Apple's iPad: iWinner or iFlop?

Published in Company Comment on 28 January 2010

Boiling it down, the iPad is simply a giant iPhone.

After years of heated speculation, Apple's newest wunderproduct was announced yesterday. Yes, we'd all grown tired of rampant tech-gossip, so in case you've tuned out, I'm proud to report that the product did not contain any of the following "rumoured features":

  • A flexible OLED screen.

  • A screensaver of Steve Jobs ... in nothing but a turtleneck.

  • An application that can make you piping hot toasts every morning.

  • The name "Newton Version 2.0".

  • A holster for your iPhone.

  • An iPurse to go with the iPad: The iMan-Purse.

  • A pony.

While I am disappointed by the lack of a pony, the iPad does come with a number of other features:

  • A large, 9.7" screen, tuned specially for a rich Web-browsing experience and watching HD videos.

  • 10 hours' of battery time for those long-haul flights, endless train journeys to work, and general couch browsing.

  • A homebrewed chip that clocks in at 1 GHz and contains between 16 and 64 gigs of flash storage, depending on the model.

  • Support for the App Store, which should give game developers a more powerful platform to develop on. The iPad also has instant compatibility with existing iPhone and iTouch apps.

  • An iBooks storefront aimed directly at Amazon's e-reader device, the Kindle.

  • Support for business productivity program iWork.

  • In the US, the option of a $30-per-month unlimited data plan from AT&T.

  • A much lower price than expected: $499-$829 depending on the model.

To boil the iPad down into a single sentence: It's an enormous iPhone.

Taking a step back

Before we crown the iPad as Apple's next iPhone-level winner, it's worth taking a step back and analysing what hurdles remain. Here are some factors that have held up previous attempts at bringing tablets mainstream:

  • The Consumer Electronics Association predicts flat growth in laptops for 2010. Granted, the iPad isn't exactly a laptop, but the overall "spending pie" on high-priced electronics isn't going to grow much. As such, the iPad may need to act as a replacement for laptops and other full-functioning computers, rather than as an incremental electronics purchase for consumers, if it wants to hit more aggressive sales targets.

  • The iPad still needs to carve out an elusive "tablet niche." Microsoft's Bill Gates famously claimed in 2001 that tablet computers would be the No. 1 selling kind of PCs within five years. Granted, Apple has gone out of its way to create a superior user interface for the iPad, but that didn't stop Steve Jobs from reportedly asking questions during the tablet's development, like: "What [are tablets] good for besides surfing the Web in the bathroom?"

iFad?

And that's really the main question surrounding the iPad boils down to: What's the demand for this type of electronics form factor? The iPad sits in a niche that's too large to function as a truly mobile device like the iPhone, Blackberry and Nokia E90, but it lacks the full functionality and built-in physical keyboard that users still demand for more intensive computing needs.

It's not that I don't see the iPad being adopted by hoards of early adopters and selling like hot cakes initially. Amazon proved with its Kindle that many users will pay up for "tweener" devices that are often an incremental purchase after a laptop and smartphone.

Also, the base $499 price point is impressive and should help sway buyers from the red-hot netbook segment over to the iPad's corner. However, I do think the hype got ahead of the addressable market for the iPad. It'll be a nice product, but there's not as much demand as there was for iPod and iPhone-type products.

Does it need to be a megahit?

No ...

Now, before any Apple fans jump down my throat, I actually think this is fine. Why? Apple doesn't need the iPad to be an iPhone-like success to sustain its current share. If the product's more of a hit than I give it credit for, think of it as some nice icing on the iEmpire's cake.

Feel free to share your thoughts on Apple's iPad in the comments area below!

More on the economy and the markets:

> If you're in the market for buying shares, consider opening an online broker account with The Motley Fool's Share Dealing Service. You can buy and sell shares in real time for a flat rate of just £10. Click here to find out how you can open an account for free today. There is no obligation to trade.

> A version of this article, written by Eric Bleeker, was originally published on Fool.com. It has been updated by Bruce Jackson.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

lotontech 28 Jan 2010 , 9:45am

I would buy one if it supported multitasking and Adobe Flash, which it doesn't :-(

I typically have several windows open simultaneously so that I can spread bet (on more than one account), log in to my regular stockbroker, read the Fool, view charts, update my trading blog, and check how my books are selling -- all at the same time! And on the Flash front, the majority of spread betting platforms are Flash-based.

It looks pretty, though :-)

TMFTigger 28 Jan 2010 , 10:13am

You obviously need to buy several iPads lotontech. Maybe that's Apple's crafty business plan. :-)

TMFFlaneur 28 Jan 2010 , 10:56am

iPad is many things, but underestimate amongst them I think is that it's basically a replacement for their iPod market segment, which is dying off as people migrate to iPhone.

BarrenFluffit 28 Jan 2010 , 11:17am

Screen sizes / battery life seem to be the key issues now. Mapping works much better on a bigger screen for instance.

prak1957 28 Jan 2010 , 2:02pm

I've been playing with my son's iTouch but can't see the screen. This old man needs a "large print" version.
So .. Finally!

prak1957 28 Jan 2010 , 2:04pm

Oh.. and that's if my hands don't shhhhhake!

prashton 28 Jan 2010 , 2:40pm

I believe the many techie negative comments are largely unfounded. The iPad is not for techies at all, but for more passive users who don't need the hassle of owning a typical PC and all that that entails. Think education, communications and simple leisure activities.

ralos 28 Jan 2010 , 2:55pm

If it reads like a Kindle or Sony E-book as well as doing all the other things then I think it could be mega. I didn't think the price would be so competitive. It will dominate and could be another i-phone. I wish I'd bought some Apple shares a while back.

simondigital57 28 Jan 2010 , 4:02pm

Apple have never been a big fan of Flash, I read somewhere that Steve Jobs the CEO of Apple really hated it.The idea is to close the gap between smart phones and notebooks this where the iPad comes in as experts have stated and not to replace the laptop and Apple are not the stupid. Apple are trying to do what they did with iTunes and it look if Apple are trying to change our reading/internet culture. I think you can petty do more on a laptop than an iPad.

hroodgar 28 Jan 2010 , 11:17pm

I may wait until the next version of i-pad, which i hope will be half the size, larger than the i-phone but small enough to put in my jacket pocket like a paperback book.

iipad 14 Feb 2010 , 1:45am

I think an iPurse will and should be the priority of apple. There is a huge margin on accessories and why not have accessories with beautiful design and colors.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.