Britain's Vanishing Pubs

Published in Company Comment on 29 June 2009

The pub industry is struggling but there is one company still moving forward.

The greatest Briton of all time, Winston Churchill, once said to "always remember that I have taken more out of alcohol than alcohol has taken out of me". Two of the most recognisable symbols that define Britain are photographs of Churchill during the wartime years and the traditional British pub.

Today one of these great symbols is under attack as large numbers of pubs are closing all over the country in record numbers under the triple blow of the recession, dubious legislation and competition from supermarkets' off-licence sales.

One firm is still opening pubs

Whilst pubs nationwide have been shutting at an alarming rate JD Wetherspoon (LSE: JDW) is bucking the trend by continuing to open new pubs throughout the British Isles. As of March 2009 Wetherspoon owned 714 pubs and in the last three months has opened 16 more.

Wetherspoon's pubs concentrate on providing customers with a good selection of real ales and reasonably priced meals in a quiet environment. Contrast this with the many wannabe nightclub pubs which bang out music so loudly that people have difficulty hearing themselves think! If you pop into one of Wetherspoon's pubs in the late afternoon you'll usually see quite a few people sitting down to fish and chips and a pint whilst surrounded by their shopping.

Significantly Wetherspoon is the only pub chain which opens for breakfast and morning coffee, so it is also in competition with coffee houses such as Caffè Nero, Coffee Republic (LSE: CFE) and Starbucks.

Like many firms, Wetherspoon's shares were savaged in 2008 but have performed strongly in 2009, rising by over 25%. Many of its competitors have fared badly due to the different nature of their businesses with one, Mitchells & Butlers (LSE: MAB), having been badly hit with large losses on derivatives contracts. Wetherspoon is not paying dividends in 2009 in order to pay down debt, but its business remains profitable with reported interim earnings per share last March of 12.5p in comparison with 12.9p for the previous period. This indicates that Wetherspoon has not been badly hit by the recession.

Full-year forecasts of around 29p put the shares on a PE ratio of about 13.5 which is fairly high in today's market but reflects the prospects for further expansion at the expense of its competitors such as Enterprise Inns (LSE: ETI), which saw its earnings per share fall from 20.5p to nothing for the same period to March 2009. A lot of commercial property is going to be sold cheaply in the next few years and a large part of Wetherspoon's business is converting properties into its distinctive pubs. Wetherspoon's debts are lower than its competitors; in their 2009 interim reports Enterprise's liabilities were 85% of the balance sheet valuation of its pubs whilst the equivalent figure for Wetherspoon was 63%.

The smoking ban

The smoking ban has driven customers away from pubs, with many choosing instead to drink at home where they can smoke (home smoking is unlikely to ever be banned in my opinion as the modern state is addicted to the taxation revenue from tobacco). However, Wetherspoon's sales actually rose in 2008 thanks to its having had several years' experience of operating some non-smoking pubs and having non-smoking areas in most of its other pubs.

Of course, MPs, having passed the smoking ban, acted hypocritically by exempting themselves for the ban and they continue to smoke in the Houses of Parliament's numerous heavily subsidised bars and restaurants thus lording it over the rest of us. As George Orwell put it; "all animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others."

The rise of the pubcos

The pub business has gone through many changes in the last two decades thanks to the Acts of Parliament which were colloquially known as "beer orders." These Acts were repealed in 2003 but their combined effect had completely changed the pub ownership market away from the brewers with their tied estates towards today's market which is dominated by the commercial property companies known as "pubcos." A pubco operates by leasing its pubs to tenants, rather than run the pub itself, thus putting the financial risks of operation onto the tenant.

Wetherspoon's major competitors are the tenanted pubs owned by pubcos such as Enterprise Inns and Punch Taverns (LSE: PUB), but it also faces considerable competition from numerous owner-operated pubs and those breweries which still own pub chains such as Greene King (LSE: GNK) and Marstons (LSE: MARS).

The well-documented troubles of some of the pubcos are primarily the result of their large borrowings and the poorly performing UK commercial property market. The share prices of both Enterprise and Punch have fallen by more than 80% from their peaks mostly due to concerns over their debts, the fall in commercial property prices and the difficulties many tenants have with their leases. The privately owned pubco Admiral Taverns has recently featured in the news with Bank of Scotland reportedly facing write-offs of over £600 million against £1 billion worth of loans made to Admiral to buy pubs.

A closure that is not a closure

The House of Commons Business and Enterprise Committee recently reported that the number of reported pub closures is being exaggerated for two main reasons. The report stated that "…figures for pub closures do not adequately cover cases where individual lessees go out of business without the pub itself actually closing." Thus many "closures" turn out to be cases where the tenant stops paying the lease but the pubco either lets the pub to a new tenant or takes over its operations.

