Skip Navigation

Ready For A Meltdown

<%=this._contentDocument.Byline%>
By Maynard Paton | 23 April 2008

A few months ago, my research for Champion Shares led me to London & Stamford (LSE: LSP) . I think this share is one of the most appealing opportunities in the commercial property sector right now.

London & Stamford joined AIM during November and raised £238m in order to be "well placed to capitalise on the correction that the [management] anticipate in the property market". Back then, the board claimed commercial property had reached an "unsustainable point" and did not support "initial yields below 5%" and "borrowing and margin costs of over 6.25%". Statistics from IPD, the property research firm, indicate commercial property prices have declined 7% since the float.

One attraction to London & Stamford is the simple accounts. There is no trading history to analyse and the balance sheet just consists of cash, debt and a few commercial properties dotted around the country.

Following the flotation and a subsequent disposal, I reckon the bank balance is about £259m (or 91p per share) while the flotation document reveals borrowings of £39m (13p) and property with a £55m valuation (19p). The net asset value is thus 97p per share, a fraction below the current 102p share price.

With pots of money to invest, London & Stamford's board is critical to this share and the flotation document reveals an encouraging management background. The three principal directors each have more than 30 years' experience in the industry and have twice sold out at market tops.

Their first investment firm was called Arlington, which they sold in 1989 for £278m after tripling shareholders' money during a three-year stock market stint. The managers then formed Pillar Property in 1991, when "the UK property market was in recession" and was "characterised by quality assets being offered cheaply by forced sellers". Pillar was sold in 2005 for £811m after achieving a 22% annual average return following its 1994 flotation.

The talented board does not come cheap, though. Although the key directors own shares with a £12m market value (about 4% of the group), they will also collect 1.75% of the group's net asset value as a basic annual fee. At present, that equates to about £5m and is not adjusted for un-invested cash. In addition, the bosses will enjoy a performance fee if net assets grow by 10% although this does ignore interest earned from the bank.

Overall, I think London & Stamford is a very interesting opportunity for investors that believe the commercial property market is heading for a meltdown. It's flush with cash and, most importantly, the group's bosses have proven experience of exploiting the sector's ups and downs.

That said, bear in mind the possibility that any "forced sellers" may take a few years to come out of the woodwork. Looking back at Pillar, the management's previous business, I see the share price never really got going until 1996, a year or two after the flotation and about six years after the previous property peak.  

Maynard writes Champion Shares, the Fool's share-tipping service. This 30-day free and no-obligation trial to the Champion Shares community gives you complete access to Maynard's favourite shares.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool.

At 11:08 on April 24 2008, purefolly said:

Sounds like a good tip but personally I would struggle with investing in a business that seeks to make money from others' misfortune.

At 12:51 on April 24 2008, geebeepee said:

In answer to purefolly -isn't that what the stockmarket has and will always be about-the winners making money on others mistakes.

At 18:37 on April 24 2008, LandOfConfusion said:

No not really. In the case of the stockmarket you are (generally) making money from the success (profit) of the companies that you are investing in.

On the other hand, while I personally don't see the problem with companies making a profit at other companies misfortune, I do see a problem when individuals and companies do this with residential housing. Making house prices higher so that a few people can make insane profits at the expense of everyone else is morally wrong.

But then as I'm not a Liebour supporter I would say that wouldn't I?

Join the conversation

Hello stranger. Please[log in]to comment.

Not yet registered? Register now.

 

Switch to a different topic area

Can't find what you need in Investments? Try one of our other personal finance areas.

Latest stories

Get all the latest news and editorial comment as it's published – check out our Latest Stories

© Copyright 1998-2008, The Motley Fool Limited. All rights reserved. This material is for personal use only.
The Motley Fool, Fool, and the "Fool" logo are registered trademarks of The Motley Fool, Inc.
Place of Reg: England & Wales. Company Reg No: 3736872. VAT Reg No: 735 7818 01. Registered Office: 30 Great Pulteney Street, London W1F 9LT.


USEQ\EQWEB10