3 Easy Ways To Earn A Passive Income From The FTSE 100

Published in Investing on 11 January 2013

Sit back and collect regular cash from the FTSE 100 index with little or no effort.

I'm sure you, like me, are attracted to the concept of 'passive income' -- essentially receiving regular cash for little or no effort.

In my view, there's no better way of creating a respectable passive income than by investing in the stock market. Essentially, you buy some shares and sit back as you collect the dividends they pay... and hopefully watch your capital grow as well.

(That said, all stock-market investment comes with risk, and the price and income from any investment can fall as well as rise. If you can't risk your capital or income ever falling in value, shares are not for you!)

Here's how to put the theory into practice, with three easy ways to earn a passive income from the FTSE 100 (the benchmark index that represents the 100 largest companies trading on the London market).

1. Trackers and exchange-traded funds

Method 1 is to simply follow the FTSE 100 (UKX) via a cheap index tracker. No need to buy a basket of individual shares here -- you just buy a single fund where the underlying portfolio is invested in all the shares that are members of the FTSE 100 index.

One option is the iShares FTSE 100 (LSE: ISF), which is an exchange-traded fund (ETFs) that can be bought and sold just like an ordinary share and whose price tracks the FTSE 100 index up and down.

During the last 12 months, this iShares FTSE 100 fund has accumulated cash from major companies such as Royal Dutch Shell and GlaxoSmithKline, and in turn paid out dividends totalling 20.27p per share. You can buy the iShares FTSE 100 share today for about 609p, thereby giving you a potential passive income of 3.3% a year.

2. Employ an expert manager to create your passive income

Of course, you may wish to back an expert who could deliver a passive income that's greater than what you can enjoy from the wider FTSE 100.

One particular expert of note is Neil Woodford, who works for fund manager Invesco Perpetual and controls two of the country's largest dividend funds. If you ask me, Mr Woodford is best-choice investor around for ordinary people wishing to let somebody else do their income investing for them.

As this article shows, the dividend growth and capital performance from Mr Woodford's portfolios have trounced that of the FTSE 100 during the last 10 years or so. Mr Woodford invests mostly in FTSE 100 companies, and his current favourites include AstraZeneca and Imperial Tobacco.

One way of allowing Mr Woodford to create a passive income for you is through Edinburgh Investment Trust (LSE: EDIN). Similar to that iShares ETF, this investment trust can be bought and sold like an ordinary share, but here the fund's underlying portfolio contains the FTSE 100 shares picked by Mr Woodford himself.

Last year, Mr Woodford's Edinburgh trust paid dividends of 22p per share and the price today is 516p. So you could earn a 4.3% annual passive income from Mr Woodford, assuming the trust's payout is maintained.

3. Do it yourself and create your own passive income from shares

Finally, you can always create your own passive income by acquiring a good spread of hand-picked dividend shares yourself!

True, this may take more nerve and a bit more skill than buying a FTSE 100 ETF or selecting a talented fund manager to create your passive income for you.

But the DIY passive-income rewards could be greater than going down either the tracker or expert route. Indeed, here are five household-name members of the FTSE 100 that currently combine to deliver a potential 5.5% passive income a year:

SharePriceAnnual dividend per shareYield
Admiral1,197p81.6p6.8%
BAE Systems350p19.1p5.5%
BP461p20.9p4.5%
J Sainsbury327p16.4p5.0%
National Grid689p39.8p5.8%
    
Average  5.5%

Of course, owning five shares won't provide you with the same diversification as owning all 100 names within the FTSE 100 or the dozens contained in Mr Woodford's fund.

However, this free report from the Motley Fool does reveal several more FTSE 100 stocks that offer dividend yields in excess of the wider FTSE 100 average. Similar to those in the above list, these particular names are also prominent British businesses that have proved themselves to passive-income investors over many years.

You can download this special dividend report to help build your passive income portfolio by just clicking here (the report is free and comes with no further obligation).

Plus, if you are new to the stock market, the Motley Fool has also published a free report that provides a good introduction to shares in general. You can read that report immediately by clicking here (this report is free, too).

Little or no effort

As I wrote at the start, I'm attracted to the concept of 'passive income' -- essentially, receiving regular cash for little or no effort.

