2 Alternatives To Shell & BP

Published in Investing on 11 July 2012

BP and Shell are sound buys, but there may be better value elsewhere.

The UK is home to two of the world's biggest oil companies, BP (LSE: BP) and Royal Dutch Shell (LSE: RDSB). Both of these are often suggested as good long-term shares for Foolish investors, thanks to their rich stream of dividends, large size and solid prospects.

Although BP and Shell are both sound choices, they aren't the only game in town. Today I'm going to look at the other two major integrated oil companies in western Europe, Total (NYSE: TOT.US) and Repsol (OTC: REPPY.PK), and see how they compare in value terms to BP and Shell.

Before I start, I'd like to add that foreign shares can be held in stocks and shares ISAs, as long as they are listed on a recognised foreign exchange, which includes most of those in Europe. If you'd like some other useful tips on investing, I recommend you download this free report from the Fool: "What Every New Investor Needs To Know".

Financial titans

Integrated oil companies -- companies that both extract oil and sell refined petroleum products -- are all pretty big. Shell is the biggest company in the FTSE 100 (UKX) and BP ranks in the top five.

Although Total and Repsol are smaller, both would comfortably qualify for inclusion in the FTSE 100:

CompanyMarket Cap2011 revenue2011 Pre-tax profitP/EYield
Shell£140bn£302.5bn£35.8bn7.64.8%
BP£81.5bn£241bn£25bn4.94.4%
Total£68bn£148bn£21.4bn7.16.3%
Repsol£11.2bn£48.8bn£3.3bn7.14.5%

It's interest to see how consistent the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratings of these companies are -- except for BP. BP's discounted P/E makes it clear that the company is still being penalised for its Gulf of Mexico spill, something that will probably persist until all compensation and penalty payments have been finalised and it has delivered at least one more year of solid results.

A second factor to note is that Repsol's figures for 2011 may not be all that indicative of this year. In April 2012, Repsol's 57% stake in Argentina's largest oil company, YPF (NYSE: YPF.US), was nationalised without compensation. In 2011, YPF accounted for 26% of Repsol's operating profit and 45% of its reserves.

Giant reserves

In the table below, I've included some key reserve and production data for each company, along with the enterprise value per barrel of its reserves -- a key metric used in valuing oil and gas companies:

CompanyProven Reserves (boe)2011 Production (boe/day)2011 Reserve Replacement RatioEnterprise Value/boe
Shell14,250 million3.2 million99%£11.02
BP17,700 million3.5 million103%*£5.65
Total11,400 million2.3 million185%£7.24
Repsol1,200 million298,800120%**£10.75

*Only 83% excluding BP's stake in TNK-BP, which it hopes to sell.

**Target, following the loss of YPF reserves and resources. Last year's actual figure is meaningless.

The EV/boe column provides another clear illustration of BP's discount to its peers. The market is currently valuing BP's reserves at half the price of Shell's and two-thirds those of Total.

Equally surprising to me is the high value placed on Repsol's reserves. Repsol is currently digging deep to replace its lost YPF assets and has already said it will cut its dividend to free up cash, so that it can spend $1bn a year on exploration activities and increase production from existing assets.

It's a very ambitious plan, and although Repsol expects to fund it from free cash flow, not new debt, it's too soon to say whether it will succeed. It's also too soon to see what the impact of the loss of YPF will be on Repsol's 2012 earnings.

Which would I buy?

For me, each of the four companies above has different attractions and there are none that I would completely rule out.

Shell is both the biggest and the safest, and offers good value and safe income for long-term investors.

BP is cheap but is still a recovery play. It has recently admitted that it would like to sell its stake in the Russian company TNK-BP, but doing so profitably may be difficult and will leave BP with shrinking reserves, unless it invests heavily in new resources elsewhere.

Across the Channel, Total seems to offer very good value. It's very profitable and is currently adding to its reserves at a strong rate. Total also offers a higher yield and a lower EV/boe cost than Shell, adding to its appeal. It lacks Shell's size, however, which might affect its ability to invest in the biggest projects.

Repsol still looks too expensive to me, and I suspect that it has further to fall. Its small size could even make it vulnerable to a takeover bid, but it does have some very high quality assets that could fuel growth over the next few years.

Finally, if you are not keen on oil companies but are keen to invest in solid, dividend-paying shares, I would strongly recommend you download this free report, "8 Shares Held By Britain's Super Investor". It includes details of eight of ultra-successful fund manager Neil Woodford's biggest holdings -- companies he has chosen for their ability to increase their earnings, year after year.

