Which Bank Should I Buy?

Published in Investing on 7 February 2013

A Fool looks for value in Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc (LON:RBS), Lloyds Banking Group PLC (LON:LLOY) and Barclays PLC (LON:BARC).

Royal Bank of Scotland Group (LSE: RBS), Lloyds Banking Group (LSE: LLOY) (NYSE: LYG.US) and Barclays (LSE: BARC) (NYSE: BCS.US) had a terrific run last year. Shares in Lloyds rose by 85%, RBS gained 60% and Barclays managed a 49% increase.

After a performance like that, you might think it was too late to buy into the banking recovery, but I've recently been taking a closer look at the figures with a view to buying shares in one of these banks myself, and I think that one of them, in particular, still offers compelling value.

Banking value

Let's start with a look at some of the banks' key metrics:

CompanyRoyal Bank of ScotlandLloyds Banking GroupBarclays
Current share price*340p52p297p
Net tangible asset value per share**476p56.6p379p
Price-to-tangible book ratio (P/TB)0.710.920.78
Forward P/E ratio12.213.57.9
2013 forecast dividend yieldn/an/a2.7%

*Opening share price on 07/02/2013.

**Tangible asset value per share taken from Q3 2012 interim report from each bank.

The main value attraction is that all three banks have a P/TB ratio below 1 -- meaning that in theory, they would be worth more if they were liquidated than their current market value.

Healthy banks generally trade at or slightly above book value -- HSBC has a P/TB ratio of 1.2, for example -- so these banks' discounts represent an attractive value opportunity, if you believe they will eventually recover.

Although Lloyds and RBS don't currently pay dividends, both are keen to restart dividend payouts, and brokers' forecasts are pencilling in dividends from both banks this year. This would improve the potential returns from each bank, and would be likely to drive further share price growth, as it would encourage institutional investors to buy back into these stocks.

How reliable are these asset values?

It's important to remember that the main reason these banks are trading below their tangible asset value is that doubts remain over whether this value can ever be realised. The banks aren't out of the woods yet.

Over the last three years, all three banks have been forced to write down the value of some of their assets and sell others. During the first nine months of 2012 alone, all three reduced their estimate of net tangible asset per share:

CompanyNet tangible asset value per share 31/12/11Net tangible asset value per share 30/09/12Change (%)
Royal Bank of Scotland501p476p-5%
Lloyds Banking Group58.6p56.6p-3.4%
Barclays391p379p-3.1%

Legal dramas

Asset risk aside, these banks also face legal problems. On Tuesday, Barclays announced that it was increasing the amount of money it was setting aside to deal with claims relating to mis-sold interest rate hedging products by £400m, taking the total provision to £850m. At the same time, it said it was adding another £600m to the compensation pot for payment protection insurance (PPI) claims, taking that total to £2.6bn -- hardly business as usual.

Wednesday saw Royal Bank of Scotland in the spotlight once more, as it confirmed that it would pay £390m of fines to UK and US authorities to settle claims relating to Libor manipulation.

Lloyds is also heavily involved in the PPI scandal, and the banks may yet face further regulatory investigations into past misdeeds -- RBS, for example, faces charges of fixing Euribor and is involved in an investigation relating to money laundering in the US.

The bank I'd buy

The bank that attracts me the most is Barclays. Although it's had its fair share of legal and regulatory problems, it hasn't required a state bailout and doesn't face the prospect of further state intervention in its operation or management.

Barclays' discount to tangible book value is almost as large as that of RBS, and it didn't reduce its net tangible asset per share value as much as Lloyds or RBS in the first nine months of last year.

What's more, Barclays offers a 2.7% forward dividend yield, and its forward P/E of 7.9 is much lower than that of the other banks, making a near-term uprating of its share price more likely.

A better growth choice?

I believe that banking shares like Barclays have the potential to deliver significant growth as they recover. However, I understand that you may still be wary of investing in these banks -- because frankly, who knows what skeletons are still lurking in their cupboards?

Luckily, there are some strong contenders for growth shares outside the financial sector. I'd like to suggest you take a look at one UK stock that outperformed the FTSE 100 by 32% in 2012 and has delivered 44% earnings per share growth since 2009. It's already ahead of the wider market in 2013, too.

