Where Next For House Prices?

Published in Company Comment on 9 July 2009

With three major house builders releasing updates, we look at the health of the housing market.

People are constantly looking out for the fabled green shoots that will herald a house price recovery. In the week that three house builders released updates, are we seeing any, or is the tumbleweed still blowing across the arid wastes of the property market?

Persimmon

First up, on Tuesday, was Persimmon (LSE: PSN), with a trading update ahead of interim results for the six months ending 30 June. Total sales came in at £625m (compared to £988m for the same period last year), which was ahead of earlier expectations, and sales in the second quarter have, apparently, picked up further and are currently running ahead of 2008 figures.

On top of that, Persimmon has brought its debt down from £906m in June last year to a credible £495m, giving a gearing figure of around 30%. It sounds like this improvement is going to carry on into the second half too, with forward sales standing at around £700m, up on the £650m figure this time last year (and well up on January's £458m).

Barratt

The second of the big builders to release news this week was Barratt Developments (LSE: BDEV), whose financial year ended on 30 June. Today's update tells us that completions are "in line with expectations". Like Persimmon, Barratt has got its debt down, though not quite to the same extent -- at £1.28b, it's about £370m down on June 2008.

Barratt's forward sales stand at around the £460m mark, which is still some way short of the June 2008 figure of £698m, so it seems to be lagging Persimmon in the recovery stakes.

Redrow

The last of the three to update us this week was Redrow (LSE: RDW), again with a full-year trading update released this morning. The picture was again similar, with the last six months having stabilised, though forward sales as of 30 June are slightly down on the 2008 figure.

Redrow's debt also appears to be under control -- standing at £215m in June, it was quite a bit down on December's £270m, and beat the company's target of £225m. Redrow has committed banking facilities of £425m, but its target for 2010 is to get the debt figure down further.

Redrow gave very little information on actual turnover or the value of forward sales, so it's hard to compare it with the other two, but it has warned that the major obstacle to a recovery is the chronic shortage of mortgages.

The bottom line?

What none of this week's statements has mentioned is profits, and that's due to the tried-and-tested reporting practice of keeping quiet about the bad stuff.

Analysts are expecting a £9m pre-tax loss from Persimmon for the full year to December 2009 (which amounts to a 3p per share loss), recovering to a profit in 2010 and positive earnings of almost 3p per share. Even that recovery would put today's 390p share price on a P/E of over 130, so it's going to take a couple of years yet to get back to reasonable profits.

Barratt's outlook is tougher. How this year's bottom line will compare with the expected loss per share of 28p is something we won't know until the full results are out, but there was nothing in today's release to suggest anything unexpected, and a similar sized loss is expected for next year too. It's not really surprising then, despite Barratt's larger turnover, its market value is a lot lower than Persimmon's.

Redrow has much smaller turnover than the other two, but is still penciled in for a 26p loss per share for this year and a 17p loss for 2010, again suggesting that Persimmon is performing the least badly of the three.

House prices?

But what about house prices? Persimmon tells us it has seen an underlying fall of 4% in the last six months, but that the rate of fall is slowing and prices are stabilising. Similarly, Barratt has seen average prices falling by 14% over the full year, with the biggest falls coming in Autumn 2008, and prices stabilising in recent months. Redrow also talks of prices stabilising.

I think it's still way too early to call the direction of house prices, myself. On the one hand, the builders are telling us that mortgages are still scarce, and the Halifax house price index has suggested a further 0.5% fall in June. But on the other hand, Nationwide has been painting a rosier picture and has started offering a 125% mortgage to existing customers who are in negative equity.

What to you think of the house price chart? Will it turn out to be U-shaped, W-shaped, or perhaps shaped like a cube but with the corners on the inside? Feel free to post your thoughts below or on our 'Property - Markets and Trends' discussion board.

More on the state of the economy:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

figurewizard 09 Jul 2009 , 2:10pm

The average house price is around £150,000 and the average income is £25,000, which is an affordability ratio of 7-1. Traditionally that ratio is 4-1. At present however it is lower interest rates that are slowing the fall in house prices towards this.

However interest rates are eventually going to rise. The money markets not politicians decide such matters and once there are credible signs of recovery in the US they will ensure that UK interest rates are forced up to head off both devaluation and inflation.

That's when the 4-1 affordability ratio will reassert itself. In the absence of significant growth in average UK earnings this means another 30% fall before prices hit the bottom.

davdug 09 Jul 2009 , 3:59pm

OK, so it's likely that these firms will be two years coming back into profit. With your affordability ratio off the chart at 7 - 1 and the fall in house prices being buffered by low interest rates the burning question is how long will 0.5% base rate remain?

supasap 09 Jul 2009 , 4:48pm

I think most of the forced sellers have sold now so it is a stand off between buyers and sellers again..... most of the would be sellers will refuse to sell at anything like current price less 15% let alone 30% ..... they simply won't and buyers won't buy thinking that a delay will result in price falls.... so it will be less activity and all the indices will be based on small volumes for a while then normal conditions will re-assert themselves ie modest rises based upon scarcity and demographics..... but for most of us it doesn't matter as a house is somewhere to live.... if it increases in value then kids need it to fund deposits if it falls in value then kids need smaller deposit

Furraboots 09 Jul 2009 , 9:02pm

Hate to tell you but 25000 into £150K is actually a 6-1 ratio.
You are not inspiring me withyour ananysis!

EndowmentVictim 10 Jul 2009 , 11:25am

I recently went onto one of those mortgage calculators - how much could I get?
I entered an income of £15,000, plus an £8,000 deposit - total £23,000. It told me I could get a MAXIMUM mortgage of £19,000, which would buy me - what? Half a garden shed? What happened to three times your income equals mortgage?
Interest rates are 0.5 per cent? Oh yeah? Loans are running at 8 to 9 per cent, (I have just been refused one by my bank of some 42 years) and credit cards: well, think of a number in the teens.
How do they expect to get the money-go-round going round again if we are denied credit or overcharged for it?
The stock market IS a reasonable place to put your money - not as risky as some would like you to believe, and it will recover.
Lastly, I have to echo the sentiments of some contributors - Motley is lovely, but putting out too much dross articles. Please reduce the quantity, and improve the quality. Many thanks.

supasap 10 Jul 2009 , 12:25pm

yes it is a good point on interest rates..... why don't the bank of England just lend to us customers direct at a reasonable mark up of say 1.5%..... why is there such a gap

mikeathome68 13 Jul 2009 , 10:25am


I've been following CityOdds (http://www.cityodds.com) and they present a consensus house price index for the various regions across the UK as at the May 2010 as measured by the Halifax House Price Index (released in June 2010).

Right now the consensus figures look a bit high (London Houses is about £240,000) and I think it will be nearer £220,000 in a years time so I made a prediction that House prices in London will be between £215,000 and £225,000 by June 2010. CityOdds showed a £100 bet will be worth £814 if I'm right. I made the bet and its still worth £92 if I want to sell it. I think I'll make money on this trade. House Prices just need to fall a bit for it to show a profit.

I'll keep the Fool board up to date with how I get on.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.