Only Dividends Can Save You From Annuity Hell

Published in Investing on 16 August 2012

The worse annuities get, the better dividends look.

Just because something has fallen sharply, doesn't mean it can't fall even further. Just look at annuities. Rates keep on falling and falling and falling.

Every time Mervyn King, magician to the Coalition, conjures another slab of virtual money, he forces down gilt yields, which in turn forces down annuity rates.

With the Bank of England recently printing another £50 billion of electronic money, and another £50 billion expected by November, it's hard to say when annuities will finally bottom out.

Rising life expectancy only makes things worse, as that annuity pot has to cover more ground. More than one million pensioners have been trapped in annuity hell since the financial crisis struck.

The incredible shrinking annuity

Most financial advisers will tell you that an annuity is still the starting point for your retirement income. It gives you the certainty you need in retirement, by paying a regular income for as long as you live. Your annuity is never going to run out. That kind of security is not to be sniffed at.

Unfortunately, annuity rates have a nasty stench about them these days. By shopping around, a 65-year old man with a £100,000 pension pot could buy a level annuity worth at most £5,700 a year, according to Hargreaves Lansdown Pensions.

If he wanted that annuity to rise with inflation, his starting income would shrink to a mere £3,500. And if he needed a joint life annuity, to cover his wife or partner, it would shrink further.

Once he buys that annuity, he can't switch if he spots a better rate. This is for life. Nor can he get his hands on any of the capital. It has gone for good.

Hell is for heroes

Luckily, you don't have to buy an annuity when you retire. There is an alternative, and right now, it looks heroic by comparison. Which is just what you need in these hellish times.

Instead of using that £100,000 to buy an annuity, you could invest it in a spread of dividend-yielding shares instead. That could generate income of £4,000 to £5,000 a year, and you get to keep your capital as well.

Better still, the value of your capital will rise in future, if stock markets rise. And so could your income, as the underlying companies hike their dividends.

That's slightly less than the annuity income, but of course, you still have your capital.

If that £100,000 is sitting in a pension, you could do this by investing in a drawdown plan. If you hold that money in an ISA, you have even more flexibility.

Feel the yield

There are plenty of tempting dividend-paying blue chips to choose from right now. GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) and Sainsbury's (LSE: SBRY) both yield more than 4.8%. Legal & General (LSE: LGEN) and Standard Life (LSE: SL) yield more than 5%. BAE Systems (LSE: BAE) and SSE (LSE: SSE) yield around 6%. Aviva (LSE: AV) yields over 8%.

There is nothing hellish about those yields. In fact, they're quite heavenly.

Long division

Staying footloose and fancy-free is riskier than plighting your troth to an annuity, of course. If you invest in dividend-paying stocks, even solid blue chips, neither your income or capital is secure.

The good news is that this isn't an either/or question. You could invest, say, half your pension in an annuity, and half in a portfolio of dividend-yielding stocks.

You could further balance your risk, by splitting your annuity between a level and index-linked income, to balance that higher initial income against valuable protection against inflation.

Zeros and heroes

Hargreaves Lansdown (LSE: HL) has produced figures looking at what would have happened if you invested £100,000 in equity income 20 years ago.

The answer is that lots of nice things would have happened. By now, you would have received total income of £131,500. Better still, your capital will have risen to a pleasant £240,000.

In 2011, you would have received £6,000 income. True, this is much less than the £14,000 a year you would have got from an annuity, but no annuity pays that kind of return these days.

The worse annuities get, the better dividends look. They are the heroes of the current investment world, and are likely to stay that way, even after annuity rates stop falling. Whenever that is.

Are you looking to profit from this uncertain economy? "10 Steps To Making A Million In The Market" is the very latest Motley Fool guide to help Britain invest. Better. We urge you to read the report today -- it's free. 

Further Motley Fool investment opportunities:

> Harvey holds shares in Aviva, Glaxo and Invesco-Perpetual Income. He doesn't own any other investment mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool owns shares in Hargreaves Lansdown.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

goodlifer 16 Aug 2012 , 9:51pm

I've often wondered why apparently sensible people are still happy to get mixed up with such an obvious con.




















vinniw 17 Aug 2012 , 9:19am

"Luckily, you don't have to buy an annuity when you retire".

Help me out here, surely if you save in a Pension Fund then in simple terms, you do have to buy an annuity? With a SIPP you can go into income drawdown but the option you imply that you can set up an ISA and take the Divi income is misleading, surely?

Bedevilled 17 Aug 2012 , 11:17am

It is misleading. You can only take out 25% of your capital from an annuity fund and only when you take the rest as an annuity. The above is wholly misleading - it suggests that it is a 100% either / or decision. Come on fool, this is wrong!

drocke 17 Aug 2012 , 12:43pm

But for those Fools lucky enough to have a secured pension that is at least £20,000 then flexible draw down from a SIPP gives you total flexibility. As I understand it you can get 25% of the SIPP's capital tax free then draw down as much or as little of the remaining SIPP funds as income as you wish per annum but paying tax on that income at whatever you marginal rate of tax is for that year. So you can keep your capital invested in dividend yield stocks or whatever to pay you an income but still have acess to your capital albeit subject to a tax charge. If there is any left when you die then the tax on the remaining would be at 55%. So use it all just before you leave this world!!

vinniw 17 Aug 2012 , 12:53pm

But drocke, dont we come to the conclusion that you would be better off investing for your retirement in ISAs? I know you lose the tax relief on contributions but your subsequent drawdowns as income from your ISA) would be tax free. I am taking a balanced approach, some SIPP, some ISA, some cash and some from previous company plans. I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that pension plans as such are too restrictive.

drocke 17 Aug 2012 , 12:59pm

The balanced approach is always a good idea. There is a relatively low maximum that can go into ISAs and the SIPP has aavantages if you are a higher rate taxpayer when working but expect to be a lower rate one on retirement. You can also transfer funds into a SIPP from other pension funds that may not offer flexible drawdown. Each person will obviosly have unique set of circumstances to consider

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.