Five Shares You Should Have Bought In January

Published in Company Comment on 2 February 2009

The FTSE 100 lost another 6.4% in January. But if you’d bought these 5 cheap shares at the beginning of January, that frown would be wiped right off your face.

The economy stinks. The stock market stinks. The global economy stinks. Our prime minister has lost the plot – Gordon Brown thinks there were certain instances where 125% mortgages were prudent. In short, there’s not much good news about at the moment.

January is often a strong month for the stock market. Some say it’s because people come back to work after Christmas holiday break all energised, full of New Year’s resolutions, and full of hope that this year will be the one that sees their share portfolio soar to the moon.

Thanks For Nothing

Other more cynical people might say it’s all a load of baloney. Mark Twain may have hit the nail on the head when he said “October: This is one of the peculiarly dangerous months to speculate in stocks. The others are July, January, September, April, November, May, March, June, December, August and February.”

January 2009 proved the January effect, as it’s often referred to, is in fact a load of hogwash. The only effect it had this year was to send already beleaguered share portfolios yet further into the red. The FTSE 100 index slumped another 6.4%. Thanks for nothing, January 2009!

Retailing Shares CAN Rise

Yet amongst the mess of the economy and the stock market, there were some shining lights. Some of those lights shone brighter than others – more on them below – and some January gainers were somewhat surprising. For example, amidst the doom and gloom on the High Street, Marks & Spencer (LSE: MKS) shares snuck 7.6% higher in January.

Fellow retailer Carphone Warehouse (LSE: CPW) fared even better, rising 13% in January. It just goes to prove that the share prices of individual companies can and do move independently to the state of the economy. It also proves a company can be cheap even as its sales and profits are falling.

The Shares You Should Have Bought

Those two retailers proved surprisingly resilient. But they haven’t got a patch on the performance on these 5 companies in January.

CompanyShare PriceJanuary 2009 GainForward P/EForward Div Yield
Fresnillo (LSE: FRES)355p54%262%
ROK (LSE: ROK)31p51%48%
Clarkson (LSE: CKN)450p30%510%
Wellstream (LSE: WSM)477p34%7.52.6%
DSG International (LSE: DSGI)22p21%??0%

Now obviously a one-month time period is a rather short space of time over which to measure investing success. Share price gains could be due much more to luck than to good management.

In this volatile market, there is not much rhyme or reason as to why share prices move so rapidly. It might depend on what side the City traders got out of bed, on what Barack Obama ate for dinner overnight, or what Lorraine Kelly says about the state of the economy.

Bur whatever the reason, in investors in those five companies won’t be complaining!

Why Such Juicy Gains?

So why did the companies listed above move so much in just a one month period?

Frensnillo is a FTSE 100 silver and gold miner. In times of uncertainty, both silver and especially gold are seen as safe investing havens. Was it a flight to safety that boosted Frensnillo’s share price by over 50% in January? Or were the shares just plain dirt-cheap?

Rok provides development, building and maintenance services. You don’t need me to tell you how much the property sector is suffering right now. But if you managed to snag shares in Rok at the beginning of this month, you’d at least have something to smile about. Rok is valued at just £55m, has minimal debt, yet had 2007 sales of £950m. Are the shares still cheap today? Maybe.

Clarkson operates in the shipping industry, again one that is under pressure courtesy of the global economic downturn. Its share price had a buoyant January courtesy of a trading statement that merely confirmed the business hadn’t deteriorated since their last update in November. In this market, no more bad news is good news! That dividend yield looks tempting at 10%!

Wellstream Holdings is engaged in the design and manufacture of pipeline products and systems for the oil and gas industry. Again, with the oil price on the nose, and oil companies cutting back on exploration, the sector is struggling. The Wellstream share price performance in January, however, is proof once again that share prices can and do rise in a falling market and falling sector.

DSGI International, the company behind the Currys, Dixons and PC World brands, proves every dog can have his day. Sales are slumping, the company is expected to trade around break-even, there is no dividend, and the company has £150m in debt. This is a huge company revenue-wise, with annual sales of well over £8 billion, yet the market is valuing the total company at just £390m. Some investors in January obviously thought the shares were just plain cheap, whatever the short-term outlook. They may still be cheap today.

