Does Marks and Spencer Group plc Pass The Woolworths Test?

Shares in Marks and Spencer Group plc (LON:MKS) climbed 16% in two days.

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

If you were listening to the Today programme on Radio 4 on Wednesday morning, you may have heard presenter Justin Webb ask a neat variant on what’s become known as ‘the Woolworths test’.
 
He was speaking to Marc Bolland, chief executive of beleaguered retailer Marks & Spencer (LSE: MKS), which at the time of writing has seen its shares climb 16% since announcing signs of a modest recovery in its fortunes.
 
And here’s what Justin Webb asked him: given Marks & Spencer’s perennial success with food and underwear, was there a case for ditching the rest of the store’s offerings, and just focusing on those two categories? In other words, should Marks & Spencer just sell food and undies?
 
Sensibly, Mr Bolland chose to ignore the question.

Tastes change

Nevertheless, despite its semi-jocular nature, it was a question that cut to the heart of the quandary that has faced Marks & Spencer over the past few years. And I speak as a long-suffering shareholder.
 
For it’s a quandary that takes us back to the Woolworths test, first posed back when former High Street retailer Woolworths was demerged out of Kingfisher and floated in August 2001.
 
Which is this: If Woolworths didn’t exist, would you invent it?
 
A question which was duly answered in December 2008, when the venerable business was finally thrown onto  the scrap heap, along with its eclectic mix of cheap (and mostly tacky) books, toys, games, children’s clothes, music CDs, garden equipment, pick-n-mix sweets and much else besides.

Former glories

Now, I’m the first to admit that Marks & Spencer has had its challenges in recent years. And that the cracks in the edifice first began appearing under the reign of Sir Richard Greenbury, almost twenty years ago.
 
Nevertheless, I continue to wish the company well. My late father had a long association with the business, and my own shareholding dates back to a purchase he originally made in 1992.
 
And for many years, Marks & Spencer did a lot of things right — including placing a value on social and ethical responsibility that extended into the employment conditions of its suppliers. Which is something that some other retailers could learn from, even today.
 
Moreover, let’s not forget that back in the Greenbury era, Marks & Spencer was the second most profitable retailer in the world, achieving over £1 billion in pre-tax profits in 1998, for example.

As with Woolworths, so with portfolios

So what does the Woolworths test tell us about Marks & Spencer now? There are, I think, two points to make.
 
The first is that Justin Webb’s jocular suggestion of a retailer selling only food and underwear is a non-starter.
 
Marks & Spencer needs to make its existing product mix work, and once again become a business that Britons shop at, as well as hold in some affection. And those Britons, needless to say, must encompass a broader age demographic than currently seems to be the case.
 
The second point is a more subtle one.
 
And it’s this: the Woolworths test has a relevance not just for individual shares, but whole portfolios.

Is the investment thesis still valid?

Share portfolios, let’s face it, evolve over time. Takeovers and acquisitions leave us holding shares in companies that we might not have bought, or leave us holding cash in place of shares we bought.
 
Some companies fare well, and see their share prices rise. Others fare poorly, and see their share prices fall. In both cases, the effect is to distort their overall worth within our portfolios.

Other companies simply fall out of fashion, or — in the long term — belong to sectors which fall out of fashion, or experience adversity. The dotcom duds of 2001 were followed a few years later by the finance failures of 2007-2008.
 
And so on, and so on.

Dead capital

So the portfolio version of the Woolworths test is this:
 
If I didn’t already own these shares within my portfolio, and in their current proportions, would I buy the same shares, in the same proportions, today?
 
Which is a question that doesn’t get asked as often as it should. Countless reasons — inertia, loss aversion, blind hope and outright folly — cause us to grimly cling on to shares, even though the original investment thesis is no longer valid.
 
They’re not doing any harm,” we tell ourselves, as we survey the duds clogging up our portfolio.
 
But they are. They most certainly are. Because those shares represent capital that could arguably be put to better use elsewhere, buying shares in businesses where the investment thesis is still valid.

So there’s no point being sentimental about it. If it’s a lack of capital that prevents you from grabbing some of the bargains that today’s market is throwing at us, take a long hard look at your portfolio, and ask:
 
‘If I didn’t already own it, would I buy it again today?’

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Malcolm owns shares in Marks & Spencer.

More on Investing Articles

Investing Articles

Could the JD Sports Fashion share price double in the next five years?

The JD Sports Fashion share price has nearly halved in the past five years. Our writer thinks a proven business…

Read more »

Bus waiting in front of the London Stock Exchange on a sunny day.
Investing Articles

If interest rate cuts are coming, I think these UK growth stocks could soar!

Falling interest could be great news for UK growth stocks, especially those that have been under the cosh recently. Paul…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Are these the best stocks to buy on the FTSE right now?

With the UK stock market on the way to hitting new highs, this Fool is considering which are the best…

Read more »

Petrochemical engineer working at night with digital tablet inside oil and gas refinery plant
Investing Articles

Can the Centrica dividend keep on growing?

Christopher Ruane considers some positive factors that might see continued growth in the Centrica dividend -- as well as some…

Read more »

Smiling family of four enjoying breakfast at sunrise while camping
Investing Articles

How I’d turn my £12,000 of savings into passive income of £1,275 a month

This Fool is considering a strategy that he believes can help him achieve a stable passive income stream with a…

Read more »

Person holding magnifying glass over important document, reading the small print
Investing Articles

2 top FTSE 250 investment trusts trading at attractive discounts!

This pair of discounted FTSE 250 trusts appear to be on sale right now. Here's why I'd scoop up their…

Read more »

Smiling young man sitting in cafe and checking messages, with his laptop in front of him.
Investing Articles

3 things that could push the Lloyds share price to 60p and beyond

The Lloyds share price has broken through 50p. Next step 60p? And then what? Here are some thoughts on what…

Read more »

Young female business analyst looking at a graph chart while working from home
Investing Articles

£1,000 in Rolls-Royce shares a year ago would be worth this much now

Rolls-Royce shares have posted one of the best stock market gains of the past 12 months. But what might the…

Read more »