3 FTSE 100 Shares That Surged 1,000% In 10 Years

Published in Investing on 27 February 2013

Harvey Jones can only sit back and admire the smooth long-term performance of Rolls-Royce (LON:RR), ARM Holdings (LON:ARM) and Aberdeen Asset Management (LON:ADN).

The power of 10

Every investor dreams of that elusive 10 bagger, the stock that multiplies every pound or dollar you invest by 10. You might think this only happens with smaller companies, but given time, the FTSE 100 can throw up a few 10 baggers as well. Or in some cases, 20 baggers.

At least 10 stocks on the index have delivered a total return of 1,000% or more over the last decade, including one 20 bagger, according to research from Fidelity Worldwide Investment. And the top three are…

Rolls-Royce Holdings

If you had invested in aeroplane engine maker Rolls-Royce (LSE: RR) 10 years ago, in March 2003, you would be purring over your total return of 2,098%. Talk about a Rolls-Royce performance. That's what you get when a company delivers 10 successive years of profit growth, and you reinvest its dividends year after year, to turbo-charge that growth. When they say the British can't do manufacturing, Rolls-Royce shows we can. It isn't just good in the air, with its civil and defence aerospace business, it also outperforms on land and sea, working across marine, energy and nuclear.

Rolls-Royce doesn't just make stuff, it also has a hugely profitable range of comprehensive service packages for managing engines throughout their life-cycle, giving its solid, repeat income. In 2012, its order book increased by 4%, underlying revenue by 8% and underlying profit by 24%. Add to that a £60 billion order book, and the next 10 years look promising as well. Back in 2003, you could have bought it for 64p. Now you have to pay 1,022p. The yield isn't fantastic, at 2.2%, and you aren't getting a bargain, at 14.7 times earnings, and naturally, there is no guarantee it will rise another 1,000% over the next 10 years. But if the latest bout of eurozone turmoil causes a market sell-off, you might want to rev up your engines.

ARM Holdings

In second place lies technology powerhouse ARM Holdings (LSE: ARM) (NASDAQ: ARMH.US), which has delivered a total return of 1,848% in the last 10 years. A decade ago, you could have picked it up for 50p, now it would cost you 939p. For me, ARM is the stock that got away. I briefly owned it three years ago, only to sell in a fit of impatience. It has quadrupled in value since then, as the smartphone chip pioneer rode the technology rollercoaster to fresh highs. Never go back, the saying goes, and on a mind-boggling price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 63 times earnings, I'm certainly not going to. But with forecast earnings per share (EPS) growth of 27% this year and next, and an operating margin of 36%, you may wish to try your ARM. Citibank is still keen, it has just upped its target price from 835p to 1070p, and rates this stock a buy. Credit Suisse and Goldman Sachs have target prices of 1,130p and 1,250p respectively. I can't go bear to go back. You might feel differently.

Aberdeen Asset Management

Third best-performing stock on the FTSE 100 over the past 10 years is Aberdeen Asset Management (LSE: ADN), up a stonking 1,780%. You might have thought all that market turbulence would have knocked a fund manager, but not a bit of it. A decade ago, it traded at 54p, now it costs 425p. Aberdeen has established itself as a renowned emerging markets specialist fund manager, building its reputation on the BRICs. The market loves the stock, and with good reason, although this leaves it trading at a pricey 17.4 times earnings, and a modest yield of 2.7%. I wouldn't buy at the price, with the recent bull run apparently slowing, but any eurozone-inspired market turbulence could throw up a great buying opportunity. If you are looking to invest safely in Beijing, Delhi, Moscow and Brasilia, you might want to start your journey in Aberdeen.

A thousand reasons to invest

There's a reason why the FTSE 100 has thrown up these impressive multi-baggers over the last 10 years. A decade ago, in the wake of the dotcom bust, the index had just bottomed out at 3,287 nearly half today's value. This reminds us of two very Foolish lessons. First, the best way to invest is to buy strong and solid companies when markets are down, investors are pessimistic, and stocks are going cheap. Second, ignore short-term volatility, reinvest those dividends, and be patient, you will get there in the end. The next 10 and 20 baggers are out there.

A strong and growing dividend, carefully reinvested, can also drive long-term growth. That's why Motley Fool analysts are getting excited about one of the best income stocks on the FTSE 100. To find out what the stock is, simply download our free guide "Power Up Your Portfolio". Don't hang about, download it now while it is still free and available.

> Harvey doesn't own any of the shares mentioned in this article.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

F958B 27 Feb 2013 , 1:16pm

How about a list of FTSE100 horror stories - not just the credit crunch but also going back to the dotcom failures.

Northern Rock? Bradford & Bingley? HBOS?
Baltimore Technologies? Psion? Marconi?

The FTSE has some great success stories, but also some great collapses.

.....and how about a list of promising FTSE250 companies poised for greatness and with great potential for promotion to the FTSE100 in the next decade?

TMFMarkRogers88 27 Feb 2013 , 2:55pm

F95 - I think the FTSE250 idea would be great. I see a lot more promise and safety in some of the 250 issues than many of mining giants currently occupying the FTSE100.

I often feel that the 250 is a much better representative of good UK businesses.

apprenticeDRL 27 Feb 2013 , 6:01pm

I will second that.

I would be very interested to see some analysis of good FTSE250 companies

ANuvver 27 Feb 2013 , 6:51pm

So would I, but I don't think MF moving outside the 100 would satisfy their hit-count objectives...

Mark:
The skew in the 100 you mention is the main reason I avoid basic trackers.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.