Five Shares You Should Have Bought In February

Published in Company Comment on 2 March 2009

The FTSE 100 lost another 7.7% in February. But if you'd bought these 5 cheap shares at the beginning of the month, that frown would be wiped right off your face.

These are not fun times for stock market investors. February's 7.7% fall comes on the back of a 31% fall in 2008 and a 6.4% decline in January.

The economy stinks. The stock market stinks. The global economy stinks. In short, there’s not much good news about at the moment.

But if you'd bought these 5 cheap shares at the beginning of February, you'd be cheering from the rafters.

Property Shares CAN Rise

Amongst the mess of the economy and the stock market, there were some shining lights. Some of those lights shone brighter than others –- more on them below -– and some February gainers were somewhat surprising. For example, amidst the doom and gloom in real estate, Savills (LSE: SVS) shares jumped almost 20% higher in February.

Fellow play on the property market, leading website Rightmove (LSE: RMV) fared even better, soaring 33% in February. It just goes to prove that the share prices of individual companies can and do move independently to the state of the economy. It also proves a company can be cheap even if the outlook for its sector is poor.

The Shares You Should Have Bought

Those two property-related retailers proved surprisingly resilient. But there were some other equally impressive performers in February.

Company

Share Price

February 2009 Gain

Forward P/E

Forward Div Yield

Speedy Hire (LSE: SDY)119p45%3Nil
Hochschild Mining (LSE: HOC)220p48%161.4%
Spirent Communications (LSE: SPT)45p16%62.7%
JD Sports Fashion (LSE: JD. )280p31%43.9%
Mitchells & Butlers (LSE: MAB)224p21%11Nil

Now obviously a one-month time period is a rather short space of time over which to measure investing success. Share price gains could be due much more to luck than to good management.

In this volatile market, there is not much rhyme or reason as to why share prices move so rapidly. It might depend on what side the City traders got out of bed, on what Barack Obama ate for dinner overnight, or what Lorraine Kelly says about the state of the economy.

Bur whatever the reason, in investors in those five companies won't be complaining!

Why Such Juicy Gains?

So why did the companies listed above move so much in just a one month period?

Speedy Hire is the UK's largest provider of tools and equipment for hire. They warned on profits towards the end of January, at which time their share price slumped to just 39p. On top of that, their £255m net debt position didn't sit will with risk-averse investors. Since then, there has been some steady director buying, from prices as low as 67p, right up to 105p. The directors clearly have confidence in the health of the business, and that the debt situation is more than manageable.

Hochschild Mining is a UK-based mining company with a focus on silver and gold. The gold price has been on a tear in recent times, again breaching the US$1,000 an ounce level last month. Hochschild shares have been a major beneficiary. There are still plenty of gold bugs willing to predict the price of gold will hit US$2,000 an ounce as investors increasingly flock to its historic 'safe haven' qualities. I have my doubts, but in the meantime, gold miners are having their day in the sun.

Spirent Communications, a leading communications technology company, announced its annual results in the last week of February. Earnings per share were ahead of expectations, the outlook statement was fair, and their share price benefited. In this market, it,s the companies that don't disappoint who often see their shares rise the most. Spirent is debt free and has £60m of cash in the bank, which compares favourably with their current market capitalisation of £300m.

In a turn up for the books, in early February JD Sports Fashion reported a positive sales performance for the Christmas period, sustaining it into January. Not all retailers are basket cases, seemingly. At the same time, management "confidently expects" profit for the year ended January 2009 will marginally exceed current market expectations. Even after the shares have gained 31% in February, for a growing retailer with no debt, the shares look cheap.

Pub group Mitchells & Butlers showed there is some life in the beleaguered sector as their shares rose over 20% in February. It appears the share price rise might have had more to do with a broker upgrade and a rumoured stake-building than any great rush by drinkers back into their pubs. Debt and property-related concerns seem likely to continue to be a drag on the company’s share price.

Of the companies mentioned above, my hunch is Spirent and JD Sports Fashion might be the best of the bunch. But, I wouldn't necessarily expect any share price fireworks to follow in March.

Finding The Shares That Might Take Off In March

What does all this prove? Two things…

1) Share prices can take off, sometimes unexpectedly, at unexpected times, and by surprisingly large percentages.

2) Patience is required. All the companies mentioned above have seen their share prices absolutely hammered from their 2007 and 2008 peaks. But all need not be lost. Just because a company has lost 80% or 90% of its value, doesn’t mean it can't rise from the ashes and enrich investors who were brave and skilful enough to buy when all about them were panic selling.

If you are looking for cheap shares that might be about to take off in March and beyond, look no further than The Motley Fool's Champion Shares premium share picking service. Take out a free 30-day trial today and get instant access to all Maynard Paton’s current buy recommendations. Click here for more details.

I wish you happy investing.

More on the economy, investing and the markets:

> The Motley Fool’s Share Dealing Service also had a good February. Even better, it’s free, cheap and reliable. Buy and sell shares in real time for a flat rate of just £10. It’s hard to beat. Open an account for free today. There is no obligation to trade.

> A version of this article was also published at the beginning of February 2009.

> Bruce Jackson doesn't have an interest in any of the companies mentioned in this article.

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Daily by entering your email below.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

theRealGrinch 02 Mar 2009 , 1:57pm

the article is essentially promoting the The Motley Fool's Champion Shares Service - a noble cause.