You can find full details of this company -- which the Fool's analysts believe could be seriously undervalued -- in this free report, "The Motley Fool's Top Growth Stock For 2013". Just click here to download your free copy now -- but hurry, it will only be available for a limited time.

> Roland owns shares in HSBC but does not own any of the other shares mentioned in this article.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

BigJC1 07 Feb 2013 , 4:05pm

RBS seems a bottomless pit of scandal, law breaking and disaster, some of it under the current management regime. So I've avoided them.

I do hold Barclays but I'm getting increasingly concerned. If Barclays is found to have made loans to buy it's own shares (as rumoured) then the repercussions could be enormous. If it did then it means whilst other banks took state aid Barclays simply broke the regulations to avoid becoming government owned.

Interesting that both the FD and Legal Counsel have both left recently, with both FSA and SFO probes ongoing the truth will eventually out.

Any views on the impact that this will have on the value ?

sopavest 07 Feb 2013 , 4:37pm

BigJC1,

I agree that the truth will eventually come out, and it probably won't be pretty. But I don't think that the underlying asset value should be affected too much by these events, as the markets are pretty cynical/realistic about these things.

All of the banks have proven that they can deal with fairly substantial fines without batting an eyelid, so my investment case is based on the bad news gradually fading and being replaced with 'banking as usual'. Time will tell, I guess...

Regards,

Roland (article author)

BigJC1 07 Feb 2013 , 5:11pm

Thanks, banking as usual would be nice !

vinchainsaw 07 Feb 2013 , 5:57pm

I'm looking quite hard at Investec.

Wealthy client base, nice emerging market exposure.

Was considering Barclays, but this latest scandal has the potential to be a biggie.

LastChip 07 Feb 2013 , 8:53pm

The bottom line is, investors are ruthless mercenary's, who couldn't care less about who broke what rule as long as the money keeps rolling in.

We live in a corrupt society all the way down from the politicians themselves. You've only to look at recent history for confirmation.

If you can't beat 'em, join 'em! Just make sure you're on the winning side.

jaizan 07 Feb 2013 , 11:18pm

I'm not buying into any of these banks.

That's an easy decision.

richjfool 08 Feb 2013 , 1:12am

The only bank I've bought and that was some time ago, was Standard Chartered.

ANuvver 08 Feb 2013 , 2:50pm

Aliciabot v. 2.3672:

You are not seeming exist on this site please other than making this fragrant insertion so urinating in non-specific direction would be at you from some other people who are being concern about business in lendingness.

Oddly enough, Bank of America might not be a bad idea for tip earn money by you.

CodeGimp 08 Feb 2013 , 4:24pm

Hmmm. RBS seems to have 10-bagged in the last year or so. Obviously a great investment!*

*Government health warning: Not a great investment

kuronagi 10 Feb 2013 , 9:04pm

Standard Chartered is the only bank I own (over 11 years now). I lost money on Lloyds and RBS and vowed I would never buy another bank again. Their financial statements are just too opaque.

Lloyds and RBS are substantially owned by the Government which will capture much of any upside.

Any investor buying any of the three banks covered in this article is a "punter" not an investor.

And why no mention of HSBC? After all, it is the UK's largest bank.

goodlifer 10 Feb 2013 , 9:26pm

kuronagi
"Any investor buying any of the three banks covered in this article is a "punter" not an investor."

Is this really true of BARC?

BigJC1 10 Feb 2013 , 9:57pm

kuronagi: I disagree, investing in Lloyds in the depths of it's troubles may have been seen to many as a punt but those people just failed to spot it's off balance sheet assets (and its on balance sheet cash reserves) - 30 million customers, over 1 million SME's, strong brands including Halifax, St James Place, Scottish Widows plus a tacit full guarantee by the UK Government (who I doubt will get a preferred share price as you assume).

Couple that with Lloyds/Halifax historic profitability record over the last 25 years and the fact that those 30 million customers still want mortgages, loans, ISA's, etc and just make a long term investment (dividend streams will be limited for the next 3 to 5 years) on the basis that you should be able to turn 24p into £2.40 or even todays 53p into £2.40.

Now Apple - there's a punt.


Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.