HBOS Rights Issue, Yay or Nay?

Published in Company Comment on 4 July 2008

It’s nearly decision time for HBOS shareholders. Should they take up their rights to buy new shares in the ailing bank?

It’s been a drawn-out saga, but the rights issue at HBOS (LSE: HBOS) is now entering the final stretch. Shareholders without share certificates have until 11am on Friday 11 July to return their Form of Election saying whether how they want to proceed. Shareholders with share certificates have until 11am on Friday 18 July.

But what people should do remains far from clear. There are four basic options:

1.       You take up your rights, sending off a cheque for the full amount

2.       You partially take up your rights. In practice, you sell most of your rights and use the proceeds to buy some shares. This process is sometimes called tail swallowing.

3.       You sell all your rights and receive the proceeds which will depend on the market price at that time.

4.       You do nothing and, at the end of the rights issue process, your rights are sold and you receive the proceeds.

Under UK law, whenever a company wants to issue a substantial amount of new shares, existing shareholders get first dibs. These are known as pre-emption rights. Usually the price at which the new shares are offered is at a substantial discount to the current market price. Therefore, at first glance, it may seem like you’re getting something for nothing. You can buy shares at a discount and sell them for a profit.

What actually happens is that, all else being equal, the price of your original shares falls by the same amount as the profit you would make. No free lunch here I’m afraid. This also means that the price of the new shares doesn’t really matter.

What you’re really being asked is whether you want to put more money into a company (option 1), keep it the same (option 2) or take some out (option 3 and 4).

However, when the share price falls between the announcement and completion of the rights issue there is an additional complication. If the share price falls below the rights issue price there is no point taking up your rights as you can buy the shares more cheaply on the open market. This is why it often pays to wait and see what happens with a rights issue rather than making a decision straight away. A share price fall of this magnitude also means there will be no money available to fund option 2 and no sale proceeds from options 3 and 4.

In HBOS’s case, its shares were at 496p when it offered shareholders the chance to buy 2 new shares for every 5 held for a price of 275p. This was a massive 45% discount but the stock market has sunk over the past couple of months and speculators have helped drive HBOS’s shares down even further. The problem has been exasperated by the additional time the right issue process has taken due to the huge amount of private shareholders HBOS has. As I type, the shares are trading at 273p which is 2p lower than the rights issue price. They have been as low as 249p.

So, at this level, shareholders who intended to take up their rights are faced with a bit of a dilemma. At the moment it costs about the same to take up your rights or buy your shares on the open market. But if the share price falls further over the next fortnight you could end up overpaying for your new shares and wasting some of your money. Shareholders in Bradford & Bingley (LSE: BB) are in much the same position, following the latest news regarding its rights issue.

My crystal ball is on the blink at the moment, so I don’t know what will happen to the share price of either company over the next couple of weeks. My instinct however would be to play it safe and not to take up any rights. Both HBOS and B&B will still get the money they need from the underwriters of the two transactions. Of the two I would say HBOS has much better recovery prospects but both companies will face tough times over the next few years.

More: I’m Not Buying Banks | HBOS Hopes For A Recovery

If you'd like to find out about some attractive non-banking shares, take a free 30 day trial to our subscription investment service, Champion Shares.

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Daily by entering your email below.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

HuttonFrank 05 Jul 2008 , 9:16am

What really annoys me is the Directors of these Companies, who have obviously completely failed to do their job, will continue to vote themselves big rises and pensions, saying that "The Company has to pay market rates to get the best people." If these are the best people, it's no wonder the country is getting in such a state!

MikeMatejtschuk 05 Jul 2008 , 10:29am

Excellent point. This is why I continue to hold my shares directly and not in a nominee account and can vote against these comic rises and bonuses when the AGM comes along

timber67 05 Jul 2008 , 11:15pm

Stuart, Please excuse my O level economics logic, but surely the number of shares will increase by 40%. Therefore any future dividends will decrease by a similar figure.
The original offer of a discount of 45% was therefore no great deal. A fair price for the offer with the market price standing at 273p would therefore be cica 140p. But that would not raise the required capital. The whole excercise is a mess and I will not be writing out any cheques.

