Skip Navigation
 

Royal Bank Finally Bites The Bullet

David Stevenson
By David Stevenson | 22 April 2008

The second worst kept secret of the last seven days was finally revealed today as Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS) unleashed Europe's biggest-ever rights issue.

Royal Bank of Scotland is raising a net £12bn to help shore up its subprime-ravaged balance sheet, while ‘fessing up to a further write-down of £5.9bn and a 2008 payout cut.

The big issues now facing investors are...

Is the bad news now ‘in the price', or has RBS further to fall?

And should shareholders take up their rights?

Before addressing those thorny questions, here's some background..

A rights issue enables a company to refill its coffers by selling extra shares to stockholders, whose incentive for stumping up is the right to buy these new shares at a discount.

No doubt some shareholders will want to take the opportunity to invest fresh cash into RBS.

However, if a shareholder doesn't want to invest any fresh cash, he can sell his new shares in 'nil paid' form. In other words, he sells the new shares after they have been created - when they go 'ex-rights' - but before they have to be paid for. Of course, if he does sell the new shares, his remaining interest in the company has been significantly diluted.

RBS is offering 11 new shares for every 18 existing shares at an issue price of 200p a shot. Based on the stock price of 358p at 9.30am today, that works out at a current discount of 44%, and a 33% discount to the theoretical ‘ex-rights' price of 298p.

The stock market being disinclined to hand out free lunches, the price of the old shares automatically adjusts downwards on ‘ex-rights' day. ‘Nil paid' trading is expected to start in mid-May, with dealings in new ‘fully paid' shares kicking off in June.

What's the picture now for RBS?

The bank has made several recent errors, including the top whack €72bn paid by its consortium for ABN Amro last year.

It's also had to mark downs its assets today by £5.9bn following the £2.4bn hit already incurred in February. With that background, RBS has chosen now to take the plunge in rebuilding its capital ratios.

The bank is also looking to raise £4bn from disposals of units like insurance, which includes the Direct Line and Churchill brands, although "undervalued" assets won't be dumped in a "fire sale".

More investment banking jobs are being chopped than initially expected. And shareholders will also share the pain as the current year dividend will be cut by an unspecified amount.

So what of the future?

Despite the predictable official expression of confidence in the ability of the executive team, the outlook is "inevitably clouded" by US subprime mortgage turmoil.

And financial watchdog Moody's suggested today that a combo of concerns over volatile capital markets, the size of the write-downs, the integration of ABN Amro and more UK economic risk may force a downgrade of the bank's debt ratings.

That doesn't breed too much confidence that there won't be more skeletons to emerge from the parlour.

As for the share price...it's stating the bleedin' obvious, but with a 61% increase in the number of shares in issue, there's unlikely to be a stock shortage in the near future.

Bank of England Governor Mervyn King has already endorsed bank rights issues, and expects to see others.

Which probably means much more money being sought by indigent lenders, plenty more shares sloshing around for investors to absorb, and a recipe for lower prices.

For shareholders, taking up the offer makes a lot of sense if you think the credit crisis is nearly over.

However, I'm pessimistic. I believe there's still a long way to go before financial markets are out of the woods. I'd be selling the ‘nil paid' rights.

More: Bail Out Monday | What Is A Rights Issue?

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool.

At 06:54 on April 23 2008, mopinwil said:

I do hope that the measures the RBS are taking by (Rights Issue) are taken up as at least they are addressing the problem and it is one means by which they may pull themselves (shareholders) out of the mire. That and with Government backing it should help stave off the worst.

Even if the problem is caused by the American sub-prime market the problem has occurred and if everyone does there bit and stands firm and does not panic then it will be all the better for the people caught in between a rock and a hard place, namely the people with mortgages and in the end the shareholders because they will still have stock in their hands. After all what is the alternative. Misery for people who don't own their homes anymore and a very unsteady market.

Time to pull the leather belts in another notch and weather the storm.

