Are These The Ultimate Retirement Shares?

Published in Investing on 6 August 2012

Which of these five shares would be best for a FTSE-beating retirement fund?

The last five years have been tough for those in retirement. Portfolio valuations have been hammered and annuity rates have plunged. There's no sign of things improving anytime soon, either, as the eurozone and the UK economy look set to muddle through at best for some years to come.

A great way of protecting yourself from the downturn, however, is by building your retirement fund with shares of large, well-run companies that should grow their earnings steadily over the coming decades. Over time, such investments ought to result in rising dividends and inflation-beating capital growth.

In this series, I'm tracking down the UK large-caps that have the potential to beat the FTSE 100 (UKX) over the long term and support a lower-risk income-generating retirement fund (you can see all of the companies I've covered so far on this page).

Over the last week or so, I've looked at Tesco (LSE: TSCO), Vodafone (LSE: VOD), British American Tobacco (LSE: BATS), Unilever (LSE: ULVR) and BP (LSE: BP). Let's take a look at how each of them scored against my five key retirement share criteria:

CriteriaBPVodafoneUnileverBATTesco
Longevity5/54/55/55/55/5
Performance vs. FTSE3/55/55/55/54/5
Financial strength3/53/54/53/53/5
EPS growth2/53/53/54/54/5
Dividend growth3/54/53/54/55/5
Total16/2519/2520/2521/2521/25

Every little helps

Tesco and BAT take joint first place in this quintet, with both matching the series' best score to date of 21/25. For me, the key attractions of both companies are their large scale and pricing power; neither is particularly cyclical and both have huge market shares. As a result, both pay above-average dividends and have excellent records of dividend growth. BAT is tremendously profitable and while Tesco's profits are under pressure at present, I believe it will recover from its current slump in form.

Unilever is a global consumer goods giant whose products -- which include brands like Cif, Domestos and Bertolli -- we all use. Its focus on and experience in emerging markets has helped it outperform the FTSE 100 in recent years and deliver strong growth. Unilever's size and diversity should help mitigate any regional or product-specific problems it faces in the future and I believe that over time it will offer good yield on cost growth.

Mobile telecoms giant Vodafone is a high-yield favourite with Fools and also offers the potential for steady long-term growth, having managed to transform itself from a hot growth stock to an established blue chip within a decade. Dot-com boom era investors may still be nursing a loss, but for the rest of us it's doing very nicely and looks set to continue to do so.

Bringing up the rear in this selection is the FTSE 100's fourth-largest company, BP. BP is in transition at the moment and its relatively low score of 16/25 reflects this -- yet I feel confident that in the long term, it will become an excellent retirement share once more. Indeed, if you intend to hold forever and are willing to accept a slightly higher risk, BP may offer the potential for greater capital gains and dividend growth than its peer, Royal Dutch Shell.

Expert selections

Although doing your own research is important, one way of identifying great dividend-paying shares is to study the choices of successful professional investors. One of the most successful income investors currently working in the City is fund manager Neil Woodford, who manages £20bn of private investors' money - more than any other City manager. Neil Woodford's dividend stock picks have outperformed the wider index by a staggering 305% over the last 15 years.

You can learn about Neil Woodford's top holdings and how he generates such fantastic profits in this free Motley Fool report. Many of Mr Woodford's choices look like excellent retirement shares to me and the report explains how he chose some of his biggest holdings.

This report is completely free and I strongly recommend you download"8 Shares Held By Britain's Super Investor" today, as it's available for a limited time only.

Warren Buffett buys British! The legendary investor has recently topped up on his favourite UK blue chip. Discover what he bought -- and the price he paid -- within our latest free report!

Further investment opportunities:

> Roland owns shares in Tesco, Vodafone and Unilever but does not own any of the other shares mentioned in this article.  The Motley Fool owns shares in Tesco and has recommended Unilever.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

goodlifer 06 Aug 2012 , 10:45am

I've had another look at your "8 Shares Held By Britain's Super Investor"

It may be an illusion, but Mr Woodford's practice seem to contradict the gospel you Foolish writers preach over diversification and asset allocation.

For example, Mr Woodford holds no less than three tobaccos

In a recent interview Mr Kuo was at great pains to stress that holding both Sainsburys and Tescos didn't amount to sensible diversification because they're both supermarkets.
And Mr Woodford holds no shares in the banking sector.

