You're Paying Even More In Fund Charges Than You Think

Published in Investing on 12 September 2012

... but you don’t have to pay a penny.

If you thought you were paying too much in fund management charges, you don't know the half of it. The truth is you're paying even more than you think. Much, much more.

Over the years, fund managers will siphon off tens of thousands of pounds from your portfolio, doing far more damage to your wealth than the odd stock market dip.

At least when the market dips, you might recover your losses in the next rally. But any fee you pay to a fund manager is gone for good, and you will also lose all future growth on that money.

Yet most investors don't realise how much damage they do.

Guilty as charged

Unit trusts are the default fund choice for most people's stocks and shares ISA allowance and some of the worst fee offenders, so let's see what you pay

Say you invest £10,000 in a unit trust with an initial charge of 5.25% (some funds charge even more!). You have instantly gifted the manager £525, and he hasn't done anything yet.

This means you are actually investing just £9,475. You will then typically pay an annual management fee of 1.5% on that money. In the first 12 months, you have paid £667 in total charges.

And that's only the beginning.

Invest £10,000, pay £20,000

It's the annual management fee that does most of the damage, because you pay it year after year after year, and on a rising sum of money.

Let's assume your fund delivers a total return of 6% a year. If you hadn't paid any initial or annual charges, your money would be worth £17,908 after 10 years. Instead, you have just £14,714. Charges have cost you £3,194 in lost growth.

After 20 years, you will have lost £9,220. And after 30 years, you will sacrificed the grand total of £21,947, almost double the sum you originally invested.

Without charges, you would have £57,434. Instead you have just £35,487.

Since you are likely to invest more than £10,000, your losses will be much, much greater than that.

Hidden howlers

True, you can escape that initial charge by investing through a discount broker or fund supermarket. But it's the annual fee that does the real damage, and that is much harder to escape.

Incredibly, fund fees are even more brutal than my figures suggest, according to the True and Fair Campaign, which wants to clean up the fund management industry.

The average investment fund has a total expense ratio of 1.63% a year, but hidden charges, including dealing and performance fees, can push the total costs closer to 3% a year.

That's double the figure I used in my calculations, doubling your losses.

No free lunches

Investment fund charges are a throwback to the days when markets regularly delivered double-digit growth. Investors barely noticed that 1.5% annual charge if their fund was growing at 15% a year.

But in these days of lower growth rates, 1.5% looks plain greedy. Why should fund managers still make merry when their clients have to subsist on a diet of thin gruel?

As ever, there are exceptions. I am still happy to pay a 1.5% annual management fee for the stock-picking skills of Neil Woodford, who runs equity income flyer Invesco-Perpetual Income.

But three out of four fund managers underperform their benchmark index. Who wants to pay for that?

FTSE faves

I wish the True and Fair Campaign good luck in its war against the UK investment industry, but you can take action today.

If you build your own portfolio of high-quality stocks, you don't have to pay any initial charges or, best of all, annual management fee. All you have to pay are trading charges and stamp duty.

You could take your pick from big UK blue chips such as Aviva (LSE: AV), BT Group (LSE: BT-A), GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK), Prudential (LSE: PRU), Reckitt Benckiser (LSE: RB), Royal Dutch Shell (LSE: RDSB), Sainsbury's (LSE: SBRY), Unilever (LSE: ULVR) and Vodafone (LSE: VOD).

Alternatively, you could buy a low-cost FTSE tracker, the cheapest of which charge total fees of just 0.2% a year.

Top sectors

If you want more ideas, why not download our special report by Motley Fool analysts, "Top Sectors for 2012". It is completely free and looks at three different sectors that could kick-start your portfolio.

We're not fund managers, so we won't charge you anything for this report, but availability is strictly limited, so download it now.

Are you looking to profit as a long-term investor? "10 Steps To Making A Million In The Market" is the latest Motley Fool guide to help Britain invest. Better. We urge you to read the report today -- while it's still free and available. 

 Further Motley Fool investment opportunities:

> Harvey owns Aviva, Glaxo, Prudential, Royal Dutch Shell, Vodafone and Invesco-Perpetual Income. He doesn't own any other investment mentioned in this article.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

MunroMan 12 Sep 2012 , 3:28pm

More details on costs at www.smart-beta.co.uk

Jonesey12 12 Sep 2012 , 3:43pm

Thanks, LordEssex.

Harvey Jones

lootman 12 Sep 2012 , 6:22pm

Actually the cheapest UK tracker has a TER of just 0.1% per annum, not 0.2%. That's the new'ish Vanguard UK ETF, symbol VUKE.

OK, it's an ETF and not a fund. But there's no stamp duty on it, so just an ordinary share commission in and out.

Nice to hear from you again, Essex.

jaizan 12 Sep 2012 , 7:06pm

I'm slowly reducing ETF exposure due to a lack of transparency.

After that, I should be left with a mixture of Investment Trusts and stocks.
As for management fees, I don't mind if it's for a manager who has outperformed for at least a decade.

ANuvver 12 Sep 2012 , 9:09pm

Decent rundown Harvey. Good stuff.

Timely in my case. I've just liberated the last of my "managed" stuff. It's almost humorous having to consistently remind the pros exactly whose money it is, so you can wrench it out of their hands.

I'm also in the process of taking a blunderbuss to the mortgage (and am fully loin-girded to meet the same resistance). Remarkable that gilts have had the run of their lives during the term of my loan, yet costs (inter alia) have resulted in it being the financial equivalent of a piggy bank with a crack in the bottom.

Now a mortgage is the only really justifiable debt a sensible investor can accept. But it still automatically puts you the wrong side of the industry costs carousel, and if you're lucky enough to be able to overpay or even get shot completely, it's usually the best investment you can make. Some regard an aggressive attack on the mortgage as the most tax-efficient savings strategy possible.

As someone who "trades" maybe half a dozen time a year at most, my one-off expense ratio is less than most annuals. Long-term buy and watch...

PS I'm thinking of changing my nom de fou to something like ThriftyParadox. Any thoughts?

Chinanigel 13 Sep 2012 , 2:27am

There are lots of good investment trusts which are a much better alternative to unit trusts, mine are HEFT, MRCH and ASL.

closetspeculator 13 Sep 2012 , 8:04am

An article on Fund charges and no mention of Fool fav Woodford for once ;-)

AliciaS7 13 Sep 2012 , 10:01am

It is amazingly sad to realize that we have no clue where all our money goes and especially what we are charged for. We simply do not know laws properly. Manager's fees is important as long as he can get you some money.
Alicia from http://cashadvancesus.com/

jaizan 13 Sep 2012 , 9:37pm

ANuvver, I made the mistake of paying off all the mortgage before starting my first ISA.
However, I can never recover the "lost" ISA allowance from those years.
So I probably should have started the ISA 2 or 3 years before fully paying off the mortgage.

ANuvver 13 Sep 2012 , 9:58pm

jaizan:

Sure. If you're going to be a DIYer, you have to be cute on tax - which is not easy, I'll grant you.

When MIRAS dropped away, I knew I was being shafted but I still needed the loan at the time.

Since you mention ISA wraps, I'm sitting here currently trying to decide what to do with my unallocated 12/13 allowance while asset prices seem to be hysterically racing north ...

vinchainsaw 14 Sep 2012 , 9:21am

ANuvver, I know what you mean.

Thankfully I still have some Bed & ISA available... thought id get the opportunity to sell into my ISA a lot cheaper. Oh well, there's still time (I hope).

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.