Invest Better: 7 Layers Of Stock Diversification

Published in Investing on 20 September 2012

Diversification doesn't guarantee against losses, but it narrows the range of potential outcomes.

WASHINGTON, DC -- This month at The Motley Fool we've dedicated ourselves to getting back to basics, culminating on 25 September with Worldwide Invest Better Day. With this in mind, my Foolish colleagues and I are unleashing vital information to help you invest better. Today, we'll review stock diversification, a key fundamental of investing.

Think of a well-performing portfolio like a properly made seven-layer cake. Applying layers of diversification to your stock portfolio increases your odds of investing success. First we'll address why diversification is so important, then we'll dive into the delicious layers one by one.

Why all this diversification mumbo jumbo?

At the core of diversification lies the idea of correlation, a measure of how the returns of two investments move together. Some investments' returns move in the same directions; others move in opposite directions. The goal of diversification is to own a basket of investments whose returns move in opposite directions so that even if a portion of your portfolio is deteriorating, the rest of your portfolio is growing. In essence, we potentially mitigate the impact of poor market performance on our overall portfolio. Diversification doesn't guarantee against losses, but it narrows the range of potential outcomes.

Delectable layers

Let's take a closer look at what I call the seven layers of stock diversification.

1. Target how many stocks to own
Studies have shown you can achieve a well-diversified portfolio with as few as 15 and as many as 30 stocks. If individual stocks are to make up the majority of your portfolio, shoot for 25 to 30. To avoid concentrating too heavily in any one stock or sector, keep your stock portfolio at a minimum of 15. Contributing a set amount of money at regular intervals is a strategy you can use to buy a specific number of stocks over a period of time.

2. Don't overconcentrate
Fidelity feels an investor should have no more than 5% of their total portfolio in any individual stock; others think 10% is more realistic. Depending on whom you listen to, this answer will vary. But regardless of whose advice you heed, don't put so much money in any one holding that if you lost it all you'd be heartbroken or destitute.

3. Balance across sectors
Sectors perform differently during bull, bear and flat markets. Those considered "defensive", including consumer staples, utilities, telecom and health care, typically aren't as affected by a downturn in the economy as the more economically sensitive sectors like industrials, energy, financials, consumer discretionary and tech. A portfolio that includes all sectors has the best chance for success over the long haul regardless of market conditions.

4. Dig deeper into subsectors
Let's take the tech sector as an example. Within it there are companies that specialise in hardware, software, semiconductors and communications equipment. Owning only ARM Holdings (LSE: ARM) puts you at risk if something detrimental happens to the semiconductor market. But adding Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL.US), a company that sells iDevices and a bunch of related services, gives us a deeper level of diversification within the sector.

5. Screen for suitability
Stocks are categorised into different market capitalisations, or sizes, including small, mid and large caps. Stocks also pay different degrees of dividend income to shareholders. Do you need income now or can you forgo it? Your answer may lead you to skew your portfolio toward either more income-producing dividend stocks or more growth-oriented non-dividend-payers. An investor hungry for income is likely to find SSE (LSE: SSE) and Royal Dutch Shell (LSE: RDSB), with their respective 6.5% and 5% dividend yields, far more palatable than a small-cap non-dividend-payer. Even though the two companies are managed very differently from each other, they are similar in generating mouthwatering dividends for income-desiring investors.

6. Don't forget about international exposure
Geographical diversification counts, too. ASOS (LSE: ASC) derives 65% all of its business from international sales now, while Imperial Tobacco (LSE: IMT) is an example of a company profiting from increasing sales in emerging markets.

7. Monitor and maintain balance
Once we've built a beautifully layered cake, let's not take our eyes off it only to have it topple over. In order to maintain balance, we need to monitor our portfolios. Sometimes the hardest part of being an investor is selling winners and rebalancing, but smart investors do this systematically and free of emotion.

Are you looking to profit as a long-term investor? "10 Steps To Making A Million In The Market" is the latest Motley Fool guide to help Britain invest. Better. We urge you to read the report today -- while it's still free and available. 

Further investment opportunities:

> The Motley Fool does not own any shares in any of the companies mentioned.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

goodlifer 20 Sep 2012 , 8:02pm

"The goal of diversification is to own a basket of investments whose returns move in opposite directions."

Some people's goal maybe, but not for people like me who just reinvest their divvies for the long haul.

Obviously I pick my stocks as carefully as I can, but I'm bound to pick the odd dud. So I don't want too much invested in any one stock - there's safety in numbers

If I were infallible diversification would be pointless - I'd just bet the farm on the stock I knew to be the best.

One of my favourite quotes:
Down to Gehenna or up to the throne,
He travels fastest who travels alone.

