A Green Light For BT

Published in Company Comment on 4 March 2009

The race for super-fast Internet access is on, as Ofcom gives the green light to BT’s next-generation network. Will BT leap-frog Virgin for the fastest in the country?

Since my first musings on BT Group (LSE: BT-A) last week, there has been some welcome news for shareholders. Ofcom has given its nod to BT's plan to build a new super-fast fibre optic network.

BT, planning to invest £1.5bn in this major rebuilding of its infrastructure, had made it clear that the project would only go ahead if the regulator would allow it to make a fair return on its investment. And yesterday, it seems the company got what it wanted.

The last mile

Since privatisation, BT has been in possession of a major asset in the form of the existing copper network that reaches from local exchanges to our households. The great advantage that gave BT over its new rivals was the reasoning behind the stringent regulatory regime it has been operating in ever since.

But that old-technology network was something of a bittersweet legacy. As BT's cable rivals, Telewest and NTL (now both subsumed by Virgin Media), rolled out their new networks, they leapt ahead of BT's capacity for delivering content. And while BT has managed to get its domestic ADSL Internet service up to a nominal 8 megabits per second (mbps), Virgin already has a nominal 20mbps service widely available and is aiming to offer 50mbs to about half the population by the middle of this year. And there's nothing BT can do about that with existing copper wires.

Deregulation

Ofcom has clearly recognised that BT's old monopoly advantage plays no part in its new plan, with chief executive Ed Richards saying "Our message today is clear: there are no regulatory barriers in the way of investment in super-fast broadband". BT will be free to set its own prices for access to its new network, which means it can charge higher prices for super-fast broadband. BT now plans to reach at least 40% of UK households by 2012, with initial speeds of 40 to 60mbps.

The news doesn't seem to have filled the market with enthusiasm, however, with the share price barely having budged.

Show us the cash

The mooted £1.5b investment is a lot of money, and in recessionary times cash really is king, so investors today will be concerned about BT's debt situation. At the third quarter mark in December 2008, it was sitting on a net debt of £11b (up slightly from the previous year). Profits were down too, due to a poor performance from BT Global Services and one-off charges of over £300m.

But the biggest concern must be the company's large and growing pensions deficit. Pension deficit payments of £320m were made in the year to March 2008, and the company is facing a review of its pension scheme in May this year which will be conducted in accordance with stricter accounting principles than previous reviews. 

BT places the deficit at £1.7b in December 2008, up massively from £0.6b just three months earlier as the value of its pension fund investments was badly hit by the fall in world markets. It now seems likely that May's review will see this figure re-adjusted upward, raising the possibility of greatly increased deficit payments over the course of the next year, with the spectre of a dividend cut looming.

Is it overdone?

While it is easy to understand investors' fears, the current share price looks as if it already reflects much of the bad news. Even if dividends for 2009 and 2010 are slashed by half from current forecasts, the shares would still be showing a dividend yield of about 5% for both years. And if earnings come in as forecast, with a P/E of around 5 it may well be that there will never be a cheaper time to buy BT shares.

On the other hand, investors might feel that, being about three years behind its rival, BT has missed the broadband boat and will lose market share in the coming years. Or, at least, that there's plenty of time to wait and see how things progress.

Personally, I'll at least be waiting for the outcome of the pension review, as any significant increase in the deficit could easily spook investors further, even at the current low share price.

More from Alan Oscroft:

You can debate BT's prospects with your fellow Fools on our BT discussion board.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

ncullum 09 Mar 2009 , 9:07am

Subsumed in?

tdg948 09 Mar 2009 , 9:14am

BT had the opportunity to be the only player in the phone and internet business,but greed opened the door for competitors,had BT charged say £15.00 for line rental and broadband everybody would still be with them,they had the phone lines in most homes but lacked the vision.

LateDeveloper 09 Mar 2009 , 9:30am

Ofcom needs their heads testing, BT have the coverage with their copper network, that other operators don't have. There should be a stipulation that once BT has the same amount of coverage with fibre, then the copper network should be returned to the government of this country or sold off to an independant company.
After all they did get it free gratis from the Government in the first place.

integradc5 09 Mar 2009 , 10:02am

Complete lack of technical understanding on the Fool as usual...

That last mile copper will still be very much part of your broadband experience, unless you live in a new build at some point in the future. BT are running fibre to the cabinet (FTTC) and the last mile will still be covered using copper, using VDSL technology. The only people to get fibre to the home (FTTH) will be where BT decides to put it in when houses are built, a la Ebbsfleet.

Do you really think BT can afford to put fibre to every door!? Neither can Virgin - they use coaxial to your home from their cabinets. So both providers are only "partial fibre" and that gives plenty of potential issues, the two main ones being:

1. The technology, like ADSL now, is asymmetric - download is much faster than upload. Fine if you're watching videos, not great if you want to send them. So for most consumers, it will be OK, but for business, it's not much better than it is now.

2. Contention - that 50Mbps on Virgin can be shared by up to 200 customers. You won't get 50Mbps to yourself! So as the services become more popular, the speeds will drop just like they have in the last few years.

Of course, the other issue is that Virgin has no money to expand its network, so anyone outside of their coverage areas is stuck with BT. If I were a shareholder, it wouldn't worry me that the competition have first mover advantage, because in many locations they haven't and will in fact never be competition at all.

There also needs to be a complete overhaul of how bandwidth and transit is charged for, because as speeds increase data transfer goes up and the "all you can eat" tariffs will disappear because ISPs can't afford to move data around within those budgets. But that's another debate...

TMFBoing 10 Mar 2009 , 7:25am

Hi integradc5,

By "the last mile" I was referring, and I quote, to "the existing copper network that reaches from local exchanges to our households", not just from cabinets to our homes - the exchange to cabinet part is crucial to increasing the availability of end-user bandwidth.

I also did not mean to imply that BT will be immediately connecting up the whole nation with fibre to the front door. The key issue is that BT is now free to compete with Virgin et al in an unregulated environment, and is planning to start upgrading its network very soon.

As for technical issues of asymmetry, shared load, etc, while obviously relevant, there just isn't space in one short article to explore them all.

Foolish regards,
Alan O


gordonbanks42 10 Mar 2009 , 9:50pm

I think integradc5 has more or less hit the nail on the head.

I live in the outer suburbs of London - not exactly the sticks - I want as much speed as I can get and I am prepared to pay for it. Virgin doesn't cover us and isn't interested in building any new capacity here. As far as I am concerned it is Virgin who is behaving like the complacent incumbent and I am glad that BT has been given the freedom to compete with them in providing high-speed services and getting a sensible return for it.

That said, I won't be hanging out the bunting until I see how fast the thing actually goes in practice.

BTW: I consider that moving to Ebbsfleet is too high a price to pay!

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.