In my experience, backing some of Britain's greatest companies -- and collecting a slice of their profits every year through dividends -- is, I feel, one of the more achievable and reliable sources of passive incomes right now.

Let me finish by wishing you the best of luck if you are taking the plunge with shares and building your own a passive income!

> Maynard does not own any share mentioned in this article.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

AleisterCrowley 11 Jan 2013 , 11:09am

How about the SPDR UK Dividend Aristocrats ETF (UKDV)?
Low TER (0.3% when I looked) and a 'sensible' selection policy.

goodlifer 11 Jan 2013 , 11:46am

SHRS have been pretty good to me over the years, but they're a bit pricey now.

jaizan 11 Jan 2013 , 3:49pm

On balance, I would usually prefer to pay a IT manager with a long term track record of performance, rather than tolerate the lack of transparency with some ETFs.

AleisterCrowley 11 Jan 2013 , 4:03pm

It's a generally accepted 'fact' that past performance is not a good predictor of future performance when looking at managed funds

I'm on the fence...

ANuvver 11 Jan 2013 , 5:18pm

Tracker ETFs are great tools, but have drawbacks:
a) they have the built-in bias of the index they track - eg: if you don't fancy the prospects for financials or big oil, don't track the 100.
b) bond ETFs follow sentiment - you do not get the same capital security as you would by holding the underlying assets to maturity.
c) replication methods and counterparty risk.
d) if you pick too many ETFs by off-the-peg themes, you still wind up with duplication.

You have to decide whether you're fine with that.

Personally, I'm happier doing my own picking, timing and weighting of 10-20 major components. Then taking the odd position where I feel I have a good idea. And filling in asset allocation gaps with ETFs in areas where I don't have the time or experience to judge. I treat ETFs as outsourcing.

Incidentally, I've noticed that a certain tabloid investment website (no names, no mail) tends to present decent articles, then punt managed funds in the copy like mad.

I don't check this particular site daily, but it's interesting that whenever I've popped in to suggest the use of passive ETFs, my comments don't seem to make it through. Makes me wonder whether certain media organs are going to be the tougher nut to crack in terms of RDR reform and "reserved" status, or whatever they've decided to call it.

I'm actually a big fan of ETFs. It's perfectly feasible to plan your financial future around maybe five or six of them, max, then go out and get on with your life.

AleisterCrowley 11 Jan 2013 , 5:27pm

a) is a drawback of the FTSE100 rather than ETFs, but I see what you mean.
Re b)- I recall you can't hold shorter bonds in an ISA? >Five years ?

then go out and get on with your life.

Good plan, you only get the one, and the pubs are open

jaizan 11 Jan 2013 , 8:19pm

As Seth Klarman says, if everyone held index funds, the market would be totally inefficient as there would be nothing to move prices.

As for fund track records, I figure short term records count for nothing, but if the fund has a long term record of outperforming it's (relevant) benchmark index and the same manager is in charge, that's the fund* I will pick. So far it's working well for me.
(*Usually an Investment Trust, not a fund in my case)

MDW1954 11 Jan 2013 , 10:15pm

@Annuver:

Ditto. Although they also do more than most to publicise ITs, for which I can forgive them a lot.

Malcolm Wheatley

ANuvver 12 Jan 2013 , 1:10pm

GreatBeast:

Your point about bond maturities in an ISA is correct. Traditional wisdom (ho-ho) is that you should stuff your ISA with bonds so that the distributions are ring-fenced from the rest of your income. But denying you the short end of the yield curve is essentially another prong to financial repression, imv. Scare retail investors into bonds, but don't let them near the stuff that might upset the yield curve.

There's probably an almighty admin headache brewing about what to do when ISA-wrapped bond holdings fall over into the 5-year maturity limit. Can that point be tracked automatically? Forced sale by the provider? Or are you liable for penalty if you fail to track it yourself and act accordingly? - all of which rather goes against the basic concept of "what goes on in an ISA (rather like Las Vegas) stays in an ISA".

ISAs are such wrinkly things. One of my favourite cuteys is that, while you're allowed to hold foreign-denominated assets, income and sales proceeds get crashed unceremoniously into sterling at Dick Turpin FX spreads. Another is that while most longer-dated debt instruments are eligible, ISA providers can be mighty choosy about the range they'll offer. (DIYIncome - may his tribe increase - might care to come in this topic.)

