Beginners' Portfolio: Don't Overanalyse!

Published in Investing on 24 December 2012

Don't get confused by all those numbers.

This article is the latest in a series that aims to help novice investors with the stock market. To enjoy past articles in the series, please visit our full archive.

When I've chosen shares for the portfolio or for the watchlist, I've often mentioned a share's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. I tend to look at dividends a lot as well, and I keep an eye on debt. But other than that, I don't dig too much into figures -- largely because I think it's likely to be too confusing for beginners.

People will pay more for a share that they think will bring in greater future earnings. So, if a company has been growing its earnings averagely, then a P/E close to the FTSE average of 14 won't be far from a fair long-term valuation (other things being average, too). But if a similar company is growing its earnings faster, then a fair P/E valuation would be higher.

Growth = high P/E

Forecasts suggest a fall in earnings this year of 7% for Tesco (LSE: TSCO), with a rebound next year of 5%. We would, therefore expect Tesco shares to be on a lower-than-average P/E, and that is what we find -- the shares on on a forward P/E (that is, based on forecasts) of 10.5 for this year, falling to 10 next.

Compare with Blinkx (LSE: BLNX), and you'll see a P/E of 30 for the year to March 2013, which is over twice the FTSE average. The reason is that Blinkx is still a small company, just getting its technology accepted -- and if it should become a de facto standard in the world of video advertising, potential future growth could be enormous. In fact, analysts are predicting an 85% growth in earnings for the following year, which would bring the P/E down to around 16.

Dividends = cash

Dividend is important for me, too, because cash is really what we want in the end, and I look for companies paying above their long-term average and towards the top end of their sector. Tesco's dividend yield is likely to be around 4.5%, which I think is very good for such a low-risk business, and that's part of the reason I think Tesco is undervalued.

Vodafone (LSE: VOD) has a modest 4% growth in earnings forecast for this year and next, but there's a dividend yield of nearly 7% forecast. To me that suggests the shares are undervalued, and I expect a price rise. But even if that doesn't happen, I'll be happy to keep taking 7% a year! There's a risk of a dividend being cut if the company can't sufficiently cover it with earnings, but I don't thank that's a big risk with Vodafone, which seems to be committed to raising shareholder value -- it's spending oodles of cash on share buybacks.

Watch that debt

Debt is important as well, and if a lot of cash is going in repayments then the portion left for shareholders is at greater risk. Should business falter, the same repayments still need to be made, leaving proportionally less for things like dividends. We saw a lot of overstretched companies suffer exactly that fate during the recession.

If a company has a sizable amount of debt, I want to see dependable income. United Utilities (LSE: UU), which we have in our watchlist, has an annual turnover of around £1.5 billion, but debts of more than £5 billion! But the utilities companies really do have a captive market with pretty much guaranteed prices -- water and energy are not luxury items that people can do without.

Keep in simple

That's a brief overview of my "Don't Overanalyse" approach -- I leave the detailed poring over reports to the guys at Share Advisor and Champion Shares Pro.

When you're starting out, if you stick to good solid companies that look undervalued on a combination of P/E and dividend and don't have too much debt, the chances are you'll do pretty well. You'll learn more about detailed analysis with experience, but you can't afford to wait -- you don't want to miss those all-important first years of investing.

And finally...

I recommend the Fool report "10 Steps To Making A Million In The Market". One thing it makes clear is that making a million is not reliant on hitting a magic share that zooms from nothing to riches overnight, but it can be done with just the kind of shares we have in our Beginners' Portfolio -- plus the magic ingredients of time and patience.

Many people think the idea of making a million is just a pipe dream. If you think that, click here for a copy and see if it changes your mind -- it will cost you nothing.

> Alan does not own any shares mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool owns shares in Tesco, and has recommended shares in Vodafone.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

goodlifer 24 Dec 2012 , 11:28pm

"Don't Overanalyse!"

Music to my ears - and to those of anyone else who's turned off by the way accountants talk to each other in their own private language, and never use one word where forty five will do.

I'm trying to build up a reasonably diversified portfolio of blue or bluish chips, and IMO only three numbers really matter: what I pay for it, what I get for it and the dividends.

I don't like to pay more for a share than about ten times earnings.
Obviously that's not the only item on my checklist, but it's one of the most important.
More than about twelve times is a stupidly unnecessary gamble.

Of course you may actually like gambling, in which case I can only wish you the best of luck - from a long, long way away!

What I get for it.
I never like to sell unless I think there's somewhere more sensible to put my money,
Even so you can overdo the tinkering, the churning or what you care to call it.
So I don't sell unless the profit is £1200 or more,.
In which case I sell either the original investment, or the profit (for instant reivestment)
In either case I've got myself with a worthwhile holding for free.

The dividends I always take in cash and lump them together to carefully make a buy each month.

"You'll learn more about detailed analysis with experience."

I doubt it - not everybody has a nose for that kind of thing.

UncleEbenezer 25 Dec 2012 , 1:29pm

Perhaps with big caps you should almost say, don't analyse at all, unless you have specialist knowledge in the company's business!

After all, the market prices are set by big players with overpaid professional analysts. To do any better than buy-and-hold, your analysis has to be better than theirs, yesno?

goodlifer 27 Dec 2012 , 9:43pm

"In which case I sell ... the profit (for instant reinvestment)"

As it happened, the market seemed so toppy this morning I decided to take some profit.
So I cashed in just the paper profit - not the whole holding - of my RIO, SHRS, RIO and AV.

Consequently I've added MRW and GLEN to my portfolio, together with a bit more BP and VOD.

Sensible opportunism?
Or mindless tinkering?

ANuvver 30 Dec 2012 , 6:27am

goodlifer:

I thought you never looked at prices?
Just ragging you...

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.