How To Diversify Away From The UK

Published in Company Comment on 28 September 2009

The fortunes of the world's biggest miner are not tied to the UK economy.

It is often said that a mine is a hole in the ground with a liar on top. History has proven this all too often, at least when it comes to small mining companies, due to the tendency of some promoters to paint an over-optimistic picture of what lies underground.

Many people swear by small mining companies (and many swear at them) because they offer the prospect of huge rewards (less is said about the risk of massive losses). An infamous boom in mining shares occurred in 1969 as the shares of the Australian nickel-miner Poseidon which rose from just under one dollar to over A$280, dragging many other producers' shares to ridiculous heights, before falling back to below one dollar when the nickel price crashed and Poseidon's ore reserves turned out to be of a far lower grade than first thought.

A strong argument in favour of mining companies is that as the world emerges from the global recession the demand for industrial metals will significantly increase. Underpinning this increase in demand is that as China and India are continuing to industrialise and improve their infrastructure so they will continue to need more metals.

Mining companies offer investors an interesting way of obtaining exposure to these economies and the global economy as it emerges from recession. For those of us who don't want to deal with the 'excitement' that the small miners offer we have the multinational giants, which occupy the same niche as the supermajor oil companies such as BP (LSE: BP) hold in the oil business.

A Giant Amongst Giants

Unlike the smaller miners, many of whom are yet to produce any minerals (and in some cases it is debatable whether they have any commercial reserves), multinational miners such as BHP Billiton (LSE: BLT) have large proven reserves of metallic ore and are already engaged in large-scale production.

BHP was formed back in 2001 from the merger of Australia's Broken Hill Proprietary, and the Dutch-South African firm Billiton. BHP is the largest mining company in the world with significant interests in most industrial metals, coal, gold and diamonds. BHP also has a large oil exploration and production business which is amongst the top 30 oil & gas producers in the world.

Mining is a business where there are tremendous economies of scale, which as economists will tell you ultimately results in market share being concentrated between several extremely large firms. BHP's main competitors are Anglo American (LSE: AAL), Rio Tinto (LSE: RIO), the Anglo-Swiss Xstrata (LSE: XTA), the second largest mining company in the world, Brazil's Vale and numerous smaller companies in individual metals such as the Anglo-Chilean copper miner and railway operator, Antofagasta (LSE: ANTO) and the largest gold miner in the world, Canada's Barrick Gold.

Diversify Away From Britain

The performance of the British economy is largely irrelevant to BHP, since Britain is a fairly small consumer of metals, so if you think that the British domestic economy is in for a rough few years the global nature of BHP's business represents one way to diversify away from Britain.

Investors in BHP are however affected by exchange rates because BHP declares its dividends in US dollars but pays British investors in sterling.

BHP's size means that there is no chance that its shares are going to double overnight due to a major discovery. However, investors should note that the Chinese government has been trying to secure future supplies of metals as was seen recently when Chinalco tried and failed to buy an 18% stake in Rio Tinto. The Chinese have not gone away …

Show Me The Money

BHP's earnings per share (eps) in 2009 were 105.4 cents, down from 274.8 cents in 2008, which reflects the dramatic fall in the global demand for industrial metals last year. Significantly BHP increased its dividend by 17% to 82 cents, indicating the directors' confidence in the near future.

At an exchange rate of $1.61 per £1, BHP's shares are on a price-earnings ratio of 25.8, yielding 3%. Whilst BHP's P/E ratio seems high when compared to that of the FTSE 100, it is normal for cyclical companies such as miners to have high PE ratios when the global economy is in a recession.

To give you some idea of how well BHP's businesses have performed in recent years, the 2003 eps was only 30.9c with a 14.5c dividend, thus over the last six years BHP's shareholders have seen a 241% increase in eps and a 465% increase in the dividend.

BHP, unlike many other companies, doesn't have any major problems with its debts or its pension scheme. Looking at the balance sheet, BHP's total liabilities are just over $38 billion, its assets are almost $79 billion! In contrast BHP's pension scheme deficit is a mere $376 million which in the context of these amounts is almost a rounding error!

To sum up, BHP offers investors an interesting way to diversify away from the UK economy whilst also benefiting from the global recovery.

P.S. If when you saw BHP's epic code, BLT, it reminded you of a sandwich, you're in good company as a few months ago I mistakenly ordered a BHP Billiton sandwich, getting some funny looks in the process!

More from Tony Luckett:

> Tony owns shares in BHP Billiton and BP.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

davidshillsenior 28 Sep 2009 , 11:17am

Mining is just one of the ills that the UK economy suffers from and where our strengths are not in this sector due to size. For size says everything in many respects.

Although we all wish that the UK economy can redeem itself, it is with regret that the long-term outlook, no matter who is in government, is bleak. Whilst the present government has conducted the economy into the present economic crisis, as it was under their watch, they have never invested in any meaningful way in the commodity that all successful economies are built upon – Innovation and its exploitation. Indeed, as they are fighting a rear-guard action now where hundreds of billions have already been committed of the people’s wealth and pumping more of it in every day, no thought in the present strategy is for the future of British jobs and industry.
When Labour came to power many world-leading scientists and engineers advised them within two ‘white papers’ that Britain should build on its great strengths – creativity and innovative thinking that has revolutionised the world in the past and where according to the Japanese (1980s) and the Germans (1990s), we as a people have through this incredible thinking, created up to 55% of the technologies that have made the modern world what it is today. But for anyone watching ‘Newsnight’ yesterday evening (15.09.09) in an extended programme fully committed to the economy, one was left with a feeling of deep worry and impotence to do anything about our plight as a nation. Indeed, when Jeremy Paxman asked all the ‘movers and shakers’ on the programme what would get us out of this very deep hole, none of them could give him either an answer of a spark of light where the recovery could start. No one even mentioned the word innovation and where all that were on the programme appeared to be living in a frozen time-zone, unable to give any direction or strategic advice whatsoever.
This is where we go so wrong, as Paxman should have had people on the programme also who understand the dynamics of innovation and where this is the only solution to our long-term and immense problems. For in this respect, many of the world’s eminent scientists told Tony Blair’s government in 1997/98 to build a massive science and technology city fully committed to developing new global technologies and where this would have provided Britain’s future. But what did Labour do, they completely ignored these world-leading minds and decided to put all their/our trust and money into the financial sector. But the sad fact is that these people on Newsnight did not even understand the meaning of the word innovation in a global context and where the word was never mentioned. Time is not too late to implement what these world leading experts said in the late 1990s, but will the government listen, I do not think so and where even more of the people’s wealth will be wasted and squandered on things that will impoverish this country even more in the years ahead.
A very sad story, but where I am afraid perfectly true when viewed against the present mindset of government and where it is simply frozen in the past, just like those on Newsnight were yesterday. Why don’t people wake up is the big question to revolutionary ideas ?

Dr David Hill
World Innovation Foundation
Bern, Switzerland

bimber 28 Sep 2009 , 7:28pm

Well said, Dr Hill. Labour were sold the idea that the city created wealth instead of sucking up the wealth everyone else created. We need a way of getting capital to innovators, we do not need a bunch of self-serving parasites using money created from nothing to place bets on the continuation of a bubble, with the involuntary backing of the taxpayer in case their gamble goes wrong.

rant over.



Miners let us diversify away from the UK but we might also want to diversify away from China next year.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/business/story/0,28124,26060407-36418,00.html

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.