Skip Navigation
 

What Not To Buy: Eighteen Month Review

<%=_author %>

By

Alun Morris

From the Fool blog

Local Police Station Is Useless!

Published in Company Comment on 30 September 2008

Falling at a rate of 72% PA, is this the worst portfolio of all time? What Not To Buy, your guide to what's deceptive, dangerous and dear.

It's been a richly rewarding time to not be buying. While your money could have nestled safely in a savings account and returned 9% since March 2007, the FTSE All Share Index has slumped 25% or 17% annualised.

17% is a nasty jab in the throat but it's a love bite compared to owning the shares in my articles. The dirty baker's dozen below have fallen 52%, and an annualised 72% (excluding Northern Rock).

These companies have failed shareholders abysmally despite garnishing their results with statements like:

"The strategy adopted by the Board over the last year has resulted in a marked improvement in the operational and financial performance"

"[Our product] has received an excellent market response and a strong endorsement from our customer base"

"I am able to report on some very positive and significant events"

"The Board views the future with optimism."

Griffin Group 

This company is a model – of destruction of shareholder value in a viable business by director greed. Despite a 71% slump in NAV per share to 1.4p, administrative costs (largely director bonuses) are still running at around £2m PA.

British Airways

Earnings forecasts continue to tumble, from 16p a share six months ago to 0.3p now, followed by a loss in 2010. This carrier is doing better than most traditional airlines but that's not a reason to own it.

Patientline

This departed in July after a long illness. It won't be missed.

Coffee Republic

Priced to go bust, despite its energetic management. Starbucks et al will continue to kick sand in the face of this under-capitalised skinny new boy.

Manganese Bronze

A disastrous year for sales and a new rival on London's streets is topped by a recall of the current model due to engine-bay fires. Everything hangs on royalties from its Chinese joint venture. There are letters of intent for 6,000 but will the meter keep ticking?

Victoria Oil & Gas

Kazakh politics and Russian tanks have not been moving in the right direction for this minnow. A raid (via the good offices of the Kazakstan judiciary) on Victoria's Kazakh assets is unresolved.

Northern Rock

A compensation figure is still many months away, though why this should be more than Bradford & Bingley, Lehman and WaMu shareholders are getting (zero) I don’t know.

iShares China

Near 10% growth continues in China though indications from reliable data such as electricity output suggest a fall is at hand.

Netstore

The white sheep of the family spoils an otherwise minty performance of the WNTB portfolio. Shareholders will receive 32p from an acquirer. 

London Town

At last, some news from this sleepy pub operator – a thumping loss of 49p per share for 2007, a change of CEO and CFO.  The firm recently declared a short term loan, for 'general working capital purposes' and at a punitive 15% interest rate. This is the second this year and is a bad sign. Despite this the share price has held up far better than its long established rivals Enterprise Inns (LSE:ETI) (down 60%) and Mitchells & Butlers (LSE:MAB) (down 40%). London Town is looking more overpriced than ever.

Playtech

Online gaming systems are winning fantastic growth for Playtech. Interim Dollar sales are 85% ahead and EPS 88%. The recent fall in the Pound boosts these figures even higher. Prospective PE has fallen from 19 when I chose the company to a more reasonable 15.8.

Coms

This hot-telecoms-sector outfit has just delivered an interim loss of 4p per share. It has its work cut out to reach the full year forecast of a 0.4p loss.

Avis Europe

Another hapless operator in a tough, increasingly price-driven sector. Avis Europe has inched nearer break-even in its latest interims but warns that "the key risks to meeting the full year target are a further fall in residual values and, more generally, a material worsening of the economic environment." That seems more like a prediction than a risk.

Here’s the WNTB table to date. Cost is the best quote from an online broker.

Buy date

Company

Cost
p

Now
p

Gain/
(Loss) %

March 2007

Griffin Group (LSE:GFF)

2.5

0.4

(84)

April 2007

British Airways (LSE:BAY)

507

179

(65)

May 2007

Patientline (LSE:PTL)

4

0

(100)

June 2007

Coffee Republic (LSE:CFE)

3.37

0.82

(75)

July 2007

Manganese Bronze (LSE:MNGS)

864

274

(78)

August 2007

Victoria Oil & Gas (LSE:VOG)

37.9

6.11

(84)

November 2007

Northern Rock

150

Delisted *

(??)