Perhaps it's also worth mentioning that the more stocks you own the more probable one of them may unexpectedly take off.
Pretty nice when it happens,

apprenticeDRL 20 Sep 2012 , 11:31pm

"The goal of diversification is to own a basket of investments whose returns move in opposite directions."

Not sure I entirely agree with this sentiment. doesnt this mean that they have a tendacy to cancel each other leaving the portfolio stagnating rather than growing?

I think I agree with Goodlifers approach for the longhaul.

forrado 21 Sep 2012 , 1:24am

While I take the point of non-correlating assets and the protection they afford. Those of us fortunate enough to own property in the form of homes or still lucky enough to be enrolled in final salary pension schemes have a certain proportion of our asset base already in non-correlated assets. Therefore, such individuals could well be of the view of being able to take a bigger punt on stockmarket equity type investments than otherwise would be the case. The question of how much diversification is necessary is very much a matter of personal circumstance and not a one-size fits all formula.

“Think of a well-performing portfolio like a properly made seven-layer cake.”

Many of us may already have layers of this portfolio cake either partially or fully in place and don’t realise it. Nevertheless, I am very much on The Fool’s side when it comes to getting readers “back to basics” and the actual mechanics involved in constructing an asset base that will hold together and cope with the inevitable bumps-in-the-road along life’s financial highway.

Hannibalis 21 Sep 2012 , 9:47am

What the article doesn't talk about is diversification in asset classes - a fundamental approach. Academic research shows that the distribution of asset classes defines most of the portfolio return.

My own income-oriented portfolio includes: cash, cash bonds, income ETFs, dividend shares, corporate bonds, PIBS, prefs, etc.

http://www.the-diy-income-investor.com/p/portfolio.html

anecdotage 21 Sep 2012 , 10:19am

I agree with Hannibalis. Seven layers is only diversification of one asset. You are still entirely dependant on that one. True diversification can only be achieved with various assets, such as equities, bonds, cash and hard assets like gold, other commodities or property.

goodlifer 21 Sep 2012 , 3:48pm

Hannibalis, anecdotage,

Long, long ago I had to do an exam in Flight Planning.
The rubric said something like, "Candidates are recommended to treat the problems in a practical manner, and not to strain after theoretical perfection."
Good advice, and it applies to lots of other problems too.

It seems to me that you two gentlemen are straining after theoretical perfection.

My idea of diversification is a comfortable cushion of cash to live off, some property - our home - and our portfolio of 20-30 blue chips.

As dividend investors we don't really care about price movements, providing they don't go too high and the dividends, or most of them, keep thudding in.

If the whole economy were to go into meltdown a bit of gold might come in handy, as would a garden full of leeks and potatoes, but I can't see bonds, prefs etc being much use.

If you think I'm heading for disaster please, please, please tell me why.

vinchainsaw 21 Sep 2012 , 4:25pm

Largely with you goodlifer, in theory anyway.

I dont subscribe to any specific mantra of investing, except that I intensely dislike over-paying for something.

I like the idea of buying value, I also like the idea of buying growth and the idea of buying good dividend paying stocks.

I just buy whatever seems to be on sale when I have cash to hand.
I go through the fundamentals, look at the trend, all that. I just dont confine myself to myself to any one sort of stock.

I even own a soft commodities ETF as a "hedge" against the rise in household costs. It was at a good price when I bought it and has delivered a reasonable return thusfar.

To cut a long story short, by exercising size control, I've built up a relatively diverse portfolio without even meaning to.

goodlifer 22 Sep 2012 , 8:57pm

vinchainsaw
"I intensely dislike over-paying for something."
Me too.
I try to keep reminding myself, "Brilliant though this share now looks, what will I lose if it goes to the wall?"

"I like the idea of buying value, I also like the idea of buying growth and the idea of buying good dividend paying stocks."

Dearly though I love growth - when I get it - I don't have the guts to back forecast growth when I'm buying.

So I stick mainly to value, with just half an eye on the divvy.

If growth sometimes comes along - as it sometimes does - that's a lovely bonus.

ANuvver 23 Sep 2012 , 4:31pm

"The goal of diversification is to own a basket of investments whose returns move in opposite directions."

Odd thing to say - or clumsy at best. If anything, surely that's hedging (and rather unartful hedging at that), rather than diversification?

For me, diversification (within or across asset classes and sectors) is just a way of ensuring your bottom line doesn't get too badly hit when (not if) any individual holding hits the skids. I'm not just talking about capital appreciation - if one or two of my income equities freezes, cuts or even suspends the dividend, the others will mitigate the impact.

I agree with goodlifer's sentiment: "If this dies, how much of me will die with it?" - sort of thing.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.