Dividend Report Card: Diageo

Published in Company Comment on 20 July 2010

Does the drinks giant's dividend pass the grade?

All dividends are not created equal.

We learned this lesson the hard way in recent years. In 2009 alone, 202 UK companies cut their dividend, whilst another 60 froze their payouts. Because dividends are at the board of directors' discretion, when times get tough a firm's dividend payout can meet the corporate chopping block.

Avoiding the executioner

Certainly things have gotten better since those dark days, but with many concerns remaining about the global economy, investors would be wise to ask the following three questions of their companies' dividends:

1. Over time, has this company steadily increased its payouts?

2. How sustainable is the dividend?

3. Does the company have room to further increase the dividend?

To help you out, I've created a proprietary dividend report card that seeks to answer these questions by analyzing a company's financial statements. It's not intended to be a Magic Eight-Ball, but it will hopefully get you pointed in the right direction.

Today's pupil is Diageo (LSE: DGE).

Dividend history

Income-minded investors prefer a good track record of rising dividend payouts. Not only is it a sign that management is dedicated to returning shareholder value, but also that the board of directors expects future profitability.

Let's see how well Diageo has increased its dividend over the past five years, relative to its earnings growth:

Metric5-Year
Annualized
Growth Rate
Dividend per share5.4%
Diluted earnings per share4.5%

Data provided by Capital IQ, as of 20 July, 2010.

It's good to see that Diageo has grown its dividend at a rate comparable to earnings growth, but that growth has been rather lacklustre in the past five years. A 5% growth rate is better than zero, but ideally, you'd like to see that rate in the higher single digits.

Past returns don't guarantee future results, however, so dividend history is only 10% of the final grade. That said, for this category, Diageo scores a 3 of 5.

Sustainability

Finding companies with solid financial footing, backed by a strong balance sheet, sufficient profitability, and plenty of free cash flow is at the root of successful dividend investing. There's no point buying a share yielding 5% if you don't believe the dividend is sustainable. For this reason, sustainability gets a 50% weighting in my formula.

To analyse dividend sustainability, I look at three factors:

1. Interest coverage ratio (operating profits / interest costs)

2. Earnings dividend payout ratio (dividend per share / earnings per share).

3. Free cash flow dividend payout ratio (Dividends paid / Free cash flow to equity).

It's worth noting that in my definition of free cash flow to equity, I also back out any acquisitions the company's made over the past 12 months. Hey, that's cash that could have been paid out as a dividend! Plus, serial acquirers may cut a dividend to help fund a new acquisition, so we want to be sure there's still plenty of cash to go around after all investments have been made.

For Diageo, the results are:

MetricTrailing
12 Months
Final Grade
Weighting
Report Card
Score
(out of 5)
Interest coverage3.510%4
EPS payout ratio59.4%10%4
FCFE payout ratio47.3%30%5

Data provided by Capital IQ, as of 20 July, 2010.

Diageo generates more than enough profits and free cash flow to cover its dividend, which is an encouraging sign of sustainability. The interest coverage ratio is a little lower than I'd prefer, but it appears Diageo has no problem paying its creditors.

Growth

Once you know that a dividend is sustainable, you'll want to see how much room the company has to raise its payout. It may not be quite as important as dividend sustainability, but it's still an essential factor for income-minded investors who want their payouts to increase at rates well above inflation.

For this reason, growth makes up the last 40% of the final grade.

In this section, I once again use the earnings and free cash flow payout ratios. Only this time I'm not just looking to see if there's more than enough profits and cash to sustain the dividend. I want to see how much the payout can grow, so the lower the payout ratios, the better.

I also consider a firm's implied sustainable growth rate, defined as return on equity times its retention ratio (the percentage of profits it keeps to reinvest in the business). This is the highest achievable growth rate the company can have without changing its capital structure.

Here's how Diageo scored on these metrics:

MetricTrailing
12 Months
Final Grade
Weighting
Report Card
Score
(out of 5)
EPS payout ratio59.4%10%3
FCFE payout ratio47.3%20%4
Sustainable growth rate16.1%10%5

Diageo certainly has the ability to grow its dividend at a steady clip in the coming years. It currently produces roughly £2 in free cash flow for every £1 it pays out as a dividend, so there is room to pay more. Historically, the company's raised its dividend between 5-7% over rolling five year periods and I see no reason why that can't continue.

