10 Shares To Avoid Market Chaos

Published in Investing on 24 September 2012

Mr Market is a manic depressive. Yet statistics reveal these stocks are the ones most resistant to market swings.

It is frustrating when the market falls, taking all your shares with it. If market movements are having a massive effect on your portfolio, it may be time you picked up some low-beta shares.

The 'beta' is a statistical measure of how a company's share price has moved, relative to the rest of the market. A company with a beta less than 1 has been found to move less than the market. This is typically because low-beta shares are considered less risky. Often, they are reliable and predictable businesses. This means that investors are less likely to believe economic or market developments will have a significant impact on long-term earnings.

I've used market statistics to find the largest companies with a beta less than 0.8. There are some familiar names here for defensive/income investors.

CompanyBetaP/E (forecast)Yield (forecast, %)Market cap (£m)
Vodafone (LSE: VOD)0.611.27.6*87,853
Royal Dutch Shell (LSE: RDSB)0.78.54.981,773
GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK)0.412.45.270,557
British American Tobacco (LSE: BATS)0.515.44.262,521
Diageo (LSE: DGE)0.616.82.843,176
BG (LSE: BG)0.714.71.342,326
AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN)0.47.96.136,822
Unilever (LSE: ULVR)0.618.23.429,417
Tesco (LSE: TSCO)0.710.14.427,334
Reckitt Benckiser (LSE: RB)0.414.63.626,024

* is an average of opinions on whether the special dividend will be paid again

I've picked four of these out as particularly interesting.

1) Vodafone

Anyone that thinks of Vodafone as a utility stock needs to see the company's most recent trading statement. Revenues were hit by a cut in termination rates (the price Vodafone can charge another network to call a Vodafone handset). Sales declined 7.7% in Italy and fell 10% in Spain.

These figures suggest that Vodafone's long-term earnings are not exactly copper-bottomed.

However, the dividend situation at Vodafone offers real hope. There remains a significant possibility that Vodafone will pay a special dividend again this year. Better still, this dividend could continue to recur.

Even without the special dividend, Vodafone is a great income stock. On last year's payout of 9.52p, the shares carry a 5.3% yield. If shareholders get the same special dividend again this year, that yield hits 7.6%.

The consensus forecast is for an 18.2% decline in earnings for 2013. Modest earnings growth is expected to return the year after.

2) Diageo

As owner of a portfolio of world-class alcoholic beverage brands, Diageo is a true market leader.

With a dividend that has increased every year since 1998, Diageo has long been popular with income investors. Today, however, the shares trade at an all-time high. This rise has had the effect of pushing down Diageo's dividend yield. Even though a 10.5% dividend rise is expected for 2013, the shares would then yield only 2.8%. That's considerably less than the average yield of a FTSE 100 (UKX) company.

On the other hand, Diageo is by no means an average company. Diageo delivered growth throughout the worldwide economic downturn. In the last five years, sales have increased, on average, 7.5% a year. Earnings per share (eps) increased by 14.0% a year. In those five years, the shareholder dividend rose 5.9% per annum on average.

Diageo is expected to deliver 10.4% earnings growth for 2013.

3) British American Tobacco (BATS)

Smokers are well known for their brand committment. Cigarette consumption is also a strong habit/addiction for many smokers. This makes BATS's long-term sales very dependable.

These facts are a huge contribution to BATS's success as an investment. The company has been increasing its shareholder dividend every year since 1999. In the last five years, that income stream has been increasing, on average, by 17.7% per annum.

However, there are real signs that the tobacco industry will have things much tougher in the next 10 years than they did in the last 50. Worldwide legislation toward tobacco consumption is becoming increasingly restrictive. Swiss voters recently went to the polls to decide whether to introduce a ban on smoking in enclosed spaces. In Australia, unbranded packaging is about to be enforced.

Sales growth at BATS last year came in at 3.5%. Growth is expected to be even less this year. Investors need to ask themselves if BATS is a company worth paying 15.4 times forecast earnings for.

4) Tesco

Since its disappointing trading update in January, Tesco has become one of the most debated FTSE 100 shares.

After having been top dog for a generation, there are growing signs that Tesco's lead is narrowing. Rival Sainsbury's (LSE:SBRY) market share has been increasing and premium supermarket Waitrose is also coming up fast.

Away from food, it is difficult to see how (or why) Tesco would wish to compete on home goods with Amazon. I did a quick price comparison on a 40-inch Samsung TV between the two stores. Despite an apparent £49 discount, Tesco Direct was still £107 more expensive.

Although brokers now expect earnings to fall marginally for 2013, the dividend is expected to rise (albeit very slightly). Earnings and dividend are expected to show better growth for 2014.

Can Tesco engineer an in-store turnaround? Will non-store initiatives (household goods, banking) be a success or an expensive failure? While Tesco's history is impressive, to me its future is less clear than it has been for a long time.

If you like the idea of investing in low beta stocks, then get the free Motley Fool report "8 Shares Held By Britain's Super Investor".This report profiled the holdings of Neil Woodford, widely regarded as the best money manager in the UK today. Mr Woodford owns a stake in some of the above companies. Get the report now to learn which shares and why.

"10 Steps To Making A Million In The Market" is the very latest Motley Fool guide to help Britain invest. Better. We urge you to read the free report today -- it may transform your wealth.

Further investment opportunities:

> David does not own share in any of the above companies. The Motley Fool owns shares in Tesco.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

F958B 24 Sep 2012 , 2:48pm

And what do they all have in common?