The committee also remarked that some pubcos have been selling pubs with restrictive covenants which prevent any future use of the building as a pub in order to reduce the level of competition in that locale. The committee has recommended that imposing these covenants is made illegal.

Furthermore the report also noted that "…the supply ties operated by pubcos may well be anti-competitive and may have a detrimental effect on the public house market"; it is likely that many lease failures are due to the "beer tie" and the very strict terms imposed on some tenants.

The future

The pub business, like many others, is under pressure due to the recession. However, the peculiarities of the pub market mean that Wetherspoon is far better placed than its bigger competitors to take advantage of current market conditions.

More from Tony Luckett:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

supasap 29 Jun 2009 , 6:17pm

I am not surprised by the closure of pubs, I never go into one unless I am meeting someone I know, I have tried going in them on my own and striking up a conversation but the vast majority of pub goers especially the "regulars" are boring racist homophobics who are incapable of a proper conversation. If these types represent the community then the sooner we close the community also the better. Add to this the overpriced beer and spirits and the lack of good juke boxes or worse the broadcasting of hideous mainstream music just means most of themn offer nothing to me. Keep the closures coming. As for the smoking ban....... unless the smokers were responsible for a hugely disproportionate amount of alcohol consumption then the numbers do not stack up as a cause for the decline..... there are more non smokers than non smokers and there aren't many tee totallers. The answer lies elsewhere.

sys2srf 30 Jun 2009 , 12:58pm

I disagree with supasap, my husband regularly met friends at the pub, now he is left at the bar whilst his friends have to go out and smoke as a consequence he hardly ever goes.

Pubs should have had the choice to be smoking or non smoking

MP's are in a public place and as such should be banned from smoking indoors, we pay their wages and will pay their expenses yet they dictate to us and as a consequence pubs are shutting, friendships are ending and an unhappy group of voters is growing

maskelyne 30 Jun 2009 , 3:22pm

Has anyone thought that pubs might be closing because there are just too many of them competing for the business of kids necking cheap lager as fast as they can guzzle (as supasnap advocates, since good beer and spirits are apparently vastly overpriced) and who want juke boxes because they lack any form of conversation or other social skills?

Pubs used to be a place to meet friends, chat, tell tall tales, pontificate and generally enjoy the company. Now, all the table are removed because you can stack 17 binge-drinking teenagers where each table once stood. All variety of beer has been sacrificed to the cheapest lager-for-louts, and the "music" is cranked up to avoid the need for any interaction other than the obligatory fist-fight. Who the hell (other than supasnap, of course) would want to go in these places? No wonder they're closing at a rate of knots.

Milsonman 30 Jun 2009 , 3:42pm

Not just Wetherspoons what about:

Fullers
Thwaites
Shepherd Neame
and other ale brewers.

They are not doing as badly. Most are debt free and quietly building up their pub chains as the "financially engineered mutants" shrink their estate.

andersng 30 Jun 2009 , 3:47pm

The pub in the suburb of Edinburgh where my parents live used to be a drinking & smoking hole. I would never have taken my parents in there because we couldn't stand going home smelling like kippers. Since the smoking ban, the pub has had the good sense to set itself up for a wide variety of pubgoers; the bar is a good place to sit for a drink & chat and the other half of the floor area is now a good restaurant for families, similar to some Wetherspoons pubs. We go in there for a meal every time I visit my parents and their business is obviously booming - if you want a weekend evening meal, you have to book well in advance. It's similar for other pubs that we often visit for meals. No sign of loss of customers!

selimap 30 Jun 2009 , 3:55pm

The first comments are completely missing the point about Wetherspoons and why it is a sound investment. With a decent pint of ale available at every one of its pubs (except airports and similar) for £1-39 and perfectly acceptable meals, using quality ingredients, at a very cheap price, or a morning cup of fairtrade and rainforest alliance certified coffee it provides excellent value. And no juke boxes or canned music, although most wetherspons do show major sporting events in one part of the pub. I often call in before going on to a concert, say, or if I am travelling I may choose a Wetherspoons because I know what to expect. It will never be as nice as the best independent country hostelry or a fine restuarant (but it will be cheaper). This is a well run business supplying a distinct product that appeals to a large and varied part of the population. Oh and they do good wine at cheap prices as well.

I and my partner are certainly not homophobic, or racist, or incapable of conversation, supasnap. But we are happy with the increase in value in our JDW shares, bought when we could see that the coming recession would offer great opportunities for the best value large chain of alcohol and food outlets in the UK.

