The Hidden Peril In Supermarkets' Christmas Results

Published in Investing on 15 January 2013

Investors in Tesco Plc (LON:TSCO), J Sainsbury plc (LON:SBRY) and Wm. Morrison Supermarkets plc (LON:MRW) should take care.

Tesco (LSE: TSCO) (NASDAQOTH: TSCDY.US), which reported its Christmas period trading last week, is my biggest holding. I've also got decent slug of J. Sainsbury (LSE: SBRY) and Marks & Spencer (LSE: MKS).

But should the market -- as I expect -- turn down with a reasonable correction in the weeks or months ahead, then I plan on buying a decent-sized holding in Morrisons (LSE: MRW), which is presently trading close to a 52-week low.

The logic isn't difficult to see: Morrisons is on a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio than any of them, offers a better prospective yield than Tesco and Marks & Spencer, and has a lot of potential upside if the business can get to grips with convenience stores and online shopping.

Relevance lost

One piece of information I'm not factoring into my calculations, though, is the most recent batch of Christmas trading updates.

For some reason, pundits seize on these each year -- perhaps because there's not much else around by way of market news -- and then make all sorts of pronouncements based on the picture that they see in the entrails.

Is that rational? Or even vaguely sensible? Let's review the facts.

  • The three months in question are skewed by the sale of highly seasonal and atypical items: turkeys, booze, festive goods and gifts.
  • Analysts, as with this year's results from Tesco, often seize most on the immediate run-up to Christmas -- a six-week period, which the stores obligingly break out for them.
  • Generally, the companies are quoting sales figures, not profit figures. So a company that discounts heavily does well in sales terms, and a company that doesn't, doesn't. Yet the picture with respect to profits may be the reverse.

Sell! Sell!

Last year's results from Tesco were a case in point. Widely billed as a profit warning (although they weren't), the results acknowledged some deficiencies in the core UK business, and management announced a plan to correct them.

Joe Public and headstrong fund managers promptly piled out of the shares, probably nursing losses if their initial purchase of Tesco shares had been since the market's nadir in early 2009.

But Warren Buffett promptly piled in to take his stake in the company to over 5%. I tripled my own holding. And today, 12 months on, the share price is back to where it was in the first place. Did those investors who sold out think they did the right thing? If that's you, then answers in the box below, please.

Buying opportunity

Neil Woodford, it's fair to say, was one of the sellers. But it's also fair to say that he's playing a different game from Buffett. Woodford is an income investor, responding to demands from his shareholders for a reliable stream of growing dividends.

And whatever else it delivered, Tesco management's turnround plan for the UK business was going to deliver minimal, if any, dividend growth for the next year. So who can blame Woodford if he saw better dividend growth prospects elsewhere?

Yet for investors with a longer-term horizon, and less focused on income -- Berkshire Hathaway doesn't pay a dividend, remember -- the result was a buying opportunity, courtesy of a market over-reaction to those Christmas trading results.

The Woodford factor

That said, it would be a mistake to discount Neil Woodford's long-term total return performance, despite his focus on income. On a dividend re‑invested basis over the 15 years to 31 December 2011, he's delivered a return of 347%, versus the FTSE All-Share's distinctly more modest 42% performance.

Not surprisingly, with a track record like that, he looks after two of the country's largest investment funds, and runs more money for private investors than any other City manager. What's his investing style? And which are his largest holdings? All is revealed in free special report from The Motley Fool: "8 Shares Held By Britain's Super Investor".

Download the report -- which profiles no fewer eight of his largest holdings -- and see for yourself the shares that are powering his portfolio, as well as the investing logic behind them. It's free, and can be in your in-box in seconds. So what have you got to lose? Click here.

> Malcolm owns shares in Tesco, Sainsbury, and Marks & Spencer. The Motley Fool owns shares in Tesco.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

ProfessorMarcus 15 Jan 2013 , 2:00pm

Hello Malcolm.

So the hidden peril is that profit figures may be lower than expected?

And that figures have been skewed by seasonal factors?

Half of the article is making references to Woodford who only holds a small amount of MRW.

Cheers.

MDW1954 15 Jan 2013 , 2:10pm

ProfessorMarcus,

No: the hidden peril is that investors can be tempted to make wealth-sapping decisions on limited data, and atypical data.

Malcolm (author)

ProfessorMarcus 15 Jan 2013 , 2:23pm

Hello Malcolm.

What is the alternative for the average DIY investor?

And do Warren Buffett and Woodford have more of an advantage than us? They obviously have teams of analysts working for them, and contacts at various companies. But at the end of the day can the figures be over-analysed?

A long-term investor may as well buy equal holdings in all 3 of the major UK supermarkets and collect the dividends. Is there much chance of one of them going bust?

MDW1954 15 Jan 2013 , 2:28pm

ProfessorMarcus,

I'm prepared to attach a lot more weight to a year's results than I am to six weeks' results. Particularly when those six weeks are fairly unrepresentative of demand during the rest of the year.

So yes, such results can be over-analysed. And obviously are. But not by me, I'm happy to say.

Malcolm (author)

BigJC1 15 Jan 2013 , 2:32pm

I agree that market reaction towards Tesco last year had little real justification particularly as Tesco is increasingly a global supermarket.

However, doesn't that just give all us contrarians a field day as the likes of Woodford lead the rest of the lemmings over the cliff edge.

I stood back and thought Tesco was a great business in December 2011 and its still a great business in January 2012 so thank you very much mister market I'll top up now.

So perhaps you should say the Hidden Opportunity in Christmas results.

vinchainsaw 15 Jan 2013 , 2:43pm

I was ecstatically happy that the market over-reacted to tesco's xmas trading last year - if it wasnt for that I'd never have gotten in!

MDW1954 15 Jan 2013 , 2:55pm

BigJC1,

Hidden opportunity? Indeed. And yes, I topped up in January at 314p, and again in June at 298p.

But for every buyer, there's a seller -- and they'll be the people that panicked following the Xmas results.

Malcolm

farmboy104 15 Jan 2013 , 7:11pm

who wins from morrisons share buy back policy rayher than investment or debt reduction

theredflag 16 Jan 2013 , 7:03am

farmboy104,

It could be argued the shareholders do!

Each share they own now represents a bigger slice of the assets, profits and dividends the company generates. This is achieved in a tax efficient way. If you think the share price is good value (I do for MRW at present, and aim to add more especially if it dips further) then buybacks can be a good idea.

There is of course an opportunity cost (less cash for MRW to invest/expand etc), but this is true for all shareholder returns e.g. dividends.

corrsfan 16 Jan 2013 , 10:09pm

I sometimes think the tesco metros etc its not so much about being a shop, but more about getting its name out there,so that you will go to the big stores for the weekly shopping, a functional advert if you will.

i wonder how much these actually waste in food (and thus profits) though. every example Ive seen always seems to have a fair bit of fresh bread/etc about to go out of date, usually cus theres a better greengrocers locally too.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.