Are The Banks Uninvestable?

Published in Investing on 5 December 2012

A possible opportunity for contrarians.

Are the banks uninvestable? That's what the Association of British Insurers (ABI) -- the body that represents most institutional investors in the UK -- has suggested. In evidence last month to the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards, it said institutions were reluctant to invest because of increasing risks and shrinking returns.

Then last week, the British Bankers' Association's CEO repeated the charge on Radio 4's Today programme. What's this, the banks' own lobby group drawing attention to the undesirability of its equity? Something strange is going on, especially when set against the positive performance of bank shares this year.

War of words

It's part of the war of words with the Bank of England and its hawkish governor Sir Mervyn King. The banks, and institutional investors, see undue meddling by the regulators and think the sector should be left to get on with the job of repairing balance sheets and resuming normal commercial operations.

But what really gets their goat is Sir Mervyn King's agenda to force banks to raise more capital. That could dilute existing investors and reduce returns on equity.

Stability

For its part, the Bank of England is concerned about financial stability. First and foremost, it doesn't trust banks' balance sheets:

  • It thinks banks have under-provided against potential bad debts, recording the full value of loans to 'zombie' companies, individual mortgage-holders and commercial property landlords that they know are unlikely to be repaid in full;
  • It dislikes that International Accounting Standards preclude banks from making general provisions against possible future bad debts;
  • It distrusts banks' assessment of the capital required to support risk-weighted assets, which larger banks are allowed to measure using their own models;
  • It is suspicious that UK banks have provided less against periphery eurozone loans than domestic lenders have;
  • It thinks banks have underestimated the costs of PPI mis-selling and other scandals.

The Bank estimated that the sector may have to raise £20bn to £50bn of new capital, and set itself the task of assessing individual bank's requirements by next March.

George Osborne to the rescue

Help for the banks has come from an unlikely quarter. George Osborne's surprise appointment of Mark Carney as Governor of the Bank of England from next July has given the City hope that it will be overseen by someone who puts more emphasis on stimulating economic growth than the current incumbent.

More immediately, the Treasury has made it clear that it will not subscribe new equity for Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS) (NYSE: RBS.US) or Lloyds Banking (LSE: LLOY) (NYSE: LYG.US). That saves equity investors from the threat of dilution.

Instead, the Bank of England now expects banks to shrink assets and/or raise capital other than equity. However, either would still reduce returns to shareholders.

Bonds

Barclays (LSE: BARC) has already responded with an innovative £3bn bond issue enthusiastically taken up by Asian and US investors. It pays a coupon of 7.6%, but gets wiped out if the bank's tier 1 capital ratio falls below 7%. Thus it counts as tier 1 capital.

If the banks do anything well, it's imitating each other. So with the issue four times oversubscribed, it is likely we will see similar issues from other banks.

RBS and Lloyds continue to shrink their balance sheets. RBS is fighting pressure to sell its US retail bank, and is likely to cut back capital intensive parts of its investment bank instead. Lloyds is pressing ahead with the sale of 632 branches to Co-op Bank, hopefully more successfully than RBS's aborted sale to Santander.

Performance

Lloyds has been the leader in the banks' performance table this year. It shares are up 78%, followed by RBS at 46% and Barclays at 39%.

Bank shares have done well as concerns over the eurozone ease, and as their operating performance on an underlying basis has improved. Though one-off charges obscure the accounts, it looks as if they may have turned the corner.

If the institutions and banks are successful in their lobbying, then they may also succeed in making the sector 'investable' in their own terms. But the dangers in the eurozone and potential contagion in the banking system makes this still a high-risk sector.

If this prompts you to be one step ahead of the institutions and consider banking shares for 2013, then this free Motley Fool report could help you.

The report explains how taking a contrarian view and backing unloved companies can be vital steps on the path to becoming rich from shares. You never know, bank stocks might begin a strong turnaround next year that could transform your wealth.

Just click here to download the Fool's 'Millionaire' report today. But do hurry, as all Fool reports are free for a limited time only.

> Tony does not own any shares mentioned in this article.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

BigJC1 05 Dec 2012 , 1:07pm

Good article, some institutions are also precluded from investing until dividend streams come back on tap. Once that happens then the likes of Lloyds and RBS should leap again.

It would be useful to have an article that tracks revenues,core profits and Net Assets at the major banks for 2007 -2012 so we can see the underlying trends.

goodlifer 05 Dec 2012 , 1:44pm

It's probably too late now - some banks were a pretty good buy a few months ago.

F958B 05 Dec 2012 , 8:33pm

Hi goodlifer

Banks were a good buy? On what measure?

Capital gains (looking to sell to a greater fool at a higher price)?

- or -

Substantial dividend yield and the resilience to keep the dividend flowing over the long-term, through good times and bad?

->
The latter is a far more important consideration than the former because dividends are the closest thing to certainty that an investor will get.

Sadly, financials have shown repeatedly that, in general, they are not reliable. They do, however, present great opportunities for speculators - especially speculators with inside knowledge (which I don't have!).

goodlifer 06 Dec 2012 , 1:07am

Hi F958B
"Banks were a good buy? On what measure?"
Capital gains or dividend yield?
Bit of both.

I've only really been interested in BARC, for all the wrong reasons.

First, I'd never touch a Bank in hock to the government.
Second, I've never liked the smell of HSBC, don't ask me why.
Third, I've banked with Barclays, in sunshine and in shower, for more than 65 years.
No real complaints, and though I mostly operate online these days, whenever I go into the branch everything seems humming and happy.

I know such things aren't supposed to count with serious investors, but we can't help being just a little bit human every now and then.

Anyway I bought some at around 150 soon after they reinstated their dividend.
They went up so quick, I decided to take a profit.
I was just beginning to regret this when Bob Diamond hit the headlines, so I was able to creep back in again.

Very tempting to try the game again.

But the numbers are so attractive - PER less than 8, yield about 2.5%, divvy covered more than 4 times - I think I'm going to hold.

It might be worth buying some more, but I'm not pushing my luck.
Because of course it might not be.

That's why we diversify.

Prof103 06 Dec 2012 , 4:47pm

"It's probably too late now - some banks were a pretty good buy a few months ago."

True. The banks have been very volatile since the 2009 crash. So one could take a more speculative attitude and buy on the dips following some Euro bad news say that the banks were particularly sensitive to what with low trading volumes etc, and later sell on the rebound. I may have been lucky but I know one or two other persons who did the same quite profitably. Not everyone's style I know. Currently sold out of banks but would buy in should an appreciable price drop ensue. I would not hold though for the long term.

P103

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.