December 2007

iShares China 25 (LSE:FXC)

7765

5281

(32)

February

Netstore (LSE:NES)

23.7

31.5

33

March

London Town (LSE:LTW)

170

137.5

(19)

May

Playtech (LSE:PTEC)

543

423

(22)

June

Coms (LSE:COMS)

55 **

18

(67)

July

Avis Europe (LSE:AVE)

13.49

9.25

(31)

Average from March 2007

FTSE ALL Share Index

3330

2487

(25)

Warning: this is not a portfolio of companies to short sell. Luck, speculation and my being plain wrong may send values up sharply.

* The Government will announce shareholder compensation (if any) for the nationalised Northern Rock. It is likely to be a small amount.

** Adjusted for consolidation

Alun has a short positions in Manganese Bronze, Enterprise Inns and Mitchells & Butlers

More: What Not To Buy: Beyond The Point Of No Return

> If you think share prices are going to go up over the long-term, take a look at index trackers, a cheap and easy way to invest in the stock market.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

realist2008 01 Oct 2008, 8:18am
realist2008 01 Oct 2008, 8:26am

Alun,
though your portfolio is wackier than mine, I think we can all match this kind of drop on such shares in any particular year.

However who would have expected a bank like HBOS to lose 89%! Read and weep!

"Our (HBOS) strategy has five elements designed to create enduring value for shareholders. A clear focus on our franchise growth across UK financial services, coupled with targeted international expansion to increase the diversity of our earnings. Cost leadership to enable competitive pricing and profitability advantage. Capital discipline to ensure both sufficiency and allocation for value. The achievement of consistently outstanding performance through the development of the best team in banking."

jheenan1 01 Oct 2008, 9:14am

Thats ll well and good. However i have an even better portfolio of what not to buy- Motley fool PYAD portfolio to buy! you know the one with RBS down 70%, persimmon down 70%, DSGI down 80%. Its great to blow your trumpet but do you not think it is a good idea to come clean and continue the once a month update for those people who invested in those companies. Motley Fool is a great website full of interesting facts. However I think it would be only fair to represent ALL portfolios to give an accurate representation of your stock picking skills rather than just the ones you get right

Arborbridge 01 Oct 2008, 9:30am

jheenan1,- I can help agreeing with your point,
I don't remember seeing any HYP updates promoted lately, nor a new HYP portfolio (through embarassment?). This type of stockpicking has been a disaster over the past year or more, and as some of those companies reduce their dividend payouts the whole rationale crumbles.
Of course, the enthusiast would say this is a technique for the long term, but at the moment it looks anything but a winner. Many of the shares would have featured well in a "what not to buy" list.

onlyroz 01 Oct 2008, 12:16pm

Well I took out an ISA that tracks the AllShare on the advice of the Motley Fool. Does this advice still stand?

actiondan 01 Oct 2008, 12:52pm

I think the Motley fool do a good job of giving us sensible financial advice mostly for free. At least we've been tipped off not to go buying any of these - without having to pay for the advice.

I can't really comment on the performance of their share portfolio as I've never subscribed to it. I have tried the Fleet Street Letter & Momentum Investor though.

I really enjoyed reading the Fleet Street Letter, and they encouraged me to make my first ever share purchases. Admittedly after a little over a year though (this was just after the Iraq invasion), the FTSE had gone up substantially, but I hardly broke even with their recommendations that I'd followed. I particularly remember them strongly recommending Jarvis (which promptly plummetted) and recommending selling M&S (which promptly rose in value). At the time I considered it bad that they didn't issue an apology - but I guess that's not the way these things work - you have to accept that your investments are at your own risk.

My pension fund selection did well based on their overall market comments though. I concluded that renewing my subscription was too expensive so quit the FSL.

A few years later I tried the Momentum Investor which I also enjoy reading. While not many of their recommendations have been profitable recently (what has), they took the sensible step of holding back on adding investments to their portfolio. More sensible than me, but I can't blame them for my under-estimation of how bad things might get.

TMFVertigo 01 Oct 2008, 6:44pm

Hey guys.

The HYP portfolio was devised and written by Stephen Bland, who left TMF for private reasons - long before any of his shares dived I might add. All Stephen's articles were free.

I remain a fan of his despite any falls. Whether you're a fan of HYP or not I believe that every investor should particularly admire his consistency of methodology, lack of emotion when selecting shares, and his awareness and acceptance about where he is missing knowledge (as all of us do miss knowledge). These are three things that many investors never master, and most, I believe, don't master all three.

To provide a little balance to the above posts about the HYP method/portfolio itself, for those of you who don't know, HYP is firstly a long-term plan and secondly it's not very much about capital growth (the share price) but pretty much all about the dividend yield. That was what it was when it started and when it ended. (SB's consistency again.) I haven't tried to reconstruct the portfolio to see how it's doing in that measure, but I think it's important to do so before we simply quote some of it's shares as big capital losses and say it was all a bad idea. But, then again, I seem to recall many readers never bought that argument about the yield.