Oils, Pharmaceuticals, Banks, Telecoms -- just where should you invest today? "Top Sectors Of 2012" is the Motley Fool's latest guide to help Britain invest. Better. The report is free.

Further investment opportunities:

> Roland owns shares in Royal Dutch Shell but does not own any of the other shares mentioned in this article.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Cisk999 11 Jul 2012 , 12:02pm

Presumably though buying either creates FX exposure, at the mercy of the Euro?

sopavest 11 Jul 2012 , 1:44pm

@Cisk999

True - there is a certain amount of exchange rate risk, although over the longer-term this might not be such a big issue.

What I think might be a problem with some brokers/ISAs is receiving dividends in a foreign currency and having to pay exchange costs to convert them into GBP, thus wiping out a portion of your yield.

If anyone has recent experience of this it would be interesting to hear about it in the comments.

Cheers,

Roland (article author)

ANuvver 11 Jul 2012 , 6:02pm

re exchange costs, I have investments that pay out in USD and EUR (I'm with TDW).

Brokers' currency spreads are generally pretty merciless, and I prefer to ideally only get stung once by reinvesting dividends in USD and EUR-denominated assets. My principle is: what goes abroad stays abroad. Unless, of course, you manage to hitch a ride on a real rocket stock.

This naturally means that even though the premise for buying a foreign stock may be income, it's an expensive proposition if you plan on converting the income back to sterling (whether to live on or reinvest).

One option, useful if you travel a lot, would be to have dollar and euro bank accounts to funnel the proceeds into.

Currency moves are significant and need to be carefully monitored, particularly with the Euro.

For instance, considered in isolation Ahold has held up pretty well over the past year (+4%), but factoring in GBP-EUR is actually down by 8%. And Intel in isolation is up 25% for the year, but factoring in GBP-USD it's up 29%. (In both cases, excluding your broker's cut.)

A closing thought - oil is denominated in dollars anyway, so you're always going to be affected by currency issues. Under the hood they all operate in USD. But at least the sterling-denominated oil majors employ massive hedging operations and don't pay spiv rates for currency conversion.

ANuvver 11 Jul 2012 , 6:35pm

EDIT:
"Unless, of course, you manage to hitch a ride on a real rocket stock."
+ Or time and circumstance conspire in your favour.

duffmanchon 12 Jul 2012 , 2:03am

You haven't mentioned the political risk to capital gains and dividends from monsieur hollande of 75% income tax fame. Why take the risk when the saying goes never sell Shell!

4spiel 12 Jul 2012 , 12:30pm

I think the exchange costs are the least of the problem apart from the risk of a weakening euro. Of more importance is the witholding tax on the dividend of about 20% in Spain and France. In Italy it is 27% on ENI and it is a lot ot of hassle getting a wee bit of it back above 15%.Then you mkight have to fill in a Spanish Tax return on the sale within 30days to avoid a fine -if they can get you !

Brockasaurus 12 Jul 2012 , 12:59pm

Cisk999, duffmanchon and 4spiel have made good points: there are fx risks and various taxes to consider. However, Total's yield to a GBP person would probably still be highest. But like duffmanchon suggests, that's a fair wedge of unknowns for marginal extra return. I'll keep Shell for now.

Further to ANuvver's comments regarding broker fx trades: I too use TDW. At least they keep USD / EUR / AUD / etc divs in the received currency, meaning you can choose when (or if) to convert to GBP. Or you can reinvest in that currency like ANuvver suggests. The fx rates perhaps aren't the best but they seem better than the high st (low hurdle, I know). ISA accounts and some general trading accounts (like XO) automatically convert foreign divs to GBP. This is less desirable, in my view.

Brockasaurus 12 Jul 2012 , 1:03pm

Btw, would buying the Total ADR skirt the withholding tax issue?

Brockasaurus 13 Jul 2012 , 1:18pm

For anyone wondering, I just translated $ to £ with TDW. There was no fixed cost and the fx rate was 1 / 0.632788 = 1.5803.

The current quote on Google Finance is 1.5447, so the rate I got was inferior to the tune of 2.3% .

High St places (e.g. Travelex and Thomas Cook) are offering to *sell* $ at 1.50, so I guess they would buy at about 1.59 using a symmetric spread about the Google quote (which I regard to be accurate but unachievable to an individual).

So, the TDW rate is between the (good) Google rate and my inferred (bad) High St rate, but closer to the High St rate.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.