Dependability; they have not let their shareholders down when it comes to paying dividends through good times and bad.

All have maintained or increased their dividends in the toughest of economic times.

Investors are therefore less likely to panic out of such well-run companies, resulting in a more stable share price.

goodlifer 24 Sep 2012 , 9:32pm

"Low-beta shares are considered less risky."

Why?
Evidence?
Or superstition?

ANuvver 25 Sep 2012 , 1:39pm

Insofar as beta is a historically calculated measure of volatility against an index, low-beta shares are de facto less risky than the market they are measured against. Evidentially proven maths, not superstition.

But noone knows what tomorrow will bring...

goodlifer 25 Sep 2012 , 2:43pm

ANuvver,

If you're right - and I think you are - the higher, for a given value, the beta, the better.
You'll be able to buy them for less and sell them for more.

OTBE

Who's this know-all guy Noone?

ANuvver 25 Sep 2012 , 3:39pm

You surprise me - I didn't have you pegged as a rollercoaster fan!
I would say the sweet spot for a cautious soul would be to try to catch the donkey-ride stocks when everyone else is queueing for the ghost train.

Noone - Irish bloke who drinks in my local. He knows everything about everything. Engaging enough chap, but never seems to stand his round...

ANuvver 25 Sep 2012 , 3:43pm

My Italian mate, Inter Alia, can't stand him.

goodlifer 25 Sep 2012 , 3:43pm

What I find rather difficult is finding a share combining really good value with a nice high beta.
Any ideas?

vinchainsaw 25 Sep 2012 , 4:11pm

EMC goodlifer?

vinchainsaw 25 Sep 2012 , 4:12pm

Oops, EMG...

F958B 25 Sep 2012 , 4:25pm

goodlifer

In my experience, the market over-prices high-Beta shares and under-prices low-Beta shares.
Th high-Beta shares often do well in economic rebounds, but get hammered in downturns due to revenues being closely linked to the economic cycle.
If those high-Beta companies also geared-up with debt prior to the downturn, it often causes a lot of damage to the company and ends up with them offering little better return than low-Beta shares, despite the risk.

So for widows and orphans, low-Beta shares are likely to be much less risky and deliver long-term returns which equal the high-Beta shares.
High-Beta is for traders, speculators and those who like a thrill.

F958B 25 Sep 2012 , 4:33pm

BHP Billiton (Beta 1.7) are probably among the better high-beta shares; they were sufficiently well-managed in 2007-9 to be able to continue increasing the dividend during those difficult years and when most other miners reduced or cancelled their dividend payouts.

disclaimer: I do not hold BLT and have no plans to make a purchase in the forseeable future.

goodlifer 25 Sep 2012 , 6:45pm

ANuvver
"Evidentially proven maths."

Can you provide or steer me towards, the relevant proof?
Many thanks.

goodlifer 25 Sep 2012 , 7:07pm

And thanks 958B and vinchainsaw

I've got some EMG --sadly down -and some BLT - reasonably up - but it doesn't seem the right time to sell either at the moment.

I'm not brave enough to buy more EMG - I don't much like them anyway - but it might well make sense to buy more BLT when next month's divvies come rolling in

I've made a few bob this way on, of all things, BARC.
Currently there's a nice paper profit on my current holding - bought when Bob Diamond hit the headlines - but they still look so cheap it seems more sensible to buy some more than to sell.

Beta is not one of my buying criteria, I just like to give it a passing glance - you never know your luck!

F958B 25 Sep 2012 , 7:31pm

Beta doesn't bother me much, either - but I seem to end up selecting shares with Beta values lower than the FTSE as a result of my quest to find reliable companies at sensible prices.
The Beta values of my shareholdings range from 0.4 to 0.7.

ANuvver 25 Sep 2012 , 7:54pm

goodlifer:

Beta is not perfect - it has its flaws and its critics, and it can't really be possible to reduce the notion of risk to a single number. If only it were that easy.

If you are interested in the maths, have a look at linear regression and its application to the CAPM valuation model - which equates volatility with risk.

But for practical purposes, you can usefully assume that, ceteris paribus, when a market moves +-2%, an asset within that market with beta 0.5 will *tend* to move +-1%. In fact, the reason that asset's beta is calculated as 0.5 is because that's what it has *tended* to do in the past.

In the real world, of course, ceteris never is paribus, and you'll experience lags. For instance, high-beta banks and miners have recently led the charge at the expense of low-beta consumers and utilities. Now the risk money has ridden the trend for a bit, the balance is being redressed.

Particularly for an income-focused investor, it is quite possible to outperform the market with low-beta holdings. But we don't care about outperformance, do we? We have our goals.

goodlifer 25 Sep 2012 , 11:32pm

Thanks again - I'm sure the Maths is of negligible practical value, but I'll take a look in the faint hopes I'll be able to make head or tail of some of it.

Some hotshots seem to think beta measures risk, some volatility and some both.
Confusing.

But mathematicians and economists - or anyway some of them - love to make difficult things even more difficult for us plebs, so that they look even cleverer than they really are.

'Twas ever thus.

ANuvver 26 Sep 2012 , 1:31am

Who're you calling a pleb?
Oh sorry, yourself. As you were. Move along now, evening all.

vinchainsaw 26 Sep 2012 , 9:06am

goodlifer, sadly Im also sitting on a 40% loss on EMG... having a serious think about avergaing down, but will probably pass.

I dont like the company much either although I know a fair few good folk who work or have worked there.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.