I'm not so interested in defending the portfolio, though, as in encouraging you to realise that we could still learn a lot from SB. It's worth your time searching through the Fool archives to get an insight into truly detached investing.

Neil (a Fool writer)

UpHillAllTheWay 01 Oct 2008, 8:09pm

Um .... when you say "It's been a richly rewarding time to not be buying", doesn't that smack of a suggestion about timing the market?

peepobaby 01 Oct 2008, 11:26pm

Its easy to pick a portfolio of failing stocks. Now that short selling is banned, its kind of pointless. In these times of turmoil, can the Fool experts produce a winning portfolio for nus to monitor for the next 12 months? Any ideas?

MrContrarian 02 Oct 2008, 12:12am

>Um .... when you say "It's been a richly rewarding time to not be buying", doesn't that smack of a suggestion about timing the market?

I'm pointing out that a lot of the drop in the portfolio is down to the bear market rather than my skill. I agree with Buffett that it's fatuous to try to time the market.

>Its easy to pick a portfolio of failing stocks.

Well, if was easy then it would be easy to consistently make 30% PA in a hedge fund, but they don't. Even Buffett gave up shorting.
Listing failing companies is easy but the price may more than reflect the failings. I have bought many firms on their knees. Some have failed but the ones that recover, boy do they reward the brave (or should I say greedy?).
I return to this over and over again. The price of a share is on a different axis to its quality.

>Now that short selling is banned, its kind of pointless.
You may have missed my warning under the table that "this is not a portfolio of companies to short sell." The point of the articles is to illustrate stock picking principles in a contrary way. There are hundreds of buy tips out there.
As to shorting being banned, only bank and insureres are protected in this way. You can short every pick in the table except Northern Rock, and that is delisted.

regards
Alun Morris

TMFArkle 02 Oct 2008, 7:08pm

Hi Roz,

"Well I took out an ISA that tracks the AllShare on the advice of the Motley Fool. Does this advice still stand?"

Yes, it does. But it should be a long-term investment. At least five years, preferably longer. And even then, it's not a guaranteed success.

I should add that trackers haven't been a great investment over the last ten years. But that makes me more confident that shares will do well over the next ten years. I think we'll get through this crisis, and I suspect that many of today's share prices will look cheap in a few years' time.

But there's no certainty in this. A tracker fund is not guaranteed to succeed and that remains the case now. We've always said there's an element of risk when you invest in the stock market. Even over the long-term.

Regards,

Ed Bowsher, Editor, TMF UK

TMFArkle 02 Oct 2008, 7:12pm

I'd just like to confirm Neil's point about the HYP.

Stephen Bland stopped writing for the company in early 2008, and I decided not to continue the HYP in his absence. It was very much his baby, and I wasn't sure that anyone else could carry on in the same way.

There's been a long and lively debate on the pros and cons of HYP on one of our discussion boards. Take a look if you're interested: http://boards.fool.co.uk/Message.asp?mid=11127481

Ed

TMFArkle 02 Oct 2008, 7:12pm

Hi Roz,

"Well I took out an ISA that tracks the AllShare on the advice of the Motley Fool. Does this advice still stand?"

Yes, it does. But it should be a long-term investment. At least five years, preferably longer. And even then, it's not a guaranteed success.

I should add that trackers haven't been a great investment over the last ten years. But that makes me more confident that shares will do well over the next ten years. I think we'll get through this crisis, and I suspect that many of today's share prices will look cheap in a few years' time.

But there's no certainty in this. A tracker fund is not guaranteed to succeed and that remains the case now. We've always said there's an element of risk when you invest in the stock market. Even over the long-term.

Regards,

Ed Bowsher, Editor, TMF UK

Arborbridge 02 Oct 2008, 8:41pm

Ed, Neil,

When I wrote that post about HYP, I hadn't realised Stephen Bland had stopped writing, which explains the silence. I DO miss his writing and style, and I think it's just unfortunate that many of us discovered his wisdom at a point when this type of yield investment became unpopular.
I know all his comments about income etc, but I am only half convinced. At present I'm badly burned on the HYP part of my money and even some of the income is reducing in the current round of dividend cuts. For now, it has to said, that the half of my portfolio run with stop losses and charting in mind is in the ascendant. After this slaughter, the HYP section could take a 5 years to recover.

TMFVertigo 08 Oct 2008, 2:30pm

Hi Arborbridge. I do understand!

However, I'd say that the time to use an investing style is often precisely when it's not popular.

Good luck with your HYP investments....and the rest!

Neil

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.