At 08:14 on April 23 2008, laalaa41 said:

I think the keyword here is "confidence", which is(in my view) 9/10s psychological and 1 part based on facts. I do wonder how much the media is to blame for whipping us up into this frenzy while what the ordinary man in the street experiences incredible increases in prices across so many areas of life. This "crunch" is arguably manufactured to exploit a situation entirely of the financial world's own making. It is hard too, for us to feel any sympathy for corporations who have announced record profits in the past few years.

At 09:39 on April 23 2008, djabbott said:

It's surely high time for the RBS Chief Executive & other senior officers/advisers to ride off quietly (& cheaply!) into the sunset, never to be seen again? They've demonstrated huge strategic ineptitude particularly in greedily paying way over the odds for ABN-Amro, partly to stop competitor Barclays getting its hands on the Dutch bank. To anybody with clear vision, all the bad writing that everyone can now see was clearly on the wall a year ago & it was totally wrong for RBS to be piling up more huge risks on top of those it had already taken. I don't understand why the Government (i.e. Taxpayers) & the beleaguered RBS Shareholders should now be forced into paying the price for very poor management. Heads need to roll.

At 10:03 on April 23 2008, cynicalthinker said:

What is the best course for someone with an RBS offset mortgage? Do they stand to lose out if the bank fails, or would withdrawing any savings merely contribute to another northern rock style crash? Is it merely a decision between personal security and the greater good? If the RBS can be in this position how safe can anywhere else be? Just don't know what to trust anymore.

At 12:04 on April 23 2008, mevans6890 said:

Will there really be a 61% increase in the number of shares in issue. Without looking at the actual figures I find that hard to believe!! If that is right there is a severe level of dilution!!!

At 14:10 on April 23 2008, Honky81 said:

cynicalthinker,

The Northern rock debacle did not happen on the back of people withdrawing their money. "only" £2bn were withdrawn, yet they still needed in excess of £20bn of emergency funding.

Remember your savings are protected up to £33k with any one institution, so as long as you are within these limits you should be fine.

At 23:22 on April 23 2008, estaco said:

If you have RBS shares in a sipp pension and are in drawdown and are therefore unable to add any cash to the sipp but do not have the cash available within the sipp to take up the rights issue for the shares you already hold, are you just forced to accept the dilution of your shareholding with no way to purchase the rights issue shares.

At 10:08 on April 24 2008, AdAstra100 said:

Unfortunately, estaco, if you also hold them in an ISA you have a similar problem. If you are also now using the income to supplement a pension income, as I am, this is again difficult.
AdAstrs

At 19:17 on April 24 2008, JTYF said:

Estaco, why having RBS shares in an ISA would create problems for getting shares through the Rights Issue? The ISA is just a wrapper, isn't it? Am I right in assuming that the purchase of additional shares through the Rights Issue could be done through this year's ISA allowance or outside of it?

At 20:51 on April 24 2008, cosimino said:

i agree with one of the previous comments the media have made the most of this and spreading fear. it obviously is a recession but no way like the 1930's.

At 13:05 on April 25 2008, teecee90 said:

I agree. The media (including David) have a lot to answer for. But then, they are in the "entertainment" business after all.

At 11:04 on May 19 2008, laalaa41 said:

Entertainment? Im going to look into my Crystal Ball and predict.... financial institutions, supermarkets, energy companies - all those who hiked up their prices disporportionately, simply to maximise their profits in cynical fashion - taking advantage of this media frenzy. Well, they will see record profits (again) but only for a little while because while they were making hay - their customers were going to the wall. You cant have a business without the goodwill of a) your staff and b) your customers. Bye Bye you greedy lot.

Join the conversation

Hello stranger. Please [log in] to comment.

Not yet registered? Register now.

 

Switch to a different topic area

Can't find what you need in Investments? Try one of our other personal finance areas.

Latest stories

Get all the latest news and editorial comment as it's published – check out our Fool Articles