GlaxoSmithKline Hits The Heights

Published in Investing on 10 July 2012

One of Neil Woodford's favourites is on a strong bull run.

Ace investor Neil Woodford clearly knew what he was doing when he invested in GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK), as the shares have stormed up close to a five-year record high this week.

The shares closed at 1,499p last night, which is only beaten by the 1,506p they achieved way back on 25 October 2006. They've dropped back a little today, to 1,478p, and did fall along with the markets during the recent crisis.

But it's still a great performance for a FTSE 100 (UKX) share to have risen from a 2009 low point of 1,000p to today's price in just three years -- especially in a sector that is starting to see stiff competition from generic drugs.

Neil Woodford does seem to like pharmaceuticals, having also bought into AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) and Switzerland's Roche. If you want to get an overview of where the great man has the rest of his money, Motley Fool analysts have compiled their "8 Shares Held By Britain's Super Investor" report, which you can get free for a limited time.

GlaxoSmithKline

But today, I'm just going to look at GlaxoSmithKline. What is it doing that's so right? Well, for starters, take a look at how it has been rewarding its shareholders over the past five years, together with estimates for the next two years...

Year to DecemberEarnings per shareDividend per shareDividend increaseYield
200799.1p53p-4.2%
2008104.7p57p7.5%4.5%
2009121.2p61p7.0%4.6%
201053.9p65p6.6%5.1%
2011114.1p70p7.7%4.7%
2012 (e)121.7p74p5.7%5.0%
2013 (e)131.7p79p6.8%5.4%

(Historic yields are based on the end-of-year price, forecast yields on the current price)

Apart from a dip in 2010, a year that saw significant restructuring at the pharmaceuticals giant, we're seeing steady earnings with a general upwards trend. But we also see a strong dividend, coming in at a steady 4.5% to 5% per year, which is a pretty decent return on its own even without any share price rises. And more importantly, there's a firm focus on increasing that dividend every year -- which the company always stresses in its annual reports.

How has it managed it?

Major threats to the world's big pharmaceuticals companies are coming from two main directions. First is the expiry of patents on current drugs and the general decline of the traditional "blockbuster" drug model, and the second is increasing competition from generic drugs, often made in developing countries like China.

But the industry, and GlaxoSmithKline, is changing, and is moving more towards biotechnology in its search for medical advances, with much cleverer diagnostics, gene therapy and a whole host of new approaches helping keep the leaders ahead of the lower technology competition.

Going for growth

This year alone, GlaxoSmithKline has been increasing its share of ownership of US biopharmaceuticals company Theravance (NASDAQ: THRX.US), which develops "small molecule medicines across a number of therapeutic areas including respiratory disease, bacterial infections, and central nervous system". It currently owns 26.7% of it.

And it has also fully acquired Cellzome and its proteomics technologies, has a tender offer open for the entire share capital of Human Genome Sciences (NASDAQ: HGSI.US), and has forged a joint venture with Daiichi Sankyo to create Japan's biggest vaccines company.

The competition

In this, GlaxoSmithKline is ahead of fellow FTSE 100 constituent AstraZeneca, whose acquisition strategy has largely been seen as a bit of a flop -- although AstraZeneca has recently teamed up with Bristol-Myers Squibb (NYSE: BMY.US) in the US to launch a buyout of Amylin Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: AMLN.US).

The AstraZeneca share price has done less well over the past few years, but has been gaining ground in recent months. Perking up from a year low of 2,591p just a month ago to 2,920p today, it has put on 13%. And it has a tasty 6.4% dividend forecast for December 2012.

I reckon the pharmaceuticals sector in general is a good one to be in at the moment, with GlaxoSmithKline my favourite, which is why I chose it for the Motley Fool Beginners' Portfolio. But if you don't fancy it, I'd recommend you have a look at the free report, "Top Sectors Of 2012", which examines other sectors that are looking like bargains right now.

Are you looking to profit as a long-term investor? "10 Steps To Making A Million In The Market" is the latest Motley Fool guide to help Britain invest. Better. We urge you to read the report today -- while it's still free and available.

Further Motley Fool investment opportunities:

> Alan does not own any shares mentioned in this article.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Clackmannan 10 Jul 2012 , 5:13pm

This is on the same day the shares tumble. Not great timing.

GlaxoSmithKline Plc dropped 2.8 percent to 1,454 pence after UBS AG downgraded the company’s profit estimates for the second quarter and cut the price target for the share

TMFBoing 10 Jul 2012 , 5:41pm

I'm really not too interested in the quarter ahead, to be honest - I'm more interested in the next 5 to 10 years. I see a short term drop as a buying opportunity.

Foolish best,
Alan
TMFBoing

mull1 10 Jul 2012 , 9:17pm

Also, the Baby Boom following the Second World War means that the UK population should be peaking about now (2011, 2012), and the number of 'old' people should be at its highest. Thus, there is big demand for GSK's drugs etc.
Also do not forget its massive retail side (eg Colgate etc).

kiffberet 10 Jul 2012 , 10:23pm

GSK is a definate keeper for me. I like the management who appear to be looking after shareholder interest.
Not sure about them owning colgate though...

GoldenSoldier 11 Jul 2012 , 1:27pm

One can often produce good results for a particular share by choosing a particular starting point. I have held GSK for a very long time and I regard its performance as very poor. For example its share price in July 2001 was £20.14. The RPI then was 173.3. Now if we take the share price of £14.78 and the RPI as 242.4, then we are sitting on a real capital loss of 47.3%. We might just have made a very small profit when we include dividends, but we could have done much better with other shares.

Levant1 11 Jul 2012 , 3:03pm

GSK have recently had to pay fines of massive proportions for illegal activities and should be shunned..

F958B 11 Jul 2012 , 4:08pm

GoldenSoldier

At £20.14 in 2001, Glaxo were extremely overvalued; at least 50% more expensive than the then-very-expensive FTSE100.
So it's not surprising that you have seen a very poor capital performance as the shares and the FTSE both reverted back to - and below - the mean.
The dividends from GSK, however, have shown excellent progress; an average of several percent per year increase. One of the most reliable dividend payers on the LondonStockExchange.

nmmerri1 11 Jul 2012 , 7:54pm

Levant1,

Please keep shunning GSK and tell all your friends to too - I want the price to drop so I can buy more! ;-)

All the best,

Neil.

GoldenSoldier 12 Jul 2012 , 1:13pm

F958B

Yes, I agree it was extremely overvalued in July 2001. I was merely quoting that as an example. I did not actually invest in GSK then. I did buy 387 GSK in Aug 2002 at what I thought was a more reasonable price. I bought an additional 437 in April 2007 and another 281 in June 2008 all at relatively low prices. However in spite of that and in spite of the increases in dividend, GSK has turned out to be what I regard as a rather indifferent investment. The real return is less than 2.4% per year. I will continue to hold, hoping that its performance improves.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.