8.3% Yield Anyone?

Published in Company Comment on 3 February 2010

A property firm with an 8%+ yield and a big discount to asset value.

Companies specialising in public service properties fell completely out of favour when the credit crunch really began to crunch share prices in pretty much anything related to property. All of a sudden, the one way ride wasn't quite what it seemed and the reverse gear was swiftly engaged.

As usual with such situations, the prices swung too much in either direction and the seismic waves certainly haven't settled yet. This presents opportunities for canny investors. And Public Service Properties Investments (LSE: PSPI) just might still be an opportunity.

Does what it says on the tin

The company does largely what it says on the tin, providing 39 care homes mainly in the UK, with an increasing presence in Germany where it owns 14, with another in Switzerland, and 140 post offices in the USA. 

It takes the rents but doesn't operate the care homes, so whilst there is no direct trading risk, it is important that the operators are reputable and able to continue paying rents. The UK homes are operated by privately-owned European Care Group.

The company first floated on AIM around the height of the bubble in March 2007 at 150p, raising £30m with a market capitalisation of £100m.

As you might expect, the shares plummeted following flotation, reaching their nadir at 35.5p in March this year -- when their inherent value was pointed out by Steve Scott with perfect timing. The rally that followed saw the shares go over 80p in October. Today, they stand at 72p, valuing the group at just over £48m.

What you get for your cash

In return for a purchase today, investors are buying into a company with adjusted net asset per share of 193p at the last count  and a relatively whopping yield of over 8.3%. These factors combined are the share's main appeal, though life isn't that simple unfortunately. Gearing, of course, is crucial to the investment case and the company's ability to maintain the 6p per annum dividend.

The ins and outs of the company were discussed recently in some depth on the Fool's discussion boards. At the interim stage, the Loan to Value ratio was 54%. This doesn't look overly demanding if we've seen the bottom of the commercial property market.

Meanwhile, the number of people needing nursing home care in the UK over the next couple of decades will rise significantly both in the UK and Germany, unless someone comes up with an elixir of eternal youth pretty quickly.

Sustainable business?

All of the group's UK leases are linked to the retail price index, subject to a minimum annual increase of 1.5%, with a cap at 5%. 

Most leases are for 35 years, and there is a good spread across the country with a mix of nursing, residential and specialist care homes. 

Meanwhile, the rents for the German portfolio increase every three or four years by a proportion of the increase in the German consumer price index. 

The Swiss investment property increases annually in line with the Swiss consumer price index whilst the US investment portfolio maintains the same rental level throughout the term of the lease.

This suggests to me that the business model is sustainable as is, therefore, the yield. And that's where the main interest lies for potential investors today looking for a reasonably safe high yield -- unless the discount to NAV is going to narrow.

The house broker agrees with earnings per share of 9.7p in for 2009, rising to 10.2p for 2010, so either things aren't half as solid as they seem -- or the shares are a high-yielding bargain.

More share ideas from David Holding:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

WealthyInvestor 03 Feb 2010 , 1:46pm

Your title to this article needs a couple of words adding along the lines of '8.3% Yield For One Year Only!'. This company is not quite the income generator your article may be suggesting. Pre-tax priofts have been falling, quite dramatically, for three years in a row, and were actually negative in the most recent set of accounts as far as I can tell. Would you invest in a company that is good at losing money? Dividend cover is around the 1.2 mark, hardly a large margin of safety to protect that dividend you are shouting about, and of course you also rightly point out that this business is servicing a lot of debt. Add all of that up, and I would be surprised if this business can maintain its current dividend policy beyond one year. However the share price may indeed offer some upside potential due the supply and demand issues in this sector that you allude to, but I would suggest that potential investors look widely and consider the likes of Vodafone, National Grid and Thorntons long before they look for income from this one.

kenny50 03 Feb 2010 , 6:26pm

Pre-tax profits have only fallen because property gains have gradually evaporated. However, net rental income has been rising and it is that which finances the dividends - not property gains. You need to examine PSPI in more than a superficial manner because all losses relate to NAV falls. As the lasy valuation showed NAV was 153p, before adjustment, the current share price of 73p presents a potential bargain - even if property values show zero growth in the next two years or more.

The dividends represent about two-thirds of net income so are likely to be capable of being maintaned through thick and thin - as they have been since the company floated in March 2007. They may even be capable of being increased but I am not counting on this.

It is my conclusion that even if the company is unable to expand becuase of lack of available loan finance, the solid dividend yield makes this a excellent long term investment. I agree that if you are looking for a company whose share price is going to shoot for the stars, PSPI is not likely to be an appropriate investment but frankly, I am happy for the shares price to remain at this level so I can accumulate more shares over time.

TonyBritten 04 Feb 2010 , 3:29pm

I see Wealthy Invester as an investor and kenny50 as one who likes a gamble. However my take on this company is looked at in the eyes of the Lending Banker (retired).
For a company to operate properly it needs money in the till and to configure this we take Current Liabilities from Current Assets. I note that in the year 31.12.08 that we had a figure of Net Current Assets £27.21m, BUT in the last accounts 31.12.09 it was adverse with Net Current Liabilities £1.70m . . . . I don't like this.
Again a positive Cash Flow in 2008 was £25.45m BUT in 2009 it stood adverse at £19.68m.
There are also other worrying signs in these last accounts.
The bulk of the Non current Assets are all in Investment Properties at £258.45m and how can you really judge that figure. How do you know they are really worth that?? as they mislead you on the NAV.
I see that the company reason if they have a generous dividend @ 8.4% now that will be to attract the Shareholders to stump up more cash for a Rights Issue now on the drawing board.
Buns look good in the Bakers window, it's what they taste like at home that matters.
I won't be joining the herd.

kenny50 04 Feb 2010 , 4:54pm

If you look at the results to 30.06.09 you will see that net current assets have moved back to positive following the obtaining of a new loan.
In relation to Cash Flow the reason it was £19.68m negative in 2008 (not 2009) was because they purchased £40m of property in that year of which about £16m was financed from the cash left over from that raised when the company floated. If, for a property investment company you regard cash outflow as including the purchase of income producing assets, it is little wonder our banking system is in such a mess.
The company is using its Surplus cash flow for a combination of investment in its current portfolio and payment of dividends – not least because it is generating a surplus of cash flow.
If you choose not to buy the Buns in the Baker's window you will never know what they taste like, however, it might be beneficial to first ensure you know enough to distinguish the stale buns from those that are fresh.

RedundantHippie 04 Feb 2010 , 8:45pm

Another one is Primary Health Care Properties (PHP.L) - They own those nice Health Centres and GP Surgeries that are springing up all over the place - and the Dividend looks sustainable!

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.