Skip Navigation
 

Marks & Spencer Makes A Billion

<%=_author %>
By Rodney Hobson | 20 May 2008

Profits have topped £1 billion at Marks & Spencer (LSE: MKS)  but chief executive Sir Stuart Rose has much to do to justify his appointment as chairman.

Pre-tax profits for the 52 weeks to 29 March jumped 20.5 per cent £1.13 billion. After stripping out gains on property disposals and other exceptionals, the improvement was a more modest, though still reasonable, 4.3 per cent. This was better than analysts had expected.

Sales rose 5.1% to just over £9 billion with the UK 4.2 per cent ahead and the much smaller international side up 16.8 per cent.

However, these bare figures cannot hide the fact that the UK side is struggling. UK like-for-like sales actually slipped 0.5 percent over the 12 months, with food performing nearly as poorly as general merchandise despite heavy TV advertising.

In fact, M&S failed to beat the targets it set itself in April last year for the payment of bonuses, although it will be dishing out £12.8 million to teams in the stores anyway. What is the point in setting bonus targets if payments are made when targets are missed?

Things are getting worse rather than better on the general merchandising side, where sales at stores that had been open for more than a year slumped 3.1 per cent in the final quarter. The only thing one can say in favour of this figure is that it was nothing like as bad as the performance at great rival Next (LSE: NXT) .

Food has fared better but was still down 0.5 per cent year on year.

So why have overall sales moved up when the same store numbers are weak?

M&S sales have been driven by three factors. The chain opened new stores, thus increasing selling space by 4.8 per cent. It refurbished 35% of existing outlets, so 70% of the portfolio has now been modernised.

Secondly, the belated move into online shopping is quickly bearing fruit. Thirdly, international profits were up by a third, with 20 per cent extra space added in the year, mainly in central and eastern Europe and in India. A store is due to open in Shanghai this autumn, the first in China.

Tougher times

Rose points to ‘tougher economic conditions' in the second half of the financial year. He expects market conditions to remain difficult for the foreseeable future.

Trading for the first seven weeks of the current financial year has been mixed. April was a difficult month, reflecting ‘dramatically different weather patterns' compared with the same period last year. May to date has shown a marked improvement.

An update on first quarter sales will be issued on July 9.

An early modest rise in the share price after the results came out soon dissipated, though a sharp fall in the FTSE 100 index hardly helped. M&S was down 14p at 403p.

With the dividend total up 23 per cent at 22.5p, there is plenty of compensation for investors seeking income. With a forward price/earnings ratio of 10 and the prospective yield at 5.6%, the difficult trading conditions look to be priced into the shares.

After falling from 700p a year ago M&S shares seem to have settled around 400p. They could be worth looking at below that level despite the obvious worries over consumer confidence.

More: On Your Marks...Get Set...Oops!

Rodney Hobson is the author of Shares Made Simple

Take a look at Motley Fool Sharebuilder where you can buy shares for no commission until June 30th.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool.

At 09:16 on May 21 2008, Beagle2Mars said:

Good M&S are going into China, so long as they realise it will have to be a Chinese model and not a British one. So many aspects for Sir Stuart Rose to look at, it's a good thing that he will have two Deputy Chairmen. Focus on benefits to the customer. Is the £12.8 million staff payout for trying? That shows the British mentality; the Americans would only get it on results. Who's to say the British won't try harder next time? Do the M&S Directors not care about the share price?

At 10:00 on May 21 2008, purefolly said:

Given the current market conditions it seems to me that Stuart Rose is doing the right thing by re-investing by improving the infrastructure and refreshing the brand. As for the staff bonuses: my guess is that many of the staff benefits which on the one hand promoted loyalty but on the other, possible apathy, have now been removed and staffing numbers reduced. So the bonus is now the key staff incentive and I would think it sensible if the exec were to exercise reasonable judgement on the terms of the payout. Shareholders should not be the only beneficiaries.

At 13:02 on May 21 2008, sstudent said:

M&S may not be huge money earners for share holders but they are a solid company & in the medium to lond term a good company to hold shares in.

At 14:24 on May 21 2008, kanga54 said:

I work for M&S and I take great umbridge with one of your other correspondents who says we don't work hard.The targets they set were far too high and the folks working in the stores knew it would be impossible to reach them so bang goes our bonus.I bet Stuart Rose gets a nice little bonus though.!!!!!!!!!!!

At 15:56 on May 21 2008, TMFArkle said:

Hi Kanga,

Rodney Hobson wasn't saying that store staff don't work hard. He was just arguing that it seems strange from the outside to set bonus targets, and then pay out when the targets aren't met.

If the original targets were too demanding, then that reflects badly on m and s management. (But not on store staff.)

Regards,

Ed Bowsher, TMF Editor

At 18:44 on May 21 2008, al1892 said:

I also work for Marks and Spencer and just thought id try and help put this bonus malarky into perspective. It is goes up to a maximum of £250 and isonly for staff in store not for managers or above who were the ones set the targets. Therefore as people had said, the ones who missed their targets DO miss out on a bonus. The bonus for store staff is compensation in light of the woefully inadequate staffing levels they have left us with this year in order to squeeze out the money to make the infamous £1bn mark. Personally for that kind of bonus I'd have much rathered had enough staff to be able to do our job properly.

At 19:55 on May 31 2008, paul1594 said:

i am also a employee of m&s in bangor n.i its the model store for n.i and it has not always hit targets but that is not the managers or our faults it the fact that people are not spending the money! i work in the coffee shop and it has lifted 256k over the plan we had very little staff and alot of pressure and they reward us buy cutting our bonus from £500 to £250! its still something but the managers will be worse off because they bonus means they get a pay rise aswell! the managers in northern ireland get a smaller bonus which is more than the rest of the uk get! they are slowly takin away all benefits that the public think we get waste which used to be a 1/4 of the price has doubled! free shares gone!

Join the conversation

Hello stranger. Please[log in]to comment.

Not yet registered? Register now.

 

Switch to a different topic area

Can't find what you need in Investments? Try one of our other personal finance areas.

Latest stories

Get all the latest news and editorial comment as it's published – check out our Fool Articles