Bonus factor

An "ungraded" section of the dividend report card is to see how a stock's current yield stacks up against direct competitors'. If it's too high relative to competitors' yields, the board could be tempted to slow the growth rate, or vice versa, to bring it more in line with the industry average.

Company

Dividend
Yield

SABMiller (LSE: SAB)2.3%
Brown-Forman2.0%
Pernod-Ricard S.A.1.9%

With most of the major brewers/distillers shares paying rather low yields, Diageo's 3.3% yield is relatively high. This lack of "competition" may explain why Diageo, as one of the highest yielding brewers/distillers, has not increased its payout at a faster rate.

Pencils down!

With all the numbers in, here's how Diageo's dividend scored:

WeightingCategoryFinal Grade
10%History3
10%Balance sheet4
10%Income statement4
30%Free cash flow5
10%Income statement3
20%Cash flow4
10%Sustainable growth5
100%Total Score (out of 5)4.2
 Final GradeB+

Diageo's dividend may not be on high yield investors' radars, but it should be considered for a well-diversified, dividend-focused portfolio due to its strong sustainability and steady growth potential.

More from Todd Wenning:

Coming soon: The Motley Fool will be launching a brand new service focussed on dividend investing. Register your interest and you'll be the first to find out the full details.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

mcturra2000 21 Jul 2010 , 11:22am

DGE has an interest cover over 3, which looks safe for now.

What I don't like is its balance sheet. Looking at the results at Feb 2010, we see long term liabilities of £10.5b. Equity amounts to £3.8b. It's using way way too much financial leverage IMO. I think Graham advocated a leverage of at most 100% (I'm not sure if that was for a utility, though. Non-utilities would be much lower).

Its ROCE is less than its ROE - a warning sign that its borrowings are actually destroying shareholder wealth.


If interest rates move upwards then it may find itself needing to sell assets, probably at unfavourable prices. I'm not saying interest rates will rise - but it should be noted that rates are at around historical lows.

I'm not saying that such a doomsday scenario will play out - still, I think people ignore the balance sheet until it's too late.
I think you need to justify why you give the balance sheet a "4". I would have given it a "0".

XMFPhila100 21 Jul 2010 , 4:13pm

Hi mcturra2000,

"I think you need to justify why you give the balance sheet a "4". I would have given it a "0"."

An interest coverage ratio (EBIT / interest expense) of 3.5x isn't bad in itself. In fact, a coverage ratio between 3-4.2.5x is typical of firms rated "A-" by S&P, precisely where DGE's credit is rated today. By that measure, the balance sheet is certainly not a zero.

What's more concerning, as you note is the erosion of the coverage ratio from 8.5x in 2006 to 3.5x today. The primary driver of this has been the dramatic increase in debt over the same period, which it primarily used to make acquisitions.

This low interest-rate environment hasn't been a terrible time to issue debt, however, as it can lower the firm's cost of capital. In fact, I'll make the argument that Diageo was probably under-leveraged for a long time.

Consider the average debt to capital ratio for brewers/distillers is 58.2% and the debt:EBITDA average is 5.3x. Diageo currently stands at 66.4% and 3.2x, respectively -- not out of the ordinary. In 2006, Diageo stood at 50.5% and 2.1x, so it had some room to lever up.

Brewers/distillers are able to carry this much debt because their sales are fairly consistent. Diageo's currently in a pinch because its premium brands are suffering in recession-hit developed markets. Most of its debt isn't coming due until 2013-2014, so that'll give it time to get its newer acquisitions online and for the economic picture to improve a bit.

Obviously if you don't think the economy's going to recover and the consumer will remain constrained for years to come, Diageo might not be the pick for you.

In sum, I think "4" is a fair score for Diageo's balance sheet, but investors should still keep an eye on it in the coming quarters.

Foolish best,

Todd Wenning



guykguard 21 Jul 2010 , 5:26pm

Todd: I agree, with the possible exception that your B+ grade seems a little mean!
Quite why mcturra2000 comes all over wobbly about Diageo's LTD is a mystery. I think he misunderstands Ben Graham: he's not alone.

For the year 2009, Diageo's after-tax net interest expense was a miserable £441mn, or about 18% of EBIT. This is peanuts, even if rates were to rise gently next year. And the tax shield on the interest expense was a feeble (1-.15).
From my 25 years experience in manufacturing industry the ruleof thumb ratio for LTD:Equity was 2:1. Leverage, or trading on the equity as we used to call it here, affords shareholders big gains in favourable trading conditions.
Where's Diageo's problem, please?

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.