarily cause for panic.

Growth

MetricTrailing
12 Months
Final
Grade
Weighting
Report Card
Score
(out of 5)
EPS payout ratio48.6%10%4
FCFE payout ratio>100%20%1
Sustainable growth rate11.7%10%5

Once again, BHP scores low by the free cash flow measure in this period, but the other factors in this category look to be strong. As long as the free cash flow figure works itself out over time, it appears BHP is quite capable of growing its dividend at a good rate over the next five years or so.

Competitors

An "ungraded" section of the dividend report card is to see how a stock's current yield stacks up against its direct competitors. If it's too high relative to competitors' yields, the board could be tempted to slow the growth rate, or vice versa, to bring it more in line with the industry average.

CompanyDividend
Yield
Alcoa (NYSE: AA)1.1%
Anglo American (LSE: AAL)1.7%
Rio Tinto (LSE: RIO)2.1%

BHP Billiton's 3% yield is slightly above its competitors, but there's a reason for that -- unlike the rest of these names, BHP never cut or suspended its dividend in the past few years. 

That's been fantastic news for its shareholders, but all the dividend cuts and suspensions in the industry are a stark reminder that mining and exploration isn't an easy business and when times get tough the dividend is often called into question.

Pencils down!

With all the numbers in, here's how BHP Billiton's dividend scored:

WeightingCategoryFinal Grade
10%History5
 Sustainability 
10%Interest Coverage5
10%EPS Payout Ratio5
30%FCFE Payout Ratio1
 Growth 
10%EPS Payout Ratio4
20%FCFE Payout Ratio1
10%Sustainable growth5
100%Total Score
(out of 5)
2.9
 Final GradeC

A "C" isn't a fantastic grade, but it may not be as bad as it seems. If BHP can resume strong free cash flow generation in coming quarters, the dividend could easily score a "B" or an "A" down the road. 

We'll check back to see how they're doing after a few more reports come in.

Previous dividend report cards:

Coming soon: The Motley Fool will be launching a brand new service focussed on dividend investing. Register your interest and you'll be the first to find out the full details.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

wordofandy 02 Aug 2010 , 3:14am

Dear Todd,
The Report Card series are an excellent idea, promoting "figure delving" through readability and simplicity.

How do you decide on the grade based on the actual data? Do you have some general limits (grade boundaries to continue the teacher metaphor!) , or do you consider the actual data in some kind of context?

Andy

29mattdamon 03 Aug 2010 , 6:51pm

FTSE 350 highest dividend stocks top 50:

http://www.FTSEdividend.com

XMFPhila100 09 Aug 2010 , 8:29pm

Hi wordofandy,

I apologize for the delayed response -- I was on vacation last week.

Free cash flow metrics carry a total 50% weight in the final grade for a reason. I want to see a company able to generate more than enough real cash to fund its dividend. Earnings are accruals-based figures, meaning they're based on an accountant's opinion and not necessarily backed by cold-hard cash.

Earnings are still important, however, so they get a 20% weight in the final grade. The last 30% is made up of history (10%), debt coverage (10%), and sustainable growth rate (10%).

Does that help?

Foolish best,

Todd Wenning

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.