Goldtop101 06 Jul 2008 , 12:43pm

Thank you Fool; I thought I might have completely misunderstood the idea of a rights issue when the shares I was offered cost more than the current market price but now you have confirmed this crazy situation.

ccd001 06 Jul 2008 , 3:28pm

My major annoyance with this whole credit debacle is that it is entirely the banks' fault for irresponsible lending. Having to borrow money to lend money without the liquid reserves to back it up. But then, the very people on whom they have inflicted the pain are asked to bail them out through rights issues, high mortgage arrangement fees and higher mortgage rates. When are the banks going to pay for their incompetence?

Beagle2Mars 07 Jul 2008 , 12:39am

I was not impressed to read that the Directors of HBOS will retain the same percentage of shares that they had pre-offer to existing shareholders. Where is the incentive? Do I think that the Directors had no say in what the bank has done over the past three-five years? Absolute rot. Someone decided to take on unknown debt and they are in it up to their necks. The buck is also supposed to stop with them. The culprits should leave up to Director level and they should certainly have incentive to claw back market share to increase profitability for shareholders and staff alike.

afoolaloof 07 Jul 2008 , 11:21am

As a shareholder in HBOS, I voted against the rights issue. I was therefore surprised to receive my rights issue Form of Election before the voting had closed. Is the vote rigged? Guys, as well as getting on your soap boxes, please vote against these ill-conceived proposals. For any shares you hold, when you get the AGM forms, use your vote.

lawsottie 08 Jul 2008 , 12:24pm

I note that in the HBOS prospectus, p27, that the chair states taht all of the Directors intend to subscribe. Will they do this even if the current price is below the rights price?

HuttonFrank 05 Jul 2008 , 9:16am

What really annoys me is the Directors of these Companies, who have obviously completely failed to do their job, will continue to vote themselves big rises and pensions, saying that "The Company has to pay market rates to get the best people." If these are the best people, it's no wonder the country is getting in such a state!

MikeMatejtschuk 05 Jul 2008 , 10:29am

Excellent point. This is why I continue to hold my shares directly and not in a nominee account and can vote against these comic rises and bonuses when the AGM comes along

timber67 05 Jul 2008 , 11:15pm

Stuart, Please excuse my O level economics logic, but surely the number of shares will increase by 40%. Therefore any future dividends will decrease by a similar figure.
The original offer of a discount of 45% was therefore no great deal. A fair price for the offer with the market price standing at 273p would therefore be cica 140p. But that would not raise the required capital. The whole excercise is a mess and I will not be writing out any cheques.

Goldtop101 06 Jul 2008 , 12:43pm

Thank you Fool; I thought I might have completely misunderstood the idea of a rights issue when the shares I was offered cost more than the current market price but now you have confirmed this crazy situation.

ccd001 06 Jul 2008 , 3:28pm

My major annoyance with this whole credit debacle is that it is entirely the banks' fault for irresponsible lending. Having to borrow money to lend money without the liquid reserves to back it up. But then, the very people on whom they have inflicted the pain are asked to bail them out through rights issues, high mortgage arrangement fees and higher mortgage rates. When are the banks going to pay for their incompetence?

Beagle2Mars 07 Jul 2008 , 12:39am

I was not impressed to read that the Directors of HBOS will retain the same percentage of shares that they had pre-offer to existing shareholders. Where is the incentive? Do I think that the Directors had no say in what the bank has done over the past three-five years? Absolute rot. Someone decided to take on unknown debt and they are in it up to their necks. The buck is also supposed to stop with them. The culprits should leave up to Director level and they should certainly have incentive to claw back market share to increase profitability for shareholders and staff alike.

afoolaloof 07 Jul 2008 , 11:21am

As a shareholder in HBOS, I voted against the rights issue. I was therefore surprised to receive my rights issue Form of Election before the voting had closed. Is the vote rigged? Guys, as well as getting on your soap boxes, please vote against these ill-conceived proposals. For any shares you hold, when you get the AGM forms, use your vote.

lawsottie 08 Jul 2008 , 12:24pm

I note that in the HBOS prospectus, p27, that the chair states taht all of the Directors intend to subscribe. Will they do this even if the current price is below the rights price?

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.