They can fiddle with depreciation to report higher profits.
Last Tuesday I wrote about how accounting rules make it all but impossible for companies to value brands in their accounts. Today I'm going to look at a way in which companies take advantage of these rules to boost their reported profits.
Over time, a company's buildings and machines will gradually wear out. This is allowed for in the accounts by making a charge for depreciation, which is based upon the value of the assets and their expected working lifetime. This is set against both the assets and profits.
However, if you look at some companies' accounts, you'll see that the depreciation charge used is lower than that required by the taxman for calculating their tax liabilities. Companies do this because a lower depreciation charge means higher reported profits.
We don't do depreciation
Property companies generally don't depreciate their freehold properties. The reason for doing this, one which I totally agree with, is that their expenditure for maintenance and repairs should be sufficient to offset the depreciation. However, if they don't spend enough then they should make a depreciation charge.
But when they calculate their corporation tax liability, the properties are depreciated at the maximum rate allowed by the taxman because this reduces what they have to pay in tax.
Over £500 million profit and a tax rebate
You'll see a good example of this in the 2012 annual report of Britain's largest property company, Land Securities (LSE: LAND). Its depreciation charge was a mere £0.5 million against £7.25 billion of investment properties (see note 14 to the accounts).
Had it depreciated its buildings over a 50-year period, which is common practice, this would have created a £145 million depreciation charge against its profits. Land Securities did, however, claim enough allowances to reduce its effective corporation tax rate for 2012 to about -1.5%. So on £515.7 million of profits it received a tax rebate of £8 million.
Similarly, British Land (LSE: BLND) reported just £1 million of depreciation on almost £4.8 billion of properties in its most recent results while the central London office specialist Great Portland Estates (LSE: GPOR) didn't report any depreciation.
If you're new to the stock market and are puzzled by some of the terminology that I've used here, a good place to start is to have a look at our latest guide -- "What Every New Investor Needs To Know". It's free and you can download your copy from this link.
Watch out for obsolescence
Most companies will depreciate their freehold properties over periods of between ten and fifty years. But if technological and/or social change impairs the value of these properties, or that of the companies' other assets, then the depreciation rates used will probably be insufficient to allow for the reduction in the value of their assets.
This happened to a lot of canals in the 1830s as soon as a railway was built to follow a similar route. Canals that were valued at millions in the books turned out to be worth very little because rail freight took away most of their business within a few years.
National Grid (LSE: NG) depreciates most of its electricity network over 30 to 100 years. This is a fair assumption to make because electricity transmission uses 19th century technology, for which the laws of physics tell us that there isn't going to be any change barring truly radical developments.
But if a 21st century equivalent of Nikola Tesla invented a cheap way to wirelessly broadcast huge amounts of electricity over long distances, National Grid would be left with a greatly overvalued asset on its books.
Consumer Goods, Pharmaceuticals, Property, Banks -- just where should you invest today? "Top Sectors Of 2012" is the Motley Fool's latest guide to help Britain invest. Better. The report is free and can be downloaded from this link.
Further Motley Fool investment opportunities:
> Tony owns shares in Great Portland Estates and National Grid.