Why Ed Balls Is Wrong About Royal Bank Of Scotland Group plc

There’s a fatal flaw in Ed Balls’ reasoning about the government’s ‘investment’ in Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (LON: RBS).

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

If he gets the chance, Ed Balls should sell Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS) (NYSE: RBS.US) shares fast, rather than hold on to them.

A laudable goal

In recent news, Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer Ed Balls reckons a British government run by the Labour Party would hold off selling its majority ownership in Royal Bank of Scotland so that taxpayers get their money back.

I can’t argue with the warm sentiment behind such a declaration. After all, every investor wants to get more back from an investment than he or she puts in. Even if an investment underperforms our expectations, we at least want to get our money back.

However, apparently missing from Mr Balls’s assessment is any calculation on the risk the government will be taking by holding the shares. The longer the hold, the more the odds of an unsuccessful outcome begin to stack up, in my view. “I’m not selling until they go back up,” is scant justification for a ‘hold’ in the cutthroat world of investing.

Working on the assumption that Royal Bank of Scotland shares will go up from here looks like something of a shaky proposition. They may, but there are also many reasons to suppose that they may go down, too.

Still in the hole

The government bunged £45 billion of taxpayer’s money at Royal Bank of Scotland Group in 2008, as the financial crisis thumped into the UK’s financial and economic system and banks found themselves air running like Wile E. Coyote, as the land gave way to the canyon.

Our government still finds itself saddled with around 80% of what was, at the time, a financial house of cards. RBS’s plans didn’t work out and that led to the nation’s bailout money seeing the government take ownership of the bank at about 502p per share, after the firm posted the biggest annual corporate loss in Britain’s entire history.

Today’s 360p or so shows how far there is still to travel if the government wants to get its money back. The situation seems even more dire when we consider that the shares floated around this level since early 2013 — more than two years. So why aren’t the shares making progress?

A double drag

UK-focused banks, such as RBS, face an ongoing double drag on share-price progress, which renders them unattractive as an investment proposition, or even as a ‘hold’.

There’s some evidence that regulators’ rhetoric is ratcheting up. Just this week news reports came through citing a senior Bank of England official saying that it will take another five years or more to make real inroads into the dominance of Britain’s five biggest banks. So, not only will regulators keep the banks in check, they will hack them down in size as well. That’s a powerful current dragging against a longer-term investment in RBS.

The other big problem for RBS and its peer banks is their close attachment to general macro-economic cycles. Banks are cyclical to the very core, and that’s what makes them dodgy buy-and-forget investments. Share prices in the sector rise and fall with profits, and cash flow in line with the undulations of the macro-economic cycle.

That’s why the stock market marks down the value of banks as we progress through the up-curve of the economic cycle — right now, in other words. There’s often gradual P/E compression in anticipation of the next peak-earnings event as the cycle unfolds. I think the valuation-compression effect we see with cyclical firms such RBS is the second drag against total investor returns for holders like the British Government.

End game

The longer we hold bank shares now, the closer we get to the end game. It won’t be pretty. The final big share price movement will likely begin with peak profits and end with share-price collapse near by. After that, it’s rinse and repeat. If he insists on waiting to get his money back, Ed Balls could be waiting a very long time…

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Kevin Godbold has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Could the JD Sports Fashion share price double in the next five years?

The JD Sports Fashion share price has nearly halved in the past five years. Our writer thinks a proven business…

Read more »

Bus waiting in front of the London Stock Exchange on a sunny day.
Investing Articles

If interest rate cuts are coming, I think these UK growth stocks could soar!

Falling interest could be great news for UK growth stocks, especially those that have been under the cosh recently. Paul…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Are these the best stocks to buy on the FTSE right now?

With the UK stock market on the way to hitting new highs, this Fool is considering which are the best…

Read more »

Petrochemical engineer working at night with digital tablet inside oil and gas refinery plant
Investing Articles

Can the Centrica dividend keep on growing?

Christopher Ruane considers some positive factors that might see continued growth in the Centrica dividend -- as well as some…

Read more »

Smiling family of four enjoying breakfast at sunrise while camping
Investing Articles

How I’d turn my £12,000 of savings into passive income of £1,275 a month

This Fool is considering a strategy that he believes can help him achieve a stable passive income stream with a…

Read more »

Person holding magnifying glass over important document, reading the small print
Investing Articles

2 top FTSE 250 investment trusts trading at attractive discounts!

This pair of discounted FTSE 250 trusts appear to be on sale right now. Here's why I'd scoop up their…

Read more »

Smiling young man sitting in cafe and checking messages, with his laptop in front of him.
Investing Articles

3 things that could push the Lloyds share price to 60p and beyond

The Lloyds share price has broken through 50p. Next step 60p? And then what? Here are some thoughts on what…

Read more »

Young female business analyst looking at a graph chart while working from home
Investing Articles

£1,000 in Rolls-Royce shares a year ago would be worth this much now

Rolls-Royce shares have posted one of the best stock market gains of the past 12 months. But what might the…

Read more »