The Best Time To Buy Blue-Chip Bargains

Published in Investing on 25 July 2012

Some shares are just too expensive. So wait.

When is a great share just too expensive? It's a question that has been taxing investors on one of our most popular discussion boards in the last few days.

The share in question? Drinks giant Diageo (LSE: DGE). And the reluctant conclusion is that Diageo, while a bomb-proof business, is too richly priced -- at least for income investors.

Put another way -- as respected poster valuemargin did -- if you bought Diageo today, you're buying a share on a forecast price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 17, and yield of just 2.4%. Extrapolating Diageo's most-recent 10-year average annual dividend growth over the next 10 years, you'd be looking at a yield of 4.3% in terms of the price paid.

Everyday value

And, quite simply, there are good safe businesses out there offering that sort of yield right now. Sainsbury (LSE: SBRY) is on a forecast yield of 5.3%, for instance -- a whole percentage point higher. Royal Dutch Shell (LSE: RDSB) offers 5.1%. GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) 5.0%.

In short, time and again you'll find decent blue-chip businesses on lower P/Es and higher yields than Diageo is offering in 10 year's time -- never mind today.

So what's an investor to do?

Bide your time

Not for the first time, valuemargin told us his own view -- which concurs with mine. Sit on your hands, keep some cash in reserve, and if an opportunity presents itself to lock in a lower P/E and a higher yield, grab it. If it doesn't, don't.

In valuemargin's case, the stock in question -- or at least, the one that I most vividly recall him mentioning in this context -- was Cobham (LSE: COB). A first-class business, yet an expensive one. But given the chance, he grabbed it. Having, what's more, waited a decade for the opportunity.

Blue-chip bargain

In my own case, Rolls-Royce (LSE: RR) comes to mind. It's coming up for two years, for example, since shares in the aero-engine manufacturer plunged 15% or so in the space of a week.

The cause? The emergency landing of a Qantas Airbus A380 -- the world's largest passenger jet -- in Singapore, after an engine lost one or more turbine blades over western Indonesia, an event that attracted headlines around the world.

Passengers, investors and airline executives alike were spooked. Something, somehow, had gone badly wrong. And so the share price underwent the same kind of emergency descent as the stricken jet had done.

At which point, I bought a decent chunk, for my SIPP, tucking them away at 598 pence. Since then, the FTSE 100 (UKX) has more or less flat-lined, while Rolls-Royce is up 42%.

Watch list

As it happens, another share I had my eye on also abruptly fell into bargain territory earlier this year. Needless to say, I've been loading up on that, too. As has an investor with a rather better track record than mine -- a certain Warren Buffett.

The name of the share in question is revealed in this free special report from The Motley Fool -- “The One UK Share Warren Buffett Loves” -- along with an in-depth analysis of the value that Buffett sees in it. Why not take a look? It can be in your inbox in seconds and, as I say, it's free.

In the meantime, why not share with us the stocks that you have your eye on, waiting for more attractive pricing?

Are you looking to profit from this uncertain economy? "10 Steps To Making A Million In The Market" is the very latest Motley Fool guide to help Britain invest. Better. We urge you to read the report today -- it's free.

More investing ideas from Malcolm Wheatley:

> Malcolm owns shares in Sainsbury, GlaxoSmithKline and Rolls-Royce. He does not have a holding in any other shares mentioned.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

trmeer 25 Jul 2012 , 9:57am

Good article. There really isn't enough emphasis on waiting to buy at the right price in the investing media. Too much efficient market hypothesis going on.

Dod1010 25 Jul 2012 , 11:40am

Waiting for a decade to buy Cobham? I cannot believe that that is worthwhile although it depends what you have done with the funds in the meantime I suppose. I admire his patience but I am much more likely to buy the target at what seems to me a reasonable price - or move on.

Lost opportunity cost and alll that.

AleisterCrowley 25 Jul 2012 , 12:39pm

I wait until stuff hits rock bottom then I buy.
Then they go down a lot more....
(Hello Chemring. Hello Aviva. Hello Barclays...)

brightncheerful 26 Jul 2012 , 12:08pm

Timing is also about intuition. Intuition is subjective, personal. Generally I ignore the beatings of the media and knee-jerk reactions of private investors, many of whom don't have a clue about what they are investing in and are heavily dependent on what others are saying. When you go it alone and 'tune in' to the mood of the market, the market's assessment of the company, and the company itself, (often needing to read between the lines of the CEO/chairman/PR hype and so on) then I find it possible to sort the wheat from the chaff. I think it also pays to focus on and have an understanding of a particular industry sector so as to be able to form a balanced conclusion. It is said the city is overly concerned with short-term results and performance but I think that's right: if you only take the long view that places a great deal more trust on the company's directors/managers to steer the right course through thick and thin.

On balance, smaller companies are more likely to have the right idea nowadays because the days of thinkers like Arnold Weinstock are long gone. The average tenure of CEO's of large companies is about 5 years or so: they either leave before the market discovers they've got it wrong or are pushed out when they overstay. From that individual's point of view none of that matters because likely they'll get a substantial pay-off but from an investor's perspective it does because often the successor will undo most if not all the initiatives of the predecessor and all that costs money.

For example, the best time to buy retailers was during the early 1980s when most sps were below (tangible) nav. Similarly, the best time more recently to have gone into property companies was when the world fell apart thanks to Lehman.

Sharp falls in the index caused by unexpected non-company related events are buying opportunities. On the day of the London bombings, I bought into Land Securities at about £13; shortly after the sp bounced back to £18 or so. Post-Lehman, LS had a deeply discounted rights issue at about £3.70 or so and have since doubled. I lost interest in LS years ago when I concluded it had gone ex-growth, so only give it as an example.

goodlifer 28 Jul 2012 , 1:51pm

Simple soul, me.
FWIW I just go ahead and buy whenever I think something's worth buying and funds are available.

I don't bother about trying to time..

I'm not saying it's impossible to time your purchases consistently accurately.
It's just that I can't do so, and everyone I know of gets it wrong just about as often as they get it right.

If you've got a crystal ball that actually works I think you're very lucky.
And you must be very, very rich.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.