However, the aticle does NOT say if these shares were picked by the same service prior to their rises.

uryjm 02 Mar 2009 , 4:35pm

Every other article these days is promoting the Champion Shares Service.

jonesjeff 02 Mar 2009 , 7:42pm

Any fool can identify five shares you should have bought after the event.

guykguard 03 Mar 2009 , 9:19am

This is a rare occasion for me to add my voice to the growing volume of criticism of TMF articles. I feel sure that Ben Graham would want to do the same.
In "Security Analysis" he and Graham Dodd draw two fundamental distinctions, between investment and speculation, and between "intelligent speculation" and "unintelligent speculation".
To imply, let alone to suggest with the benefit of hindsight, that investing now in any of the five stocks above constitutes sound investment advice is hardly reasonable.
A fundamental investment principle of Graham's was the "measurable margin of safety", comprising three criteria concerned with value, earning power, and growth. There must be some doubts as to whether the five stocks above qualify for such a margin.
Stock picking can rarely qualify for investment: it's speculation if not gambling. Graham was dead against gambling, as I hope TMF is, too. It would be good, too, if TMF and Mr Jackson would take care to tell us when their advice is investment advice and, if they choose to recommend speculative instruments, whether they regard them as "intelligent" or "unintelligent" choices.
Any one or all of the five stocks mentioned cannot possibly qualify for "investment" in present market conditions. Nor do all of them, on the basis of the information provided, seem to me to qualify as intelligent speculation. They simply lack the margin of safety that Graham and Dodd so rightly insisted on.
Without meaning to be too hard on TMF and its journalists, I recall a similarly hard-argued case being made about four months ago for SEGRO (SGRO.L). At the time the stock was selling for about 280p: now it's trading in the low 80s and in all kinds of trouble as the private and commercial property markets are being

guykguard 03 Mar 2009 , 9:19am

This is a rare occasion for me to add my voice to the growing volume of criticism of TMF articles. I feel sure that Ben Graham would want to do the same.
In "Security Analysis" he and Graham Dodd draw two fundamental distinctions, between investment and speculation, and between "intelligent speculation" and "unintelligent speculation".
To imply, let alone to suggest with the benefit of hindsight, that investing now in any of the five stocks above constitutes sound investment advice is hardly reasonable.
A fundamental investment principle of Graham's was the "measurable margin of safety", comprising three criteria concerned with value, earning power, and growth. There must be some doubts as to whether the five stocks above qualify for such a margin.
Stock picking can rarely qualify for investment: it's speculation if not gambling. Graham was dead against gambling, as I hope TMF is, too. It would be good, too, if TMF and Mr Jackson would take care to tell us when their advice is investment advice and, if they choose to recommend speculative instruments, whether they regard them as "intelligent" or "unintelligent" choices.
Any one or all of the five stocks mentioned cannot possibly qualify for "investment" in present market conditions. Nor do all of them, on the basis of the information provided, seem to me to qualify as intelligent speculation. They simply lack the margin of safety that Graham and Dodd so rightly insisted on.
Without meaning to be too hard on TMF and its journalists, I recall a similarly hard-argued case being made about four months ago for SEGRO (SGRO.L). At the time the stock was selling for about 280p: now it's trading in the low 80s and in all kinds of trouble as the private and commercial property markets are being

guykguard 03 Mar 2009 , 9:22am

Ooops! last line should read: "and commercial property markets are being hammered flat." My apologies.

billyboy121 03 Mar 2009 , 9:58am

Yes, I must admit I’ve sensed a general impression of the Fool moving away from an investors’ help site and mutual aid forum towards a more corporatised, self seeking, profit making model. Which is fair enough I suppose, given that it’s a capitalists’ website for capitalists in a capitalist world, but I’m less and less inclined to visit the site these days. And the new site, ‘lovemoney.com’. There’s something very distasteful in that title. Money is a tool, to be used to gain other things that you need or want, it’s a mistake to love it. Not keen on that at all.

ajfish 03 Mar 2009 , 11:51am

I have to agree with billyboy and others here, now it seems that I get 3 emails a day from Motley fool and there always seems to be some link strategically placed for you to click on. I know they have to make money, but it's just got a bit much. I get fewer emails from Amazon and they are usually the bad boys for emailing constantly trying to get you to buy stuff.
Think I am going to unsubscribe from Motley now and I have been a member since around 2000
AJ

thefool102 03 Mar 2009 , 12:36pm

Another one for the criticism of TMF articles.

Are we going to get another article in 4 weeks time - 5 shares you should have bought in March.

Or 6 lottery numbers you should have picked last saturday?

ITexpert77 03 Mar 2009 , 2:53pm

No surprise they are shares that rise a lot, as they don't belong to the FTSE 100! The article only mentions the decline percentage of the top 100 shares, i.e. the big banks, etc. The stock market has 1000s more companies. I'm curious how is the all share index doing?

Dinick 03 Mar 2009 , 10:44pm

I know that I'm not the most experienced investor, but, I do know that I don't need to told what I should have bought in Feb. I can (if I really want to depress myself) work that out for myself. What I would really like to know is what to buy tomorrow with the same certainty of a meteoric capital gain. You can do one of those articles every month (week?). Five certainties could be tricky so 2 will just fine. How about it then, what do I buy tomorrow?

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.