Oh, and you're not supposed to hold "significant" cash balances in an SS ISA for more than a "reasonable" amount of time. Has anyone ever heard of this being enforced? The common-sense view seems to prevail - if you want to leave cash to sit there gathering mushrooms at negative real return, it's your own lookout.

But if anyone has received an e-Plod message along the lines of: "About time you put some of that cash to work, you naughty little herbert, you" I'd love to hear about it.

ANuvver 12 Jan 2013 , 1:33pm

Malcolm:

Can't for the life of me imagine which site you're talking about!

I foresee a time soon, where most people will visit (maybe even govt sponsored) websites to lead them through a certified questionnaire about goals, time horizons, risk appetite, perhaps even inclination towards certain themes - regional, demographic, whatever. This is essentially just what IFAs do anyway.

Then it'll spit out a generically themed asset allocation plan, with caveat emptor written all over it. The ETF suppliers will swarm the place for advertising. The financial management industry has muscle to be sure, but there's no reason it shouldn't go the way of so many others under the onslaught of the internet and a desire for consumers to cut costs.

Actually, we're already part the way there, really. The rest is streamlining and marketing. I would expect the likes of iShares and HSBC to lead the way.

And I'd also expect a bit of serious consideration of the impact of RDR hereabouts?

Best, J

MDW1954 12 Jan 2013 , 5:43pm

@ANuvver,

Fool content is now strongly ticker-related, as the distribution medium (apart from here) is search engines and the like.

It's not that RDR isn't important any longer, it's that it's outside that ticker-led focus.

But there's been plenty of coverage elsewhere, including that site we were talking about. (And, as it happens, I tend to agree with their stance.)

Malcolm

torata 13 Jan 2013 , 5:31am

ANuvver: "...what to do when ISA-wrapped bond holdings fall over into the 5-year maturity limit"

AFAIK this only applies to when you buy them.
I've held individual bonds to maturity in an ISA and it wasn't an issue.
I've also sold bonds due to mature within 5 years in an ISA. That required a call to my self-selct ISA provider because I couldn't sell them on-line on their system (they had been 'tagged' somehow), but again it wasn't an issue.

ANuvver 14 Jan 2013 , 11:56am

torata:

Thanks for that. Interesting that the sale couldn't be done online. That might indicate an admin issue for the provider, which could be why the choice they offer can be rather limited.

davelewis1 14 Jan 2013 , 12:33pm

I read this site about once a week if I'm lucky, I have shares in GSK, BP, DGE, AZN, TSCO, LLYDS, HSBC, BT, BAE, VOD, DGO, BLND - all picked on a whim or 'cos I read something here. As I know absolutely nothing about shares I wanted to be sure (as I can) that I had a diverse set of industries, plus I have a dividend paid out to me every month of the year. I'm almost there. My plan was to buy £1000 of each share. I'm not rich and buy when I get a special offer rate and I buy in £100 or £200 lots each month I can afford some. My long term plan is to build up 10-15 companies and have a few grand in each. It won't make me rich as I don't earn enough in the first place to invest more but... fingers crossed in the long term, 10yrs + I will have more money than I started with.

What does amaze me though is all these so called experts saying buy this or that share and then at the bottom it says they don't actually have any themselves!!! In those cases I never believe aword they say.

davelewis1 14 Jan 2013 , 12:36pm

I also have RB, AVIVA and UNLVR, forgot about those ;)

GoldenSoldier 14 Jan 2013 , 1:19pm

Davelewis1

Yes, I am influenced by articles written by Maynard. I don’t regard him as “a so called expert“ but I am puzzled why he does not own any of those 5 shares he lists.

GS

jaizan 14 Jan 2013 , 9:54pm

TD Direct have FX rates that resemble Dick Turpin, with 2% spread each way.
They do allow the investor to move money into a foreign currency and keep it there, but they apply another scam to that -basically the investor is only allowed to invest 90% of his foreign exchange, in case of currency fluctuations.
How ridiculous. If the 10% "fluctuation risk" is within the investor credit limit or less than the other assets in the portfolio, there is no logical reason to apply a 90% rule.
I need a better broker.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.