You may find that boring, we don't

elaineellensteed 30 Jun 2009 , 5:38pm

Nobody really gets it do they The English Pub is an institution they were origanally the old stage coach stops and Inns in the 1700 1800 1900
This government will do anything to stop us being British they want a "cafa culture" ( which won't work )The Govenment have made sure that the bigger companies take over the majority of pubs and them they have control to put them out of business

They are getting rid of everything British so we become a a part of Europe ( If you dont agree why wasn't the monopolies and Mergers commission brought in when everything went to only 2 or three main Brewers

supasap 30 Jun 2009 , 9:43pm

if the pubs were that good and represented Englishness they would have survived, they offer nothing to me and many like me, the village ones are full of bores, the city ones are intolerable to anyone civilised and Wetherspoons is really a business competing for the alcohol and food bargain hunters, not sure if these count as pubs as ElainSteed means...... but I do find myself in these more often just because the people I tend to drink with are more cost conscious and can't stand the modern trendy (rip off) chain pubs.... ps interestingly no-one challenged the fact that the smoking thing is a total red herring...... more non smokers than smokers and few tee totallers........

Grobbendonk 01 Jul 2009 , 12:37pm

>Wetherspoon's pubs concentrate on providing customers with a good selection of real ales and reasonably priced meals in a quiet environment.

Could have fooled me - the one in my town serves "real" ale from a very narrow range, and is generally bad or even off (if I have to go there, we only drink from bottles) The food has improved recently, from "totally inedible" to "bad", but doesn't seem to be getting any better. And it was converted into a "Lloyds" which means loud music.

However, as a money column, you're spot on - Wetherspoons judges the market correctly and plays to it. In many places, this does mean a quiet pub with decent drinks, but in my town, it means competing purely on price. There is even a mentality of "lets get trashed in Wetherspoons and then go on somewhere else because it's cheaper" in the town! They are competing, and competing well, on price over quality in my town (and the nearby ones)

shirl07 01 Jul 2009 , 9:20pm

Having run pubs for over 20 years and responsibily, I might add. I am sorry to see the trade in this sorry state. Greed has brought most of the problems on. Supasap, I don't know where you are from but our trade was very diverse and never boring. We ran a tight ship, in an old fashioned type pub. All but the last one were renovated whilst we were there. We had good food menu's and won pub of the year 3 years on the trot. I agree that the price of a pint in most places is way out of line,I also think that the total ban on smoking is out of order. What happened to choice and why can't there be compromise. Glad to say that we left the trade before the trade left us.

Anoggin 03 Jul 2009 , 12:59pm

Every day of reasonable weather brings 12 hours of non-stop noise from the pub garden next door to me. During the day it's screaming children, cackling adults, and clattering china & cutlery. After dark it's more of the same, but with fewer children and louder adults. The managers frequently ignore previously set boundaries, such as a limited number of events per annum to be notified in advance to neighbours. Anyone who complains to the management is treated with disdain, or outright hostility. I'm sick of it, and I really, really hope the pub fails.

supasap 03 Jul 2009 , 7:52pm

shirlo7...... because smoking is bad for everyone including the non smokers whose air is polluted by the actions of the addicts. On top of that non smokers are in the majority so don't blame smoking ban for decline.... it will have lead to more non smokers thinking about visiting pub again.... the choice for a smoker to smoke is fair enough in a libertarian society but not as long as a non smoker is impacted then the non smoker's freedom is compromised

CHERRYCRESTA 04 Jul 2009 , 9:46am

Anoggin, how can you complain; didn't you notice there was a pub next door when you bought your house?

jahpete 04 Jul 2009 , 12:38pm

My partner and I once attended a course run by the Confederation of Professional Licensees. We were told not to make any plans for Christmas as we would all be in our own pubs by then. None of us on the course ever got a pub. A BIG FINANCIAL RIP-OFF which is still going on.
I was previously a caretaker manager of a West Indian Community Centre bar, due to the ill-health of the licensee and made numerous changes to ensure the continued profitability of the centre.
Cheaper Red Stripe Lager, constant supplies of Wray & Nephew rum at the right price and much more.
No, I'm not West Indian, myself, but I admire the culture.
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT!!!
This nanny state government brings in a new law barring smoking.
Can you imagine a West Indian Community Centre with a smoking ban???
Smoking, whether the legal sort or the abhorrent illegal Ganja stuff, is part of the West Indian culture.
I for one do not agree with the nasty stuff, but I also feel that there should be tools in place for such establishments to be able to decide for themselves whether or not to allow smoking in all or part of their premises.
Coventry West Indian Community Centre was the number one venue in the City until this ban.
Now it is a pale shadow of it's previous glory.
Nobody goes there any more.
Like many other places, it is on it's way out.
If you don't like the smoke, stay out!!
Let's get some civility back into the industry.
YES let's have smoke free pubs for those who like it that way. I would not begrudge people that, but at the same time, let those whose cultures embrace smoking continue.
As for Wetherspoons, my food is always cold before it gets to my table. Perhaps it's only the Flying Standard in Coventry, but I'd rather have hot food in a smoky atmosphere than cold food in a clean area.

supasap 05 Jul 2009 , 10:50am

so the main reason for going there was to inhale toxins into one's lungs was it? If it was for social reasons it would still be going strong but I guess it wasn't that good....

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.