How can Mr Woodford apparently ignore the principles that apply to ordinary mortals?

Or does your article misrepresent his strategy?

Or - perhaps most likely - does Foolsh teaching on diversification need to be updated?

An awful lot of what's said about diversification and asset allocation looks like superstitious rubbish..

F958B 06 Aug 2012 , 11:46am

I think Buffett once said:

"Diversification is for those who don't know what they're doing"

I agree.

Both Buffett and Woodford aren't enthusiastic on diversification.
Neither am I, beyond a limited amount.

Diversification means that your winners have to carry the deadweight of the losers; holding back portfolio performance.
By selecting only those investments with the greatest probablity of making a good return, and avoiding those with a low probability of a good return, an investor will do well.

So here's another Buffett quote:
"An investor needs to do very few things right as long as he or she avoids big mistakes"

And one of my interpretations of that is don't bother to diversify if it adds an inferior investment to those which you already have.



F958B 06 Aug 2012 , 12:00pm

Oh - another big mistake is that too many investors are greedy and want to "get rich quick".
With stockmarkets, an investor is much more likely to be successful if they try to get rich slowly - by investing as if they were running a multi-million pound "wealth fund" for their family's retirement.
Funnily enough, that's basically Woodford's style which has helped him beat the market handsomely over the years.

Greed, lack of patience, lack of using logic, allowing emotion to interfere with decisions, and lack of discipline are major reasons why a lot of private investors achieve results inferior to simply buying an index tracker.

jackdaww 06 Aug 2012 , 12:12pm

buffetts "measuring stick" approach seems to say dont buy a stock if its not as good as what you already have.

i hold 12 stocks and just keep adding at hopefully the right time.

i can find only one stock i like in addition to those 12 - that is compass - which i sold at about 550 thinking - the usual dilemma - it was too high - it now almost 700.

F958B 06 Aug 2012 , 12:44pm

jackdaww

Apart from a few small top-ups of existing holdings, I have made only one new addition to my portfolio this year: Centrica around 280-285p in January.

On the selling side, I have reduced my holding in a few companies by up to one-third, but no holdings have been sold entirely.

Got a few dividends sitting in the bank at the moment because nothing takes my fancy at current prices.

Portfolio churn rate probably averages 5-10% per year.

Lethargy bordering on sloth . Be right and sit tight.


jackdaww 06 Aug 2012 , 2:04pm

f958b

thanks

centrica - well done.

my divis also building up - only morrisons and tesco worth considering at present.

spending the time attempting to learn about companies - not easy.

goodlifer 06 Aug 2012 , 8:24pm

F958B
I think Buffett once said:
"Diversification is for those who don't know what they're doing"

Do you have the reference?

hottentot47 06 Aug 2012 , 11:00pm

Boring old me, I just like Blue Chips with decent divs. Fancy buying SSE ( for the first time); want to top-up on GSK but too dear for me, wait and see how low they go when ex-D in next couple of days. Likewise ULVR. Have fancied buying SBRY for some time - again seems dear - thought I would look again when they go ex-D again in Nov (!) ... patience. My preference is to buy whenever a share goes ex-D, sacrificing the short-term gain for a bumper number of shares. Rubbish strategy? Perhaps it works if you (and the co.) live long enough.
As pleased as I am that my AVL shares are looking less sick - although still a basket case - I would prefer a decent spell of gloom froom Euroland so that I could buy something at a good price. This latest up-turn is annoying, when you know it won't last - or will it? Are we doomed or not? To buy or not to buy... Everything is too dear at present.
Miserable Old Git ( yes, from Scotland)

TonyTwoTimes 07 Aug 2012 , 7:15am

The problem with a non-diversified portfolio is that it’s great when it works and when it goes wrong it’s often appalling.

I know someone offline who subscribed to the “bet the farm”, “diversification is for wimps” and "if it's a good thing why not gear up" strategies.

In 2008 his portfolio was stuffed with financials as they were “a sure thing”. I reckon that he took a 100% hit.

In contrast my 40+ share portfolio (“diversification is protection against black swans and corporate mismanagement / fraud”) which is 20% USA, 15% Canada (to reduce country-specific risk) is up by around 20% since then.

goodlifer 08 Aug 2012 , 11:57am

F958B
I think Buffett once said:

"Diversification is for those who don't know what they're doing"

Did Buffett really say that ?
Where?

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.