Finding The Shares That Might Take Off In February

What does all this prove? Two things…

1) Share prices can take off, sometimes unexpectedly, at unexpected times, and by surprisingly large percentages.

2) Patience is required. All the companies mentioned above have seen their share prices absolutely hammered from their 2008 peak. But all need not be lost. Just because a company has lost 80% or 90% of its value, doesn’t mean it can’t rise from the ashes and enrich investors who were brave and skilful enough to buy when all about them were panic selling.

If you are looking for cheap shares that might be about to take off in February and beyond, look no further than The Motley Fool’s Champion Shares premium share picking service. Take out a free 30-day trial today and get instant access to all Maynard Paton’s current buy recommendations. Click here for more details.

I wish you happy investing.

More: Five Top Shares At Half Price | Don't You Make The Classic Investing Mistake

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

CCSIceman 02 Feb 2009 , 2:02pm

This article is correct but to me there was an even bigger gain to be had.
I bought M& S Shares on the 2nd Jan, sold them on the 9th jan.
I then bought three further lots of M& S Shares and finally sold these on the 28th Jan.
Bought at / Sold at
2.2074 / 2.4553
2.21 / 2.3786
2.22 / 2.3786
2.3049 / 2/3786
After comission etc and not keeping any of the shares for more than 10 days i returned 9.58%, 1.66%, 5.55% and 6.03%

There is obviously great potential at the moment to make money on the stock market and by buying and selling the same shares the returns have been as ggod as three of "The shares you should have bought"
Since November last year I have made over 30% on my original investment.
As shares bump along at the bottom the secret for me is to buy and sell as they go up and down.
I think its far easier to make money at the moment than when the market just goes up.


Purm 02 Feb 2009 , 4:32pm

I am not sure what source you have for DSGI share price. I will sell you some at 95p.

Mark

rober09 02 Feb 2009 , 5:07pm

Some of the reason here surely is that we are starting from a very low point i.e 0 to 1 is an increase of 100% but I would not be tempted by it!!

I hope this not merely a marketing ploy for Maynard Payton and his tips.

Milsonman 02 Feb 2009 , 5:47pm

The volatility in the market certainly makes for some big short term gains.
Shorting 5 shares would probably made you most. Anything in Finance

mrTcrazyfool 03 Feb 2009 , 8:40am

Not to mention Barclays, Lloyds and RBS.

I bought RBS at 10p and sold at 21p. more than doubling my money virtually overnight. (I wish I had bought Barclays now!)

It was a bit of a gample but paid off!

SLazarus 03 Feb 2009 , 10:30am

Rober09's post that a jump from 0 to 1 is a 100% gain, but is still not tempted, makes me wonder whether he(or she) is using the same mathematics as the rest of us. To me that represents an infinite gain, or lets say more that 250,000 million per cent just to put a figure on it. If I had a hundred or better still a million shares for free then sold them at a pound I would be very happy, and I'm sure most other readers would jump at the chance for an almost infinite return once dealing charges are factored in. They are also incorrect to suggest the percentage gain has something to do with the initial price. But then I'm sure few readers will have been fooled by the logic expressed in that post.

guykguard 03 Feb 2009 , 11:10am

Quite so, SLazarus! Let's hope that, in her recent new appointment, Ms Vorderman can do something radical about the lamentable standards of numeracy. Dividing by zero, indeed!
Mmmm... Mr Jackson seems to be pushing shorting dodgy stocks and day trading 'em. For every trader who makes money doing this, there are many that lose a bundle -- some fools, their shirts!
A more Foolish proposal might be to hedge these risky gambles with some suggestions for going long.
An even more Foolish proposal might be to wait a few more months until the volatility indexes are a bit more reasonable?

timgee100 06 Feb 2009 , 1:26pm

While Bruce Jackson's basic argument makes sense, the sloppy data used suggests a note of caution... I have bought DSGI, but as another correspondent, Purm, says, at a much lower price than 95p. 21p, in fact.

What's going on, Bruce??

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.