10 FTSE 100 Shares To Avoid Market Madness

Published in Investing on 21 January 2013

Statistics suggest that FTSE 100 companies like GlaxoSmithKline plc (LON:GSK) and National Grid plc (LON:NG) will avoid future volatility.

Some companies see their share price swing massively on modest market moves. Others seem immune to market panics or outbreaks of irrational exuberance. Stock market analysts have a statistical measure for this: the 'beta'. For example, a share with a beta of 1.2 is one that has previously been 20% more volatile than the markets.

By trawling the market for low-beta shares, we can find investments that have previously been less of a roller-coaster than the market in general.

CompanyBeta2013 P/E (forecast)2013 yield (%, forecast)Market cap (£m)
Severn Trent (LSE: SVT)0.1716.84.33,742
Randgold Resources0.2118.40.65,353
United Utilities0.3017.74.84,848
Reckitt Benckiser (LSE: RB)0.3516.73.129,623
National Grid (LSE: NG)0.3612.66.024,867
AstraZeneca0.377.96.038,303
Centrica0.3712.64.917,593
SSE0.3912.55.913,705
WM Morrison Supermarkets (LSE: MRW)0.399.54.66,089
GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK)0.4312.35.467,811

I've picked out five for further consideration.

Severn Trent

Severn Trent provides water and sewerage services to 4.2 million households and businesses in England and Wales. After the wettest year on record, water companies have plenty in stock. This will make their job far easier in 2013.

So far this year, Severn Trent shares have not joined the large rises many shares have enjoyed. In fact, the shares trade near their low for the year.

The forecast dividend rises that mean Severn Trent now looks a decent yield play. Although the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is high, investors expect to pay a premium for a company with such reliable earnings. Severn Trent is forecast to pay 75.8p of dividends for 2013, a record payout for the company.

National Grid

Since the beginning of 2013, the FTSE 100 has risen 4.3%. In the same period, shares in National Grid have fallen 2.8%.

There have been no material announcements from the company in that time. It is possible that the disparity in returns is simply market noise. However, I think something else could be at play.

As owner and operator of power and fuel infrastructure, National Grid is a non-discretionary supplier. It is a classic 'defensive' share: whatever is happening in the economy, its customers rarely cut back.

I think that in recent weeks, shares like National Grid have simply gone out of fashion. Investors have been rejecting solid, dependable shares like National Grid in the aim of making big gains on more speculative stocks. Good luck to sellers, but I think that National Grid shares are now very attractive.

GlaxoSmithKline

Pharmaceuticals giant Glaxo produces a range of drugs, from the family medicine cabinet variety to the HIV medicines it produces through its joint-venture with Pfizer. One of the company's biggest selling treatments is Seretide, a respiratory product that contributed £5bn to Glaxo's revenues in a single year.

Glaxo shares currently trade within 5% of their low for the year. At the same time, they are just 9% away from a five-year high. That shows how steady Glaxo shares are.

As governments tighten their belts, it is possible that global healthcare spending will coming under pressure. Perhaps for this reason, only slight earnings growth is expected from Glaxo for 2012 and 2013. The dividend is expected to rise comfortably ahead of inflation.

WM Morrison Supermarkets

If you like to buy shares when they are their cheapest ever, then take a look at Morrisons' today. With the shares at 253p, Morrisons has never traded on a higher dividend yield or a lower P/E.

Given that valuation, you would be forgiven for thinking that Morrisons was in serious trouble. Yet earnings and dividends are expected to increase for the next two years.

There are some concerns over Morrisons' current trading and its recent loss of market share. However, Morrisons still trades at a big discount to the average FTSE 100 stock -- and pays a better dividend.

If you wait for the company to announce a sustained improvement in trading, you will likely to be too late to buy the shares cheap.

Reckitt Benckiser

Reckitt Benckiser is one of those massive companies many people have never heard of. The company owns a collection of well-known household brands such as Harpic and Cillit Bang. For as long as people need clean, hygenic bathrooms and kitchens, Reckitt Benckiser will continue to make sales.

The non-discretionary nature of many Reckitt Benckiser products means that the company delivers a reliable stream of sales, profits and dividends.

In the last five years, the company has delivered compound average earnings growth of 18.1% per annum. In that time, the dividend has been increased at an average rate of 22.0% a year.

Unfortunately for Reckitt Benckiser shareholders, earnings are expected to plateau for 2012 and 2013. Dividend increases are forecast to continue at a rate approximately in-line with inflation.

Companies with strong brands are usually in a better negotiating position and can secure better prices. Billionaire investor Warren Buffett loves buying shares in strong brand companies. This man is probably the greatest living investor in the world today. Recently, Mr Buffett has been buying shares in a UK-listed company. To find out which one and the price he paid, get a copy of the free Motley Fool report "The One UK Share Warren Buffett Loves". Simply click here to start learning from this master investor today.

> David does not own shares in any of the companies above.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

anecdotage 21 Jan 2013 , 11:33am

Please tell me the P/E and Yield columns are the right way around. I'd love a portfolio with those figures!

SteveKzz 21 Jan 2013 , 11:35am

You've got the yield and P/E columns reversed in your table.

johnnygibber 21 Jan 2013 , 11:36am

Interesting article David - I think you got your column headings mixed up though.

A forecast yield of 18% + is enticing - especially for a gold producer :-)

Cheers
JG

TMFSamR 21 Jan 2013 , 11:36am

Good spot, anecdotage! Unfortunately, it was but an innocent mistake :-)

BarrenFluffit 21 Jan 2013 , 12:28pm

"National Grid is a non-discretionary supplier" ok but that doesn't mean demand can't fluctuate with trends in the economy. fewer high street shops mean less lights/heating. Less industrial / manufacturing process use, that kind of thing. So the balance between capacity costs and demand matters.

goodlifer 21 Jan 2013 , 8:50pm

"Statistics suggest that FTSE 100 companies like ... will avoid future volatility."

What's so wrong with volatility?
Unless of course you think saying, "This share is volatile, " is just a polite way of saying it's no good to man or beast.

But if it does happen to be any good, surely the more volatile it is the better the chance of buying it cheap and selling it dear?

F958B 22 Jan 2013 , 2:00pm

Generally speaking, the more volatile (higher Beta) the share, the more erratic or prone to the economic cycle its earnings tend to be.

These "cyclical" swings in revenues can put the company finances under stress and result in cuts or cancellations to dividend payments or even the company finding itself dangerously overindebted in a downturn.

High Beta does well when times are good. It does badly when times are bad.
There is also strong evidence that smaller private investors' greed causes them to pick higher Beta in the hope of making a big gain, but this leaves high-Beta regularly overpriced so that in the long term, low Beta often comes out on top.
Hence the long term success of Buffett and Woodford.

ANuvver 22 Jan 2013 , 6:14pm

"Good spot"?
Sorry, no. Picking up on a basic production error.

goodlifer 22 Jan 2013 , 10:28pm

F958B
"High Beta... does badly when times are bad."

Isn't that when you should be buying?

F958B 23 Jan 2013 , 12:01am

goodlifer

Yes.

But...

The problem is that as a downturn gathers pace, some high-beta companies will go out of business.
Others will be seriously damaged and take years to recover (or suffer a lingering death like HMV).

Due to sensitivity to the economic cycle, high beta often have to cut or cancel dividends when the economy hits a rough patch. Erratic dividend payouts are not entirely suitable for those seeking a reliable income stream.
So only really suitable for capital gains chasers who can time their entry and exits.

Over very long periods of time, most private investors (especially the buy-and-hold type) are likely to do better by avoiding companies with particularly high beta. This being because usually greed causes them to buy high beta at the top of the market, and panic causes tem to cut their losses at the bottom of the market.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.