Skip Navigation
 

Will Barratt Bounce Back?

Published in Company Comment on 10 July 2008

Is it time to buy back into house builders or there is more pain to come?

To say it’s been a rollercoaster ride for shareholders in Barratt Developments (LSE: BDEV) would be somewhat of an understatement. The shares rose six fold from 2000 to 2007. They’ve since fallen some 95%. In fact, a few days ago Barratt was trading at 35p, less than the 36.5p in dividends it paid over the last twelve months.

Five of the seven major housebuilders have provided trading updates over the last week, with Barratt providing the final piece of the puzzle this morning. The picture across all five companies has been very similar. Completions are down by roughly a third on last year and each company has shrunk its operations to match, sadly with the loss of many thousands of jobs. Not surprisingly, dividends have been slashed or disappeared completely.

Bad though the news was, much of it was anticipated. In fact, shares of housebuilders have rebounded slightly over the last couple of days, due to relief that the figures weren’t even worse.

So far the write-downs on land and work in progress have been relatively small too. Taylor Wimpey (LSE: TW) revealed the largest write-down, wiping 11% off the value of its holdings. If house prices fall further, additional provisions will need to be made, which will hit profits and weaken already fragile balance sheets. 

Some analysts are predicting write-downs of up to 30% over the next couple of years, if the pattern of the housing slowdown in the early 1990s is repeated.

A story of debt

Although all house builders have seen their share prices slide over the last year, those with the highest debts have suffered the worst losses. Of the seven major players, Barratt and Taylor Wimpey, with debts of £1.7bn each, are in the weakest position. Barratt appears to have agreed £400m of refinancing it needs in the short term, subject to final documentation, but it’s not clear how much extra interest it will be paying. Taylor Wimpey is still looking for the £500m it requires.

With less debt, but still a worrying amount relative to the size of their business, we have Persimmon (LSE: PSN) with £900m and Redrow (LSE: RDW) with £225m. With a more comfortable level of debt, for the time being, we have Bellway (LSE: BWY) with £250m and Bovis (LSE: BVS) with £94m. Berkeley (LSE: BKG) has virtually no debt. It’s regarded as the most astute reader of the housing market and it slimmed down its business in 2004 and shifted towards urban regeneration.

The decline in house sales

The root cause of the house builders’ current problems is the decline in house sales. It looks likely that we’ll see less than 100,000 completions in England this year. Sales have only dipped below this level once since 1955, and that was back in 1981. In the early 1990s, sales also declined by a third but over a period of five years. This year’s decline happened almost overnight.

With housebuilders carrying high levels of debt they’ve had no choice but to cut back. Cash flows have also been strained by a couple of other factors. Payments for land are increasingly delayed until construction begins and substantial amounts are still due for past developments. The proportion of flats being built, almost 50% of all new properties as opposed to 15% a decade ago, also makes it harder to instantly react to market changes. You can’t really leave a block of flats half built but it’s much easier to stop a development of detached homes midway through.

Where do builders go from here?

Reading between the lines of all the recent trading statements, the builders seem to think the decline in sales has levelled off. Whether this is indeed the case depends on the availability of mortgages. 

There have some signs of improvement recently with a couple of lenders cutting rates but this is still a market in a state of flux. The Council of Mortgage Lenders has sub-titled their annual conference in early December as “After the storm”. Perhaps they know something we don’t.

The other key issue, of course, is what happens to house prices. There have been some falls to date but their impact on profits has been dwarfed by the decline in volumes. You can take your pick of house price predictions, ranging from a levelling off to a decline of 70%. We’re in uncharted waters here though, and no one has a clue what will happen next.

All this makes investing in housebuilders the classic binary bet. You’ll either make a packet or lose the lot. 

The key is assessing the likelihood of the two outcomes. I suspect that at least some of the seven companies won’t survive in their current form so I would tend to steer clear of the most debt-laden such as Barratt and Taylor Wimpey. Their borrowings are so great that the banks are effectively in control and shareholders rarely come out smiling when this happens. Those with less debt look a bit more appealing and if I had to pick any of them, I’d go for either Persimmon or Berkeley. In all honesty, I’d rather hunt for value elsewhere.

More: Demolition Work

You could buy shares in a house builder for just £1.50 commission via Motley Fool Sharebuilder

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Daily by entering your email below.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

TheImp 11 Jul 2008 , 10:31am

Two words, oversupply and overpriced. Where I live (Sheffield), the city centre is bristling with shiny new luxury apartment blocks with large numbers of them lying empty. Even developments in the suburbs have been taking longer to sell.And this isn't a recent phenomenon, many of these properties have been unsold/un rented for over 12 months. I think it's partly due to the build quality of most of them and the fact that the much needed amenities have been slow in coming. Who wants to live in a luxury apartment if you have to get in your car and drive to the nearest suburb to buy a pint of milk? Everyone I know who bought into the city living idea has moved out to the 'burbs for an improved quality of life.

Hardtruth 11 Jul 2008 , 10:37am

Assuming only 100k completions in England this year @ the average house price of £172k (June 2008) and estate agent's fees at 1.5% (assuming they process all transactions which they won't) that is a total market for English estate agents of £258M. In comparison the total residential sales market for estate agents in 2006 (marketresearch.com) was put at £4.5B. Wow!

apressbutton 11 Jul 2008 , 11:29am

I am sure of just a two things :
- Most experts will be wrong
- I will be wrong (and am not an expert)

When we produce graphs that show price falls are steeper than last time / just like last time, they are misleading.
I do think that the speed of knowledge and the quality and quantity of information available has grown immensely and is changing our behavior.

Predictions:
House prices will fall faster than before.
No-one wants to be a mug and if we are told prices are dropping, and don't absolutely have to buy, you wont. This is happening.

Price falls will happen more evenly across England - i.e. at roughly the same time/rate

If/When there is a recovery, the recovery will happen faster than before and will happen more evenly across England.

Some areas will remain insulated because of the sheer gravity of money in place - Knightsbridge/Sandbanks/Salcombe

apressbutton 11 Jul 2008 , 11:32am

The same comments apply to share prices - they are and will be more volatile than they were before 2000 (randomly choosing that year as a point when the supply of information reached the mass market)

tattiebogle 11 Jul 2008 , 6:10pm

Builders got too big and too greedy. Bad Management with no quality control, resulting in shoddy builds. All very good on marketing and promises but very short on customer service. After three years in a new-build duplex I still have snags and unfinished original scope. Do not ask me to shed a tear for the T-W and the rest.

AdrianStannard 13 Jul 2008 , 4:40pm

Yes, greed will always be man's biggest enemy, though not many choose to learn from past lessons, as far back as Homer and Sophocles (alas such people can barely read). The property bubble came about because of the same type of bulls who brought about the dot-com bubble, worried about Western stock market dot-com crash they put their cash into bricks and mortar (whilst more informed investors opted for emerging markets having done a little shorting). Wherever the bulls stamp they create bubbles, refuse to listen to common sense and argue to the critics and economists that the only way is up. Then surprise surprise, the reality emerges that there is no such thing as an infinite cash supply.

Likewise almost all houses constructed by these big builders over the last 20 years have been shoddy and small, erecting two houses where traditionally there would be one, with the architectural imagination of a communist housing committee, and eco-credentials of Jeremy Clarkson's garrulous books printed a billion times on 100% tropical rain forest paper! Given how much profit they made in the past, its amazing they even had to borrow money! These companies must be run by complete idiots! Short them / dump them whilst you can!

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.