Head To Head: BHP Billiton vs Rio Tinto

Published in Investing on 24 August 2012

Which mining giant should you buy today?

In this new series, some of your favourite FTSE 100 (UKX) shares go head to head in a three-round contest for superiority.

In Round 1, the firms fight on earnings; in Round 2, on dividends; and Round 3 is a battle of the balance sheets. The winner will be the company that has racked up most points at the end of the contest.

Stepping into the ring today are mining giants BHP Billiton (LSE: BLT) and Rio Tinto (LSE: RIO).

Fears about slowing growth in China and the eurozone have seen the shares of BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto underperform the FTSE 100 index over the last six months. The Footsie has moved 3% lower, but BHP Billiton is down 6% and Rio Tinto has dropped 20%.

Let's take our seats at ringside.

Round 1: earnings

 BHP BillitonRio Tinto
Recent share price1,961p2,957
Last year price-to-earnings (P/E)9.75.8
Current year forecast P/E9.37.4
Four-year average earnings per share (eps) growth (%)1127
Current year forecast eps growth (%)4-23
Forecast operating margin (%)3329

Source: Digital Look. Winners in bold.

Rio Tinto just edges the first round with its lower historic and forecast P/E ratios and superior historic eps growth.

It's worth noting, though, that it's the historic measures that clinch it for Rio. Billiton takes points on forecast EPS growth and forecast operating margin, and narrows the gap with Rio – though without taking the point – on forecast P/E.

Round 2: dividends

 BHP BillitonRio Tinto
Last year dividend yield (%)3.63.1
Current year forecast dividend yield (%)4.03.3
4-year average dividend growth (%)1329
Current year forecast dividend growth (%)108
Forecast dividend cover2.73.9

Source: Digital Look. Winners in bold.

Billiton earns a narrow win in the second round thanks to its superior historic and forecast dividend yield and forecast dividend growth.

Rio was particularly let down by the big drop in forecast dividend growth compared with its four-year average – reflecting expectations of negative earnings growth in the current year.

Round 3: balance sheet

 BHP BillitonRio Tinto
Price/book (P/B)1.01.1
Net gearing (%)3623

Source: Digital Look. Winners in bold.

Billiton and Rio share the points in the final round, which means the contest ends all square. They've both won one round and drawn one, and have six points each overall.

Post-match assessment

The two contestants have acquitted themselves well. Both currently have low P/Es and high dividend yields relative to their own -- and the sector's -- historic averages. Their P/Bs indicate their assets are reasonably valued, while modest gearing points to strong balance sheets.

Mining is a cyclical industry, and earnings have dipped for the time being. But both companies should reward long-term investors -- although which of the pair will deliver the better return looks finely balanced.

However, the Motley Fool's top analysts have identified mining as one of three attractive sectors for 2012 and beyond; and each analyst has pinpointed an outstanding company in each sector.

To discover if BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto or another miner gets the crown -- as well as the top picks in the two other attractive industries -- grab yourself a copy of the free special report "Top Sectors Of 2012". The report is available for a limited time only, but you can have it in your inbox in seconds simply by clicking here.

Are you looking to profit as a long-term investor? "10 Steps To Making A Million In The Market" is the Motley Fool's latest guide to help Britain invest. Better. We urge you to read the report today –while it's still free and available.

Further investment opportunities:

> G A Chester does not own any of the shares mentioned in this article.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Mark878 24 Aug 2012 , 2:22pm

It's a crapshoot. Stock picking is for gamblers. Why not buy the sector instead with XSPR ETF or Blackrock World Mining ETF.

maninjersey 24 Aug 2012 , 2:33pm

What a waste of time. .We read these articles for advice on what to buy.Mr Chester should get off the fence.

jackdaww 24 Aug 2012 , 3:19pm

maninjersey

i read them for information - which there is here .

i then decide what to buy myself.

apprenticeDRL 24 Aug 2012 , 3:59pm

I think your right. At the end of the day the point of this is to assimilate the information and make a decission.

Would it really help that much to know what Mr Chester prefers? or as he states he prefers them equally

F958B 24 Aug 2012 , 4:02pm

maninjersey

If you must buy one of the two, go for BLT.
They are more likely to be reliable, as demonstrated by their dividend history (RIO cut the divi in 2009) and their lower Beta (volatility: BLT=1.6 v RIO=1.8). Both therefore much more volatile than the FTSE100.
BLT also pay the higher yield at present (3.6% v 3.1%) and highest expected (4.0% v 3.3%).
Dividends are the closest thing to certainty that an invetsor will get. With the current dramatic slowdown in China's commodity consumption, and falling commodity prices, and therefore the slashing of investment plans form commodity companies, growth may be hard to come by.
BLT have not let their shareholders down yet when it comes to keeping the dividends flowing.

RIO are likely to be somewhat riskier, but with risk comes the potential for reward.
Perhaps the Fed's recent hints at more QE will cause the "risk-on" trade to flourish, in which case consider the even-more-volatile miners such as Vedanta (Beta=2.5), Kazakhmys (Beta=2.3), Antofagasta (Beta=2.0), but I emphasise that risk and reward go hand-in-hand. Vedant's Beta of 2.5 implies that their share price has amplified (up and down) the FTSE's moves by 2.5x in the last year.

But I would rather have the more reliable company; BLT, with less upside but a lot less downside and the comfort of a dividend if the share price implodes. Rule number one: don't lose money.

At the moment, I don't hold either BLT or RIO, I don't hold any commodity shares and I don't plan to buy any time soon.

salmo365 24 Aug 2012 , 4:35pm

I did my own analysis and in the end opted for Vale. So there!

a much lower p/b & p/e and a higher yield.

Don't be afraid to invest overseas!

QuantumDealer 24 Aug 2012 , 4:57pm

Salmo - do you buy the ADR or local?

goodlifer 25 Aug 2012 , 1:07pm

What's ADR?

M0byDick 25 Aug 2012 , 1:33pm

goodlifer - an ADR is an "American Depositary Receipt". Many non-US companies -- such as Vale -- are trade on US stock exchanges via ADRs. ADRs are traded like regular shares. In Vale's case, rather than investing in its Brazil-listed shares, you have the option of investing via its New York-listed ADRs. More on ADRs here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_depositary_receipt
Foolish best
MobyDick

jackdaww 25 Aug 2012 , 7:04pm

f958b

your views on pros and cons of commodity shares ie bhp, rdsb, bg would be much appreciated.

jackdaww 26 Aug 2012 , 9:28am

f958b

sorry i meant just commodities in general - not specific stocks.

F958B 26 Aug 2012 , 4:10pm

I've been slightly bearish on the medium-term outlook for commodities for a while because:

1.
The trend has been running for a long time.

2.
The underlying economic trends are deflationary, supported by QE.

3.
China's boom is slowing.

4.
Every paragraph in cmmodity company accounts contains the word "China" several times.

5.
Commodity companies are piling into investments and acqusitions with a "we're invincible" mindset. That's often a sign of a bubble.

6.
The massive (over)investment will probably cause sharply lower prices further down the line.

BHP gave a virtual profits warning a couple of months ago and today, BHP made another announcement regarding the industrial commodity slowdown:
http://boards.fool.co.uk/bhp-sees-long-term-price-fall-for-commodities-12628004.aspx

I had planned to buy into BHP at the turn of this year, but they ran away from me before I had money in position, then the Fed denied QE to the markets, now China has a major slowdown and the long-running bull market in equities is looking stretched and tired.

So I'm not really interested in commodities now, apart from gold because of its crisis protection potential.

But if I was forced to hold commodity companies, I'd go for quality such as BLT and RDSB and accept that they have a lower reward compared to other commodity companieas, but they also have lower risk.
If BLT and RDSB were currently in my portfolio, I'd be content to hold long-term.

If I held other commodity companies, I would look to reduce holdings if the FTSE moves up another 5-10% unless the Fed is going to do some imminent and massive QE; nothing short of imminent and massive QE can stop the downside now, but I fear that the Fed are simply making noises until the election, but ultimately will not do more QE in an attempt to get the US government to address the deficit rather than keep relying on the Fed.

jackdaww 27 Aug 2012 , 11:13am

f958b

many thanks for detailed and useful info.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.