The Risks With AIM Shares

Published in Company Comment on 31 July 2009

Don't underestimate the risks involved in investing in AIM stocks.

So far 2009 appears to have been a good year for AIM, the market for smaller companies run by the London Stock Exchange (LSE). The main AIM index has risen by roughly a third this year.

However, if you look a little closer at some of the statistics, the picture appears to be more mixed, giving a clearer indication of the risks you run when investing in this market in particular.

Delistings

Many companies on AIM have been badly hit by the credit crunch as research from Trowers & Hamlins, a City law firm, and UHY Hacker Younger, an accountancy group, has revealed. They reckon the number of AIM companies that have delisted because of financial stress or insolvency jumped from 12 in the first quarter of this year to 34 in the second.

In the first half of this year, the LSE's own figures reveal that there have been 150 delistings, only 5 of which were because the company stepped up to the main market.

These statistics reinforce the fact that you really do need to do your own research when investing in an AIM share. From personal experience, I'd say you stand a pretty good chance of losing most of your money if one of your investments delists, as you won't be able to sell a tiny stake in an illiquid company to anyone -- or you'll be offered a pittance to part with your shares.

The risks

Many AIM companies are risky plays for the following reasons:

  • they're often smaller companies without proven track records;
  • they're often based overseas, so it's harder to get good information on how they're doing;
  • they rely on just one person, project or product;
  • the spread (the difference between the price you buy and sell at) is often quite wide;
  • shareholder influence can sometimes be limited because the majority of the shares may be closely held by company directors; and
  • publicly available information may be less comprehensive than that provided by listed companies.

Compared to larger companies on the main market, there is certainly a greatly increased risk that you could lose some or all of the capital you invest.

Warning signs

So how can avoid the worst that AIM has to offer? 

It's not easy but there are a number of classic warning signs to watch out for such as:

  • being slow to update the market on price sensitive information or even late filing of accounts;
  • vague announcements lacking in operational and financial detail;
  • regularly raising new funds and diluting existing shareholders;
  • a large number of options or warrants in issue;
  • directors with a track record of disappointing investors;
  • loss making start-ups whose management is being paid excessive amounts; and
  • lack of corporate governance procedures.

I'm also inherently suspicious of 'buy' notes put out by a company's house broker, especially if it's the only analyst covering the share. I've let these influence some of my buying decisions in the past and usually come to regret it. They have a vested interest in making the company look attractive so treat everything you read with added caution, especially when it comes to the firm's future prospects.

Gossip on bulletin boards and AGMs can be a useful source of information too, although you need to verify what you hear and make your own mind up wherever possible.

The rewards

Of course, what makes it all worthwhile are the potential rewards. Some AIM shares have done exceedingly well and graduated to the main market. Examples that spring to mind are: Mears (LSE: MER), Lancashire Holdings (LSE: LER), Domino's Pizza (LSE: DOM) and Vectura (LSE: VEC).

I've bagged some good profits from a few of the AIM stocks that I've invested in. Indeed, I hope to revisit past successes but I minded to pass much of the pap that is touted on AIM.

More on AIM shares:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Terrapin1 31 Jul 2009 , 9:22am

After seeing C4's documentary about Mugabe being funded by a certain AIM listed British company I suspect there are great many dodgey dealers who want the cash without scrutiny

wolliwoo 31 Jul 2009 , 12:18pm

Also, of those 147 delistings, 8 were due to reverse takeovers, and one other transferred to PLUS. Furthermore, a significant number of other companies cancelled their AIM listing but retained their original overseas lsiting (ie Azure Dynamics, on the TSX), and there are other examples like GNE that were bought out! AIM's made out to be some wild and crazy frontier-town of a market but it's a quite successful nursery for growth companies - with such a model you have to accept there's going to be a lot of sieving through the 'pap' if you want to find a few gems, I think.

wolliwoo 31 Jul 2009 , 12:22pm

Growthcompany.co.uk, which Motley Fool advertises with, are specialists on the subject - here are some interesting recent pieces:

Income on AIM: http://www.growthcompany.co.uk/features/1055452/aims-income-set-to-flow.thtml

Miners on AIM:
http://www.growthcompany.co.uk/features/1051172/signs-of-life-below-ground.thtml

scotty500 03 Aug 2009 , 1:00pm

Do you think new initiatives such as PSQ analytics will help weed out some of the pap & give a more independent view of the company than the house broker \ paid research etc ?

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.