American Classics For Your Portfolio

Published in Company Comment on 3 March 2010

High quality US shares deserve a closer look.

Like the UK, the US markets had its own "lost decade" in the Noughties, with the S&P 500 index producing a negative ten-year return for the first time since tracking began in 1927. So could US blue chips be the answer for global investors this coming decade?

As it turns out, maybe so.

In his third-quarter letter, and again in his fourth-quarter letter to investors, GMO Capital's Jeremy Grantham made a case for quality US stocks. In fact, in the more recent letter, he predicts that over the next seven years, "US high quality" stocks will post 6.8% annualised real returns -- two full percentage points over emerging markets.

How is this possible?

One thing favouring S&P 500 firms is they collectively hold $2,180 billion (£1,450 billion) in cash, the highest level in at least nine years. Granted, at least some this cash is to hedge against another economic downturn, but it also puts a number of large American firms in a position to make strategic acquisitions and fund expansion opportunities. 

For example, Apple is sitting on a massive $25 billion (£16 billion) cash pile, which CEO Steve Jobs recently told investors he plans to use for opportunistic investments down the road.

The second advantage for American blue chips is that many of them do significant business overseas. While the median S&P firm derives just 25% of its sales overseas, a recent study by Goldman Sachs found the 50 companies with the highest levels of foreign sales outperformed the market nearly two-to-one in 2009. 

The shares in this basket include Pfizer, Coca-Cola, and Merck, and as a group generate a median 68% of their sales abroad. If the US dollar weakens further and emerging markets continue to grow rapidly, strong performance from these multinationals will likely continue.

Most importantly, valuations of select US blue chips remain attractive, despite the rally over the past year. To illustrate, Ned Davis Research found that over the past thirty years, the S&P 500's average price-to-book value was 2.41; today it sits at 2.14 (11% lower). 

The index average dividend yield of 1.9% may be less than desired, but it's also coming off the worst two year stretch for dividend cuts in generations. The good news is US companies are raising their payouts once again -- Standard & Poors expects 5% dividend growth in 2010 and estimates it will return to pre-crash levels by 2012 or 2013.

Let's name some names

All three of these factors make US blue chips in general worth a closer look, but I want to single out a number of shares that would likely pass Grantham's "high quality" test.

My criteria are:

1. S&P 500 shares only, with

2. Dividend yields over 2%,

3. Return on equity over 15%

4. Long term debt-to-equity ratio below 50%, and

5. At least 50% of sales outside the US.

Here are three of the results:

CompanyDividend
yield
Return
on equity
Long term
debt-to-equity
ratio
Non-US
sales
Procter & Gamble2.8%17.6%33%60%
Coca-Cola3.3%30.1%20%73%
3M2.6%28.2%41%63%

*All in U.S. dollar terms. Data provided by Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poors, as of 2 March 2010.

These are all fine companies with solid balance sheets, globally recognised brands, and long histories of increasing dividend payouts. In short, they're worth your time to research.

What this means for UK Fools

It's important to remember that you don't need to invest in emerging market companies to benefit from growth in those economies -- many multinational firms, like Diageo (LSE: DGE), Unilever (LSE: ULVR), and British American Tobacco (LSE: BATS) in the UK and the US firms mentioned above can add to your portfolio's international diversity and provide ample appreciation potential.

With a number of American multinationals poised for consistent growth over the next seven years and beyond, don't be quick to dismiss US shares. While the past decade was surely a bust, the future is indeed looking brighter.

More on the markets:

US Fool analyst Todd Wenning owns shares of Procter & Gamble, but of no other company mentioned.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Basia02 04 Mar 2010 , 5:22pm

Sterling hits a 10 month low. The Euro falls again because of Greece, and here we are talking of a decling dollar. What are all these currencies falling against?
The US is ahead in the recovery curve, and this must be the argument for investing in US stocks. However, if you buy now and the dollar does weaken you risk having your stock gains wiped out by the currency loss. I would buy the UK and emerging countries

XMFPhila100 04 Mar 2010 , 5:58pm

Hi Basia02,

All good points, and I should have addressed them in my article. Currency markets can be quite unpredictable in the short-run, as we're seeing with Sterling's response to the potential of a hung parliament. If you're concerned at all about further weakening in the Sterling, it might be best to wait until after the elections to make a move into any overseas market.

Foolish best,

Todd Wenning

TheBoulevardier 17 Mar 2010 , 1:32pm

Hi Todd,

For companies like these I discount EPS against a standard 6.5%. This gives me a quick (and conservative) number to compare against market price (rather than a full DCF). By this measure both KO and MMM are trading at a premium (+16%) and only PG is on a level with my current favourites WMT (Wal-mart) and COP (ConocoPhillips). So although KO is a superb company to own, at what level would you say that it is overpriced?

Many thanks, Tamesis Child.

XMFPhila100 17 Mar 2010 , 2:59pm

Hi Tamesis Child,

Careful with the EPS valuation method as earnings are simply an accountant's opinion and can be full of things like one-time charges and non-GAAP figures. The EPS method can be a quick and easy, but measuring free cash is much "cleaner."

For some perspective on KO, one of our newsletters here in the US has their fair value pegged around $60.

Foolish best,

Todd Wenning
US Fool

TheBoulevardier 17 Mar 2010 , 4:14pm

Hi Todd,

I try to construct my own EPS figure from the accounts if I'm particularly interested in a company (and may even factor in Book Value) but I'll definitely bear your comments in mind.

I'm still experimenting with valuation methods using 'mental arithmetic' only, so errors are likely at the moment although the primary errors are going to be from under-valuing prospective purchases.